Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group

被引:9
|
作者
Doshi, Rajkumar [1 ]
Patel, Krunalkumar [1 ]
Decter, Dean [1 ]
Jauhar, Rajiv [1 ]
Meraj, Perwaiz [1 ]
机构
[1] North Shore Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, Northwell Hlth, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
关键词
Mechanical circulatory device; Cardiogenic shock; High-risk PCI; Gender;
D O I
10.1016/j.ihj.2018.04.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Hemodynamic support with Impella (Abiomed Inc., Danvers, MA) devices is becoming a more prevalent treatment option for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There exists only limited published data regarding outcome differences between male and female patients. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to analyze these gender differences between short-term survival and in-hospital outcomes in those undergoing PCI with CS. Methods: Between January 2011 and July 2016, patients undergoing PCI with simultaneous use of Impella were identified. Only patients presenting with CS were included in the analysis. All-cause in-hospital mortality was the primary outcome. Using SAS 9.4 for propensity score matching, additional secondary outcomes were also compared. Results: The primary outcome was comparable between males and females (39.5% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.33) in CS patients. Secondary outcomes were also comparable and included: myocardial infarction, stroke, CS, heart failure, dialysis requirement, bleeding within 72 h, blood transfusion, dysrhythmia, composite of all complications, major adverse cardiac events. Survival at 30 days was equal in both groups. A reduced mortality in males was noted for pre-PCI initiation of Impella. Additionally, both genders who received pre-PCI Impella support, experienced a significant reduction in inotrope use. Conclusions: Despite the small number of cohorts, this study did not reveal any significant differences among gender with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist devices for PCI in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by CS. However, initiation of Impella prior to PCI may be associated with improved mortality and morbidity in both genders. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Cardiological Society of India.
引用
收藏
页码:S90 / S95
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Use of a Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device For High-Risk Cardiac Interventions and Cardiogenic Shock
    Thomas, Joseph L.
    Al-Ameri, Hazim
    Economides, Christina
    Shareghi, Shahrzad
    Abad, Damian Grovas
    Mayeda, Guy
    Burstein, Steven
    Shavelle, David M.
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2010, 22 (08): : 360 - 364
  • [22] Outcomes of Older Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Using the Impella Device ― Insights From the Japanese Registry for Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device (J-PVAD) ―
    Higuchi, Ryosuke
    Nanasato, Mamoru
    Hosoya, Yumiko
    Isobe, Mitsuaki
    CIRCULATION REPORTS, 2024, 6 (11) : 505 - 513
  • [23] Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
    Sundaravel, Swethika
    Velagapudi, Poonam
    Mamas, Mamas
    Nathan, Sandeep
    Truesdell, Alexander
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2021, (174):
  • [24] UTILIZATION OF PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION (PCI) IN LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE (LVAD) PATIENTS
    Shah, Deep
    Shah, Ali
    Bittenbender, Peter M.
    Varian, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 81 (08) : 3100 - 3100
  • [25] PERCUTANEOUS HEMODYNAMIC SUPPORT FOR CARDIOGENIC SHOCK PRIOR TO LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE PLACEMENT
    Shah, Palak
    Cowger, Jennifer
    Haft, Jonathan
    Romano, Matthew
    Aaronson, Keith
    Pagani, Francis
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2013, 61 (10) : E774 - E774
  • [26] Successful Management of Pheochromocytoma Crisis with Cardiogenic Shock by Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device
    Nakamura, Makiko
    Imamura, Teruhiko
    Fukui, Takuya
    Oshima, Akira
    Ueno, Hiroshi
    Kinugawa, Koichiro
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2022, 9 (03)
  • [27] Percutaneous Left Ventricular Support With the Impella 2.5 Assist Device in Severe Cardiogenic Shock
    Freeari, Markus
    Engstroem, Annemarie E.
    Jung, Christian
    Empen, Klaus
    Erne, Paul
    Cook, Stephane
    Windecker, Stephan
    Bergmann, Martin W.
    Klingenberg, Roland
    Luescher, Thomas F.
    Haude, Michael
    Rukands, Dierk
    Butter, Christian
    Ullman, Bengt
    Hellgren, Laila
    Modena, Maria Grazia
    Pedrazzini, Giovanni
    Henriques, Jose P.
    Figulla, Hans R.
    Lauten, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 58 (20) : B133 - B133
  • [28] Percutaneous Hemodynamic Support for Cardiogenic Shock Prior to Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement
    Shah, P.
    Cowger, J. A.
    Haft, J. W.
    Romano, M. A.
    Aaronson, K. D.
    Pagani, F. D.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2013, 32 (04): : S141 - S141
  • [29] Bedside insertion of impella percutaneous ventricular assist device in patients with cardiogenic shock
    Pieri, Marina
    Pappalardo, Federico
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 316 : 26 - 30
  • [30] Outcome of patients with non-ischaemic cardiogenic shock supported by percutaneous left ventricular assist device
    Haurand, Jean M.
    Haberkorn, Sandra
    Haschemi, Jafer
    Oehler, Daniel
    Aubin, Hug
    Akhyari, Payam
    Boeken, Udo
    Kelm, Malte
    Westenfeld, Ralf
    Horn, Patrick
    ESC HEART FAILURE, 2021, 8 (05): : 3594 - 3602