Reducing the health risk by using rapid quantification methods for the monitoring of E. coli and Enterococci in bathing waters

被引:1
|
作者
Courtois, S. [1 ]
Do Quang, Z. [1 ]
Bergeron, P. [2 ]
Masse, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] CIRSEE, SUEZ Environm, 38 Rue President Wilson, F-78230 Le Pecq, France
[2] Lyonnaise Eaux France, Ctr Tech Littoral, F-64200 Biarritz, France
来源
WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2009年 / 4卷 / 04期
关键词
Bathing waters; recreational area; microbial indicators; rapid quantification; RT-PCR;
D O I
10.2166/WPT.2009.073
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Recreational waters are monitored worldwide to protect bathers from infectious diseases caused by waterborne pathogens associated with the pollution of natural recreational waters by human and animal feces. Water quality standards are typically based on measurements of the concentrations of fecal indicator organisms (Escherichia coli and Enterococcus) and are becoming more stringent. A complicating factor is the time required (18-36 hours) for completion of conventional culture-based methods (as approved by the US EPA or ISO institutions). During the lag time between sample collection and availability of results indicator and pathogen levels, weather and water conditions may change and thus related health risk may also change. By using new rapid analytical tools, critical control points can be monitored to provide information so that management actions can have an impact on the exposure risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate the capacity of two new alternative methods for the rapid and routine enumeration of E. coli and Enterococci in bathing waters: fluorimetric assays based on the measurement of enzymatic activities, and quantitative RT-PCR. Both methods are fast (1 hour for 6 samples analysed by one fluorescence spectrophotometer; 3 hours for the simultaneous analysis of 15 to 96 samples by RT-PCR) and their results (for the microbiological criteria of current European regulations) compared with those from the standard methods are congruent in more than 81% of analysed samples. Because these methods provide a faster assessment of water quality, they have the potential to significantly reduce health risk resulting from exposure to recreational waters and also reduce errors in beach closing.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fluorescent antibody-viability staining and β-glucuronidase assay as rapid methods for monitoring Escherichia coli viability in coastal marine waters
    Caruso, G
    De Pasquale, F
    Mancuso, M
    Zampino, D
    Crisafi, E
    JOURNAL OF IMMUNOASSAY & IMMUNOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 27 (01): : 1 - 13
  • [42] Investigating RNAP Search Dynamics in Live E. Coli Cells using Single Molecule and Statistical Methods
    Bettridge, Kelsey
    Bohrer, Chris
    Xiao, Jie
    BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 112 (03) : 312A - 312A
  • [43] Analysis of comparative efficiencies of different transformation methods of E. coli using two common plasmid vectors
    Roychoudhury, Aryadeep
    Basu, Supratim
    Sengupta, Dibyendu N.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY & BIOPHYSICS, 2009, 46 (05): : 395 - 400
  • [44] Biocathodes reducing oxygen in BPE-ECL system for rapid screening of E. coli O157:H7
    Chen, Bin
    Tao, Qin
    OuYang, Songtao
    Wang, Minhui
    Liu, Yuanjian
    Xiong, Xiaohui
    Liu, Songqin
    BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS, 2023, 221
  • [45] Comparison of Extraction Methods for E. coli Metabolome Analysis Using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
    Mei Hui
    Dai Jun
    Liu Wen-Wei
    Ling Xia
    Zhu Peng-Fei
    Zhao Zhi-Jun
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 39 (04) : 534 - 539
  • [46] PHOTOCATALYTIC DISINFECTION TREATMENTS: VIABILITY, CULTIVABILITY AND METABOLIC CHANGES OF E. coli USING DIFERENT MESUREMENTS METHODS
    Sanabria, Janeth
    Wist, Julien
    Pulgarin, Cesar
    DYNA-COLOMBIA, 2011, 78 (166): : 150 - 157
  • [47] Validity assessment of Michigan's proposed qPCR threshold value for rapid water-quality monitoring of E. coli contamination
    McNair, James N.
    Lane, Molly J.
    Hart, John J.
    Porter, Alexis M.
    Briggs, Shannon
    Southwell, Benjamin
    Sivy, Tami
    Szlag, David C.
    Scull, Brian T.
    Pike, Schuyler
    Dreelin, Erin
    Vernier, Chris
    Carter, Bonnie
    Sharp, Josh
    Nowlin, Penny
    Rediske, Richard R.
    WATER RESEARCH, 2022, 226
  • [48] Rapid differentiation between E. coli and Salmonella Typhimurium using metal oxide sensors integrated with pattern recognition
    Siripatrawan, Ubonrat
    SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL, 2008, 133 (02) : 414 - 419
  • [49] Rapid Strain Differentiation of E. coli-inoculated Urine Using Olfactory-based Smart Sensors
    Adebiyi, Aminat
    Than, Nam
    Swaminathan, Sarath
    Abdi, Mohammed
    Bowers, Amy N.
    Fasoli, Andrea
    Mannari, Alberto
    Bozano, Luisa
    SENSORS AND ELECTRONIC INSTRUMENTATION ADVANCES (SEIA' 19), 2019, : 307 - 310
  • [50] Assessing E. coli levels in surface soils of informal settlements using boot sock and standard grab methods
    Bata, Lamiya
    Henry, Rebekah
    Barker, S. Fiona
    Boyce, John
    Lynch, Fiona
    Vilsoni, Silvia Rosovoa
    Tela, Autiko
    Vamosi, Revoni
    Taruc, Ruzka R.
    Agussalim, Andi Zulkifli
    Saifuddaolah, Maghfira
    Handis, Zainal
    Mccarthy, David
    Leder, Karin
    RISE Consortium
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2025, 11 (11):