Relapse prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis of brexpiprazole treatment in adult patients with schizophrenia in the USA

被引:9
|
作者
Aigbogun, Myrlene S. [1 ]
Liu, Sizhu [2 ]
Kamat, Siddhesh A. [1 ]
Sapin, Christophe [3 ]
Duhig, Amy M. [2 ]
Citrome, Leslie [4 ]
机构
[1] Otsuka Pharmaceut Dev & Commercializat Inc, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Princeton, NJ USA
[2] Xcenda, Global Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Palm Harbor, FL USA
[3] Lundbeck, Global Analyt, Paris, France
[4] New York Med Coll, Psychiat & Behav Sci, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
来源
关键词
schizophrenia; cost-effectiveness; relapse prevention; cost-benefit; indirect analysis; event avoided; hospitalization avoided; brexpiprazole;
D O I
10.2147/CEOR.S160252
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study used a decision-analytic framework to assess the cost-effectiveness of brexpiprazole vs comparator branded therapies for reducing relapses and hospitalizations among adults with schizophrenia from a US payer perspective. Methods: An economic model was developed to assess patients with stable schizophrenia initiating treatment with brexpiprazole (1-4 mg), cariprazine (1-6 mg), or lurasidone (40-80 mg) over a 1-year period. After 6 months, patients remained on treatment or discontinued due to relapse, adverse events, or other reasons. Patients who discontinued due to relapse or adverse events were assumed to have switched to other therapy, and those who discontinued due to other reasons were assumed to have received no therapy. Primary outcomes were incremental cost per relapse avoided and hospitalization avoided, and the secondary outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted. Results: Brexpiprazole was associated with the highest per-patient clinical effectiveness (avoided relapses 0.637, avoided hospitalizations 0.719, QALYs 0.707) among comparators, followed by cariprazine (avoided relapses 0.590, avoided hospitalizations 0.683, QALYs 0.683) and lurasidone (avoided relapses 0.400, avoided hospitalizations 0.536, QALYs 0.623). Annual per-patient health-care costs were lowest for brexpiprazole ($20,510), followed by cariprazine ($22,282) and lurasidone ($25,510). Brexpiprazole was the least costly and most effective treatment strategy for all outcomes. Results were sensitive to relapse rates and daily cost of brexpiprazole. Limitations include data principally obtained from drug-specific randomized withdrawal studies and lack of direct-comparison trials. Conclusion: This analysis evaluated brexpiprazole treatment for the reduction of schizophrenia relapses and hospitalizations over a 1-year period compared to other recently available branded antipsychotics, and excluded generic antipsychotic treatments. Brexpiprazole treatment may lead to clinical benefits and medical cost savings, and provides a cost-effective treatment option for patients relatively to other branded second-generation antipsychotics.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 456
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Cost-effectiveness analysis of antifungal treatment for patients on chemotherapy
    Nomura, K
    Kawasugi, K
    Morimoto, T
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2006, 15 (01) : 44 - 50
  • [42] Comparative cost-effectiveness of 11 oral antipsychotics for relapse prevention in schizophrenia within Singapore using effectiveness estimates from a network meta-analysis
    Lin, Liang
    Zhao, Ying J.
    Zhou, Hui J.
    Khoo, Ai L.
    Teng, Monica
    Soh, Lay B.
    Lim, Boon P.
    Sim, Kang
    INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 31 (02) : 84 - 92
  • [43] The cost-effectiveness of olanzapine as monotherapy and cotherapy in relapse prevention in bipolar disorder
    McKendrick, J
    Dando, S
    Chinn, C
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 19 (05) : A46 - A46
  • [44] Cost-Effectiveness of a Psychoeducational Relapse Prevention Program for Depression in Primary Care
    Stant, A. Dennis
    TenVergert, Elisabeth M.
    Kluiter, Herman
    Conradi, Henk Jan
    Smit, Annet
    Ormel, Johan
    JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 12 (04): : 195 - 204
  • [45] Cost-effectiveness analysis of biphosphonates and raloxifene for treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures
    Lau, TC
    Lim, BP
    Li, SC
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2005, 8 (03) : 408 - 408
  • [46] Cost-effectiveness of three treatment strategies in adult patients with depression - Comment
    Falissard, B
    Gasquet, I
    REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2001, 49 (02): : 204 - 205
  • [47] Cost-effectiveness analysis of Avance® allograft for the treatment of peripheral nerve injuries in the USA
    Ansaripour, Amir
    Thompson, Ann
    Styron, Joseph F.
    Javanbakht, Mehdi
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (01)
  • [48] Relapse prevention in UK Stop Smoking Services: current practice, systematic reviews of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis
    Coleman, T.
    Agboola, S.
    Leonardi-Bee, J.
    Taylor, M.
    McEwen, A.
    McNeill, A.
    HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2010, 14 (49) : 1 - +
  • [49] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF PALIPERIDONE PALMITATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA IN GERMANY
    Zeidler, J.
    Mahlich, J. C.
    Greiner, W.
    Heres, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A547 - A547
  • [50] RETURNING TO THE ISSUE OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ANTIPSYCHOTICS IN THE TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
    Ohlsen, Ruth
    Taylor, David
    Tandon, Kopal
    Aitchison, Katherine
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHIATRY, 2008, 5 (04): : 184 - 194