PROCESSING RELATIVE CLAUSES VARYING ON SYNTACTIC AND SEMANTIC DIMENSIONS - AN ANALYSIS WITH EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS

被引:194
|
作者
MECKLINGER, A [1 ]
SCHRIEFERS, H [1 ]
STEINHAUER, K [1 ]
FRIEDERICI, AD [1 ]
机构
[1] NIJMEGEN INST COGNIT RES & INFORMAT TECHNOL, NIJMEGEN, NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03197249
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Event-related potentials were used to study how parsing of German relative clauses is influenced by semantic information. Subjects read well-formed sentences containing either a subject or an object relative clause and answered questions concerning the thematic roles expressed in those sentences. Half of the sentences contained past participles that on grounds of semantic plausibility biased either a subject or an object relative reading; the other half contained past participles that provided no semantic information favoring either reading. The past participle elicited an N400 component, larger in amplitude for neutral than for semantically biased verbs, but this occurred only in the case of subject relative clauses. More specific effects were obtained only for a subgroup of subjects, when these were grouped into fast and slow comprehenders on the basis of their question-answering reaction times. Fast comprehenders showed larger N400 amplitudes for neutral than for semantically biased past participles in general and larger N400s for the latter when there was a bias for an object relative reading as opposed to a subject relative reading. Syntactic ambiguity resolution, indicated by an auxiliary in sentence final position, was associated in this subgroup with a positive component (P345), larger in amplitude for auxiliaries indicating an object relative reading than for those indicating a subject relative reading. The latter component was independent of semantically biasing information given by a preceding past participle. Implications of these findings for models of language comprehension are considered.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 494
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS WHILE ENCOUNTERING SEMANTIC AND SYNTACTIC CONSTRAINT VIOLATIONS
    ROSLER, F
    PUTZ, P
    FRIEDERICI, A
    HAHNE, A
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 5 (03) : 345 - 362
  • [22] Event-related potentials and semantic processing: Effects on encoding and retrieval
    Heimberg, DR
    Zechner, S
    Naber, G
    Gerhard, U
    Hobi, V
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1998, 30 (1-2) : 145 - 146
  • [23] Event-related potentials in semantic information processing in schizophrenic patients
    Spitzer, M
    Weisbrod, M
    Winkler, S
    Maier, S
    NERVENARZT, 1997, 68 (03): : 212 - 225
  • [24] Interactive processing of timbre dimensions: An exploration with event-related potentials
    Caclin, Anne
    McAdams, Stephen
    Smith, Bennett K.
    Giard, Marie-Helene
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 20 (01) : 49 - 64
  • [25] Mechanisms underlying syntactic and semantic processing of Chinese simple sentences Evidence from event-related brain potentials
    Fang, Huanhai
    Zhao, Ming
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2011, 6 (25) : 1937 - 1941
  • [27] Syntactic expectancy:: an event-related potentials study
    Hinojosa, JA
    Moreno, EM
    Casado, P
    Muñoz, F
    Pozo, MA
    NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS, 2005, 378 (01) : 34 - 39
  • [28] SEMANTIC CATEGORIZATION AND EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS
    POLICH, J
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1985, 26 (02) : 304 - 321
  • [29] Predictive processing of syntactic information: evidence from event-related brain potentials
    Yano, Masataka
    LANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 33 (08) : 1017 - 1031
  • [30] In-line measures of syntactic processing using event-related brain potentials
    Kutas, M
    King, JW
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1999, 22 (01) : 104 - +