COMPARISON OF 4 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE RAPID ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS WITH CYTOTOXIN ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE TOXIN(S) FROM STOOL SPECIMENS

被引:67
|
作者
MERZ, CS [1 ]
KRAMER, C [1 ]
FORMAN, M [1 ]
GLUCK, L [1 ]
MILLS, K [1 ]
SENFT, K [1 ]
STEIMAN, I [1 ]
WALLACE, N [1 ]
CHARACHE, P [1 ]
机构
[1] JOHNS HOPKINS MED INST,DEPT PATHOL,DIV MICROBIOL,BALTIMORE,MD 21287
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.32.5.1142-1147.1994
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Rapid (2.5- to 3.5-h) enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins have been developed. We report the results of simultaneous testing of 700 fresh stool specimens by the tissue culture cytotoxin assay and four EIAs (Bartels Prima System C. difficile Toxin ii EIA Cambridge Biotech Cytoclone A+B EIA, Meridian Diagnostics Premier C. difficile Toxin A EW, and TechLab C. difficile Tox-A Test EW). In cases of disagreement, culturing for toxigenic C. difficile was performed. A total of 61 (8.7%) specimens from 46 patients were positive for C. difficile toxin. The sensitivity of the cytotoxin assay mas 87%, and that of culture was 93%. In comparison with the cytotoxin assay results, the sensitivity and specificity of the EIAs were as follows: Bartels, 87 and 96%; Cambridge, 89 and 99%; Meridian, 87 and 98%; and Techlab, 87 and 95%, respectively. In comparison with the cytotoxin assay plus toxigenic culture results, the sensitivity and specificity of the EIAs were as follows: Bartels, 83 and 97%; Cambridge, 85 and 99%; Meridian, 79 and 98%; and TechLab, 80 and 96%, respectively. The EIAs varied in positive predictive values (PPVs). A high PPV was seen with the Cambridge EW (96%); lower PPVs were seen with the TechLab (64%), Bartels (72%), and Meridian (80%) EIAs because of high false-positive rates. The negative predictice values (98 to 99%) were excellent with all EIAs. Results were indeterminant with 0.3% of the samples by the Meridian EW and 3% by all the other EIAs. Although the EIAs were less sensitive than the cytotoxin assay, they provide same-day results and may be useful in laboratories without tissue culture facilities.
引用
收藏
页码:1142 / 1147
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DETECTION OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE TOXIN WITH MCCOY CELL MONOLAYERS AND CELL-SUSPENSIONS AND COMPARISON WITH HELA-CELL ASSAY
    MANIAR, AC
    CHUBB, H
    LOUIE, TJ
    WILLIAMS, TW
    FORSYTH, W
    WILT, JC
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1984, 19 (02) : 294 - 295
  • [32] Evaluation of four methods for detection of Clostridium difficile or C-difficile toxin: Cytotoxin assay, culture, latex agglutination, and a new-rapid immunoassay (C-difficile toxin A test)
    Fille, M
    Larcher, C
    Dierich, MP
    Allerberger, F
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR GASTROENTEROLOGIE, 1998, 36 (02): : 143 - 149
  • [33] DETECTION OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE TOXINS IN STOOLS - COMPARISON BETWEEN A NEW ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY FOR TOXIN-A AND OTHER ROUTINE TESTS
    DEPITRE, C
    AVESANI, V
    DELMEE, M
    CORTHIER, G
    GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 1993, 17 (04): : 283 - 286
  • [34] Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and rapid diagnostic tests for clostridium difficile glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin a + B to toxinogenic culture on a highly selective chromogenic medium
    A. Olling
    H. Leidinger
    R. Hoffmann
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 2016, 35 : 1655 - 1659
  • [35] Comparison of Three Commercial Methods for Rapid Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxins A and B from Fecal Specimens
    Alcala, L.
    Sanchez-Cambronero, L.
    Catalan, M. P.
    Sanchez-Somolinos, M.
    Pelaez, M. T.
    Marin, M.
    Bouza, E.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 46 (11) : 3833 - 3835
  • [36] Detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B in the stool specimens from patients and medical staff of the children's antituberculosis department
    Ivanko, O. H.
    Patsera, M. V.
    Skrypnykova, Ya. S.
    ZAPOROZHYE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2018, (05) : 692 - 695
  • [37] EVALUATION OF THE BEAD ENZYME-LINKED-IMMUNOSORBENT-ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF CHOLERA-TOXIN DIRECTLY FROM STOOL SPECIMENS
    RAMAMURTHY, T
    BHATTACHARYA, SK
    UESAKA, Y
    HORIGOME, K
    PAUL, M
    SEN, D
    PAL, SC
    TAKEDA, T
    TAKEDA, Y
    NAIR, GB
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1992, 30 (07) : 1783 - 1786
  • [38] Development and Evaluation of a Novel, Rapid, Extraction-Free, Real Time PCR Assay for the Detection of Clostridium difficile from Stool Specimens Targeting Both tcdA and tcdB
    Ranalli, T. A.
    Ott, T. R.
    Armendarez, V.
    Liang, H.
    Ahle, J.
    de Leon, J.
    Curtiss, T.
    Pappas, J.
    Lollar, R.
    Pack, T.
    Stenzel, T.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2012, 14 (06): : 695 - 695
  • [39] Comparison of enzyme immunoassays and rapid diagnostic tests for clostridium difficile glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin a plus B to toxinogenic culture on a highly selective chromogenic medium
    Olling, A.
    Leidinger, H.
    Hoffmann, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 35 (10) : 1655 - 1659
  • [40] Detection of Clostridioides difficile toxin B gene in clinical stool specimens using rapid diagnostic quenching probe-polymerase chain reaction assay
    Hara, Yasuka
    Nakamura, Kiwamu
    Tanno, Daiki
    Toyokawa, Masahiro
    Suzuki, Hiroko
    Ohashi, Kazutaka
    Harada, Rie
    Hidaka, Tomoo
    Nagano, Takashi
    Torii, Kuniaki
    Kanemitsu, Keiji
    JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2023, 205