PROCESSING RELATIVE CLAUSES VARYING ON SYNTACTIC AND SEMANTIC DIMENSIONS - AN ANALYSIS WITH EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS

被引:194
|
作者
MECKLINGER, A [1 ]
SCHRIEFERS, H [1 ]
STEINHAUER, K [1 ]
FRIEDERICI, AD [1 ]
机构
[1] NIJMEGEN INST COGNIT RES & INFORMAT TECHNOL, NIJMEGEN, NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03197249
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Event-related potentials were used to study how parsing of German relative clauses is influenced by semantic information. Subjects read well-formed sentences containing either a subject or an object relative clause and answered questions concerning the thematic roles expressed in those sentences. Half of the sentences contained past participles that on grounds of semantic plausibility biased either a subject or an object relative reading; the other half contained past participles that provided no semantic information favoring either reading. The past participle elicited an N400 component, larger in amplitude for neutral than for semantically biased verbs, but this occurred only in the case of subject relative clauses. More specific effects were obtained only for a subgroup of subjects, when these were grouped into fast and slow comprehenders on the basis of their question-answering reaction times. Fast comprehenders showed larger N400 amplitudes for neutral than for semantically biased past participles in general and larger N400s for the latter when there was a bias for an object relative reading as opposed to a subject relative reading. Syntactic ambiguity resolution, indicated by an auxiliary in sentence final position, was associated in this subgroup with a positive component (P345), larger in amplitude for auxiliaries indicating an object relative reading than for those indicating a subject relative reading. The latter component was independent of semantically biasing information given by a preceding past participle. Implications of these findings for models of language comprehension are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 494
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related potentials
    Ainsworth-Darnell, K
    Shulman, HG
    Boland, JE
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 38 (01) : 112 - 130
  • [32] The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials
    Kim, A
    Osterhout, L
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2005, 52 (02) : 205 - 225
  • [33] Auditory event-related potentials during phonetic and semantic processing in children
    Henkin, Y
    Kishon-Rabin, L
    Gadoth, N
    Pratt, H
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2002, 7 (04) : 228 - 239
  • [34] Using event-related potentials to examine hemispheric differences in semantic processing
    Atchley, RA
    Kwasny, KM
    BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2003, 53 (02) : 133 - 138
  • [35] Hemispheric differences in orthographic and semantic processing as revealed by event-related potentials
    Dickson, Danielle S.
    Federmeier, Kara D.
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2014, 64 : 230 - 239
  • [36] An event-related fMRI study of syntactic and semantic violations
    Newman, AJ
    Pancheva, R
    Ozawa, K
    Neville, HJ
    Ullman, MT
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 2001, 30 (03) : 339 - 364
  • [37] An Event-Related fMRI Study of Syntactic and Semantic Violations
    Aaron J. Newman
    Roumyana Pancheva
    Kaori Ozawa
    Helen J. Neville
    Michael T. Ullman
    Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2001, 30 : 339 - 364
  • [38] EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS ELICITED BY SYNTACTIC ANOMALY
    OSTERHOUT, L
    HOLCOMB, PJ
    JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1992, 31 (06) : 785 - 806
  • [39] An event-related fMRI study of implicit phrase-level syntactic and semantic processing
    Kang, AM
    Constable, RT
    Gore, JC
    Avrutin, S
    NEUROIMAGE, 1999, 10 (05) : 555 - 561
  • [40] EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING
    CHOPE, M
    METZLUTZ, MN
    WIOLAND, N
    RUMBACH, L
    KURTZ, D
    NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 24 (04): : 275 - 300