Relapse prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis of brexpiprazole treatment in adult patients with schizophrenia in the USA

被引:9
|
作者
Aigbogun, Myrlene S. [1 ]
Liu, Sizhu [2 ]
Kamat, Siddhesh A. [1 ]
Sapin, Christophe [3 ]
Duhig, Amy M. [2 ]
Citrome, Leslie [4 ]
机构
[1] Otsuka Pharmaceut Dev & Commercializat Inc, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Princeton, NJ USA
[2] Xcenda, Global Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Palm Harbor, FL USA
[3] Lundbeck, Global Analyt, Paris, France
[4] New York Med Coll, Psychiat & Behav Sci, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
来源
关键词
schizophrenia; cost-effectiveness; relapse prevention; cost-benefit; indirect analysis; event avoided; hospitalization avoided; brexpiprazole;
D O I
10.2147/CEOR.S160252
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: This study used a decision-analytic framework to assess the cost-effectiveness of brexpiprazole vs comparator branded therapies for reducing relapses and hospitalizations among adults with schizophrenia from a US payer perspective. Methods: An economic model was developed to assess patients with stable schizophrenia initiating treatment with brexpiprazole (1-4 mg), cariprazine (1-6 mg), or lurasidone (40-80 mg) over a 1-year period. After 6 months, patients remained on treatment or discontinued due to relapse, adverse events, or other reasons. Patients who discontinued due to relapse or adverse events were assumed to have switched to other therapy, and those who discontinued due to other reasons were assumed to have received no therapy. Primary outcomes were incremental cost per relapse avoided and hospitalization avoided, and the secondary outcome was cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted. Results: Brexpiprazole was associated with the highest per-patient clinical effectiveness (avoided relapses 0.637, avoided hospitalizations 0.719, QALYs 0.707) among comparators, followed by cariprazine (avoided relapses 0.590, avoided hospitalizations 0.683, QALYs 0.683) and lurasidone (avoided relapses 0.400, avoided hospitalizations 0.536, QALYs 0.623). Annual per-patient health-care costs were lowest for brexpiprazole ($20,510), followed by cariprazine ($22,282) and lurasidone ($25,510). Brexpiprazole was the least costly and most effective treatment strategy for all outcomes. Results were sensitive to relapse rates and daily cost of brexpiprazole. Limitations include data principally obtained from drug-specific randomized withdrawal studies and lack of direct-comparison trials. Conclusion: This analysis evaluated brexpiprazole treatment for the reduction of schizophrenia relapses and hospitalizations over a 1-year period compared to other recently available branded antipsychotics, and excluded generic antipsychotic treatments. Brexpiprazole treatment may lead to clinical benefits and medical cost savings, and provides a cost-effective treatment option for patients relatively to other branded second-generation antipsychotics.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 456
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease in Ethiopia: a cost-effectiveness analysis
    Mieraf Taddesse Tolla
    Ole Frithjof Norheim
    Solomon Tessema Memirie
    Senbeta Guteta Abdisa
    Awel Ababulgu
    Degu Jerene
    Melanie Bertram
    Kirsten Strand
    Stéphane Verguet
    Kjell Arne Johansson
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 14
  • [32] Cost-effectiveness of current and optimal treatment for schizophrenia
    Andrews, G
    Sanderson, K
    Corry, J
    Issakidis, C
    Lapsley, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 183 : 427 - 435
  • [33] COST-EFFECTIVENESS STUDIES IN THE TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA - A REVIEW
    GOLDBERG, D
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 26 (03) : 139 - 142
  • [34] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ASENAPINE IN THE TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA IN CANADA
    Lachaine, J.
    Beauchemin, C.
    Mathurin, K.
    Gilbert, D.
    Beillat, M.
    Corson, H.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (04) : A88 - A88
  • [35] Cost-effectiveness of escitalopram versus placebo in relapse prevention in patients with social anxiety disorder
    Servant, D
    Montgomery, SA
    François, C
    Despiegel, N
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (03) : 351 - 351
  • [36] COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS IN FIRE PREVENTION
    Tuomas, Laine
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2016, 22 : A301 - A301
  • [37] VALIDATING A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS COMPARING OLANZAPINE WITH ZIPRASIDONE IN THE TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA
    Graham, C.
    Mauskopf, J.
    Lawson, A. H.
    Ascher-Svanum, H.
    Bruhn, D.
    Watson, P. R.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (03) : A113 - A113
  • [38] Cost-effectiveness issues in type 2 diabetes prevention in the USA
    Palmer, AJ
    Roze, S
    DIABETES, 2002, 51 : A279 - A279
  • [39] Schizophrenia treatment in the developing world:: an interregional and multinational cost-effectiveness analysis
    Chisholm, Dan
    Gureje, Oye
    Saldivia, Sandra
    Calderon, Marcelo Villalon
    Wickremasinghe, Rajitha
    Mendis, Nalaka
    Ayuso-Mateos, Jose-Luis
    Saxena, Shekhar
    BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2008, 86 (07) : 542 - 551
  • [40] A COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENZA VACCINE IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH CANCER
    Shields, G. E.
    Cranmer, H.
    Camacho, C.
    Porter, J. K.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S224 - S224