COMPARISON OF 4 COMMERCIALLY AVAILABLE RAPID ENZYME IMMUNOASSAYS WITH CYTOTOXIN ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE TOXIN(S) FROM STOOL SPECIMENS

被引:67
|
作者
MERZ, CS [1 ]
KRAMER, C [1 ]
FORMAN, M [1 ]
GLUCK, L [1 ]
MILLS, K [1 ]
SENFT, K [1 ]
STEIMAN, I [1 ]
WALLACE, N [1 ]
CHARACHE, P [1 ]
机构
[1] JOHNS HOPKINS MED INST,DEPT PATHOL,DIV MICROBIOL,BALTIMORE,MD 21287
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JCM.32.5.1142-1147.1994
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Rapid (2.5- to 3.5-h) enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins have been developed. We report the results of simultaneous testing of 700 fresh stool specimens by the tissue culture cytotoxin assay and four EIAs (Bartels Prima System C. difficile Toxin ii EIA Cambridge Biotech Cytoclone A+B EIA, Meridian Diagnostics Premier C. difficile Toxin A EW, and TechLab C. difficile Tox-A Test EW). In cases of disagreement, culturing for toxigenic C. difficile was performed. A total of 61 (8.7%) specimens from 46 patients were positive for C. difficile toxin. The sensitivity of the cytotoxin assay mas 87%, and that of culture was 93%. In comparison with the cytotoxin assay results, the sensitivity and specificity of the EIAs were as follows: Bartels, 87 and 96%; Cambridge, 89 and 99%; Meridian, 87 and 98%; and Techlab, 87 and 95%, respectively. In comparison with the cytotoxin assay plus toxigenic culture results, the sensitivity and specificity of the EIAs were as follows: Bartels, 83 and 97%; Cambridge, 85 and 99%; Meridian, 79 and 98%; and TechLab, 80 and 96%, respectively. The EIAs varied in positive predictive values (PPVs). A high PPV was seen with the Cambridge EW (96%); lower PPVs were seen with the TechLab (64%), Bartels (72%), and Meridian (80%) EIAs because of high false-positive rates. The negative predictice values (98 to 99%) were excellent with all EIAs. Results were indeterminant with 0.3% of the samples by the Meridian EW and 3% by all the other EIAs. Although the EIAs were less sensitive than the cytotoxin assay, they provide same-day results and may be useful in laboratories without tissue culture facilities.
引用
收藏
页码:1142 / 1147
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Detection of Clostridium difficile and its Toxin A (TCDA) in Stool Specimens from Hospitalized Patients
    Luczak, M.
    Wroblewska, M.
    Rokosz, A.
    Swoboda-Kopec, E.
    Nurzynska, G.
    Bednarska, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2005, 26 : S90 - S90
  • [22] CLINICAL COMPARISON OF LATEX AGGLUTINATION AND CYTO-TOXIN ASSAY FOR DETECTION OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE TOXIN IN FECES
    WOODS, GL
    YAM, P
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 1988, 19 (10) : 649 - 651
  • [23] Detection of Clostridium difficile antigen and toxin in stool specimens: Comparison of the C. difficile quik chek complete enzyme immunoassay and GeneXpert C. difficile polymerase chain reaction assay
    Senok, Abiola C.
    Aldosari, Kamel M.
    Alowaisheq, Rayan A.
    Abid, Othman A.
    Alsuhaibani, Khalid A.
    Khan, Mohammad A.
    Somily, Ali M.
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 23 (04): : 259 - 262
  • [24] COMPARISON OF BACTERIAL ISOLATION, CYTO-TOXICITY ASSAY, AND COUNTERIMMUNOELECTROPHORESIS FOR THE DETECTION OF CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE AND ITS TOXIN
    JARVIS, W
    NUNEZMONTIEL, O
    THOMPSON, F
    DOWELL, V
    TOWNS, M
    MORRIS, G
    HILL, E
    JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1983, 147 (04): : 778 - 778
  • [25] Evaluation of s Novel, Rapid, Real Time PCR Assay for the Detection of Clostridium difficile from Stool Specimens Targeting Both TCDA and TCDB
    Rivera, J.
    Mitchell, K.
    Curtiss, T.
    Pappas, J.
    Lollar, R.
    Stenzel, T.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2012, 14 (06): : 692 - 692
  • [26] Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin:: Comparison of enzyme immunoassay results with results obtained by cytotoxicity assay
    Musher, Daniel M.
    Manhas, Atisha
    Jain, Pranav
    Nuila, Franziska
    Waqar, Amna
    Logan, Nancy
    Marino, Bernard
    Graviss, Edward A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (08) : 2737 - 2739
  • [27] GEL-FILTRATION OF TOXIN(S) FROM ANTIBIOTIC ASSOCIATED COLITIS STOOL AND FROM CLOSTRIDIUM-DIFFICILE BROTH CULTURES
    HUMPHREY, CD
    CONDON, CW
    PITTMAN, FE
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1979, 76 (05) : 1157 - 1157
  • [28] Clinical Evaluation of the Great Basin Clostridium difficile Assay and the BD GeneOhm Cdiff ACP Assay for the Rapid Detection of Clostridium difficile Toxin B Gene in Fecal Specimens
    Fuller, D. D.
    Newcomer, K. L.
    June, A. L.
    Talbott, J. D.
    Buckner, R. J.
    Davis, T. E.
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2012, 14 (06): : 694 - 694
  • [29] Evaluation of a New Commercial TaqMan PCR Assay for Direct Detection of the Clostridium difficile Toxin B Gene in Clinical Stool Specimens
    Stamper, Paul D.
    Babiker, Wisal
    Alcabasa, Romina
    Aird, Deborah
    Wehrlin, Jennifer
    Ikpeama, Ijeoma
    Gluck, Linda
    Carroll, Karen C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 47 (12) : 3846 - 3850
  • [30] Rapid detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile from stool samples by a nested PCR of toxin B gene
    Alonso, R
    Muñoz, C
    Gros, S
    Garcia de Viedma, D
    Peláez, T
    Bouza, E
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1999, 41 (02) : 145 - 149