Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group

被引:9
|
作者
Doshi, Rajkumar [1 ]
Patel, Krunalkumar [1 ]
Decter, Dean [1 ]
Jauhar, Rajiv [1 ]
Meraj, Perwaiz [1 ]
机构
[1] North Shore Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Northwell Hlth, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
关键词
Mechanical circulatory device; Cardiogenic shock; High-risk PCI; Gender;
D O I
10.1016/j.ihj.2018.04.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Hemodynamic support with Impella (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA) devices is becoming a more prevalent treatment option for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There exists only limited published data regarding outcome differences between male and female patients. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to analyze these gender differences between short-term survival and in-hospital outcomes in those undergoing PCI with CS. Methods: Between January 2011 and July 2016, patients undergoing PCI with simultaneous use of Impella were identified. Only patients presenting with CS were included in the analysis. All-cause in-hospital mortality was the primary outcome. Using SAS 9.4 for propensity score matching, additional secondary outcomes were also compared. Results: The primary outcome was comparable between males and females (39.5% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.33) in CS patients. Secondary outcomes were also comparable and included: myocardial infarction, stroke, CS, heart failure, dialysis requirement, bleeding within 72 h, blood transfusion, dysrhythmia, composite of all complications, major adverse cardiac events. Survival at 30 days was equal in both groups. A reduced mortality in males was noted for pre-PCI initiation of Impella. Additionally, both genders who received pre-PCI Impella support, experienced a significant reduction in inotrope use. Conclusions: Despite the small number of cohorts, this study did not reveal any significant differences among gender with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS. However, initiation of Impella prior to PCI may be associated with improved mortality and morbidity in both genders. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cardiological Society of India.
引用
收藏
页码:S90 / S95
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Protected Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Percutaneous Left Ventricle Assist Device Protection
    Legutko, Jacek
    Kleczynski, Pawel
    Niewiara, Luke
    Pawlik, Artur
    Weglan, Katarzyna
    Kwiatkowska, Ewa
    Stanislaw, Bartus
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148
  • [42] A case of cardiogenic shock due to acute coronary syndrome successfully recovered by percutaneous and paracorporeal left ventricular assist device
    Nakamura, Makiko
    Hori, Masakazu
    Nakagaito, Masaki
    Kuwahara, Hiroyuki
    Kinoshita, Osamu
    Ono, Minoru
    Yokoyama, Shigeki
    Doi, Toshio
    Fukahara, Kazuaki
    Kinugawa, Koichiro
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2019, 22 (03) : 249 - 252
  • [43] A case of cardiogenic shock due to acute coronary syndrome successfully recovered by percutaneous and paracorporeal left ventricular assist device
    Makiko Nakamura
    Masakazu Hori
    Masaki Nakagaito
    Hiroyuki Kuwahara
    Osamu Kinoshita
    Minoru Ono
    Shigeki Yokoyama
    Toshio Doi
    Kazuaki Fukahara
    Koichiro Kinugawa
    Journal of Artificial Organs, 2019, 22 : 249 - 252
  • [44] Treatment of left main shock syndrome with percutaneous coronary intervention in the absence of an advanced left ventricular assist device or ECMO
    Vural, Mutlu
    Sahin, Irfan
    Avci, Ilker
    Kizkapan, Fatih
    Yildiz, Sezai
    ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 15 (06): : 505 - 507
  • [45] Randomized comparison of intraaortic balloon support versus a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Thiele, H
    Boudriot, E
    Sick, R
    Diederich, KW
    Niebauer, J
    Hambrecht, R
    Schuler, G
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2004, 25 : 73 - 73
  • [46] Left ventricular unloading before percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved survival in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock
    Miyashita, S.
    Marbach, J.
    Banlengchit, R.
    Kapur, N.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2021, 42 : 1533 - 1533
  • [47] SURVIVAL TO DISCHARGE IN ST ELEVATION MI PATIENTS WITH CARDIOGENIC SHOCK UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE AND PCI: EXPERIENCE DOES MATTER
    Ahmad, Tariq Ali
    Wilson, Ryan
    Plamenac, Jovan
    Lall, Sumeet
    Dembo, Brent
    Kogut, James
    Zack, Chad
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2019, 73 (09) : 1401 - 1401
  • [48] Percutaneous left ventricular assist device: "TandemHeart" for high-risk coronary intervention
    Aragon, J
    Lee, MS
    Kar, S
    Makkar, RR
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2005, 65 (03) : 346 - 352
  • [49] Use of a percutaneous ventricular assist device for treatment of cardiogenic shock due to critical aortic stenosis
    Frank, Christopher M.
    Palanichamy, Nanthini
    Kar, Biswajit
    Wilson, James M.
    Gregoric, Igor D.
    Loyalka, Pranav
    Civitello, Andrew B.
    TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE JOURNAL, 2006, 33 (04): : 487 - 489
  • [50] Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Under Cover of Left Ventricular Assist Device (Impella 2.5)
    Iftikhar, Imran
    Khan, Hamid Sharif
    Kayani, Azhar Mahmood
    Shahzad, Hassan
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2015, 25 (10): : S78 - S80