GENOTYPES AT THE HAL LOCUS AND REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS IN PIGS OF THE BREEDING POPULATION OF THE LANDRACE BREED

被引:0
|
作者
DVORAK, J
机构
来源
ZIVOCISNA VYROBA | 1992年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词
PIGS; STRESS; GENOTYPES HAL; REPRODUCTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The results presented were obtained in a breeding population of the Landrace breed. Genotypes at the HAL locus were determined by haplotyping after Hojny et al. [1987] using four polymorphic loci GPI, H, A1BG and PGD of the linkage group of 6th chromosomes. All piglets were subjected to the halothane test. In a group of 106 sows, the overall numbers of litters in HAL genotypes N/N, N/n and n/n were 5.68, 5.81 and 4.96, resp. The evaluation of the causes of sow disposal showed that the number of stress-susceptible n/n sows, culled due to reproductive disorders, was twice that of N/N sows. Within groups of individual genotypes, great variability was found to exist. This is a basis for successful breeding programmes with well-defined genotypes. The investigations into the reproductive performance revealed inferior parameters in stress-susceptible sows. With respect to HAL genotypes, the difference between sows, dominant N/N [11.8] and recessive n/n homozygotes [10.3], in the total number of births was 1.46 piglets and in the number of piglets weaned 0.73. Preweaning mortality of piglets in N/N, N/n, and n/n sows was 11.2, 8.6 and 9.7 %, resp. The analysis of reproduction in boars of HAL genotypes showed that the number of total births was best in n/n genotypes [11.3 piglets]. As for the number of piglets weaned, best were N/N boars [9.2 piglets]. The percentage of pre-weaning mortality of piglets from N/N, N/n and n/n boars was 8.3, 10.5 and 11.5, resp. The other part of the study gives results concerning reproduction in different combinations of parents af HAL genotypes. As for the total number of births, the best combination was N/n boars X N/N sows [11.8 piglets] and the worst N/N X n/n [10.4], the difference being 1.42 piglets per litter. The number of liveborn piglets was highest in n/n X N/N [11.1] and lowest in n/n X N/n [9.8], the difference being 1.17 piglets. As for the number of piglets weaned, N/n X N/N [9.8] was the best combination and N/n X X n/n [8.6] the worst one. The evaluation of the piglets weaned with respect only to the genotype of the sire or the dam showed that N/N genotypes were the best. However, their mutual combination took up the 7th position out of the 9 combinations studied. From the viewpoint of four reproductive indices (number of total births, live births, piglets weaned and litter weight at 21 days) studied in a breeding herd of Landrace pigs for 3 years, the combination of n/n boars with N/N sows gave the best results. Compared with other combinations of genotypes at the HAL locus, this combination was the second best in the number of total births, the best in the number of liveborn piglets, the second best in the number of piglets weaned and the best in litter weight. The results suggested that it became necessary to know HAL genotypes of breeding animals showing susceptibility to stress so that genotypes chosen might be suitable for the breeding goal.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 203
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [31] Accuracy of estimated genomic breeding values for wool and meat traits in a multi-breed sheep population
    Daetwyler, H. D.
    Hickey, J. M.
    Henshall, J. M.
    Dominik, S.
    Gredler, B.
    van der Werf, J. H. J.
    Hayes, B. J.
    ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2010, 50 (11-12) : 1004 - 1010
  • [32] GENETIC ANALYSES OF GROWTH, REAL-TIME ULTRASOUND, CARCASS, AND PORK QUALITY TRAITS IN DUROC AND LANDRACE PIGS .1. BREED EFFECTS
    LO, LL
    MCLAREN, DG
    MCKEITH, FK
    FERNANDO, RL
    NOVAKOFSKI, J
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1992, 70 (08) : 2373 - 2386
  • [33] Case Study on Increasing Breeding Value Estimation Reliability of Reproductive Traits in Serbian Highly Prolific Large White and Landrace Sows
    Stojiljkovic, Nenad
    Radojkovic, Dragan
    Lukovic, Zoran
    Gogic, Marija
    Radovic, Cedomir
    Popovac, Mladen
    Skorput, Dubravko
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (19):
  • [34] POLYMORPHISM OF PROLACTIN RECEPTOR GENE (PRLR) IN THE POLISH LANDRACE AND POLISH LARGE WHITE SWINE POPULATION AND REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS
    Ziolkowska, Agata
    Bogdzinska, Maria
    Biegniewski, Jan
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE, 2010, 11 (04): : 443 - 448
  • [35] Quantitative trait locus mapping for meat quality traits in an Iberian x Landrace F2 pig population
    Ovilo, C
    Clop, A
    Noguera, JL
    Oliver, MA
    Barragán, C
    Rodríguez, C
    Siló, L
    Toro, MA
    Coll, A
    Folch, JM
    Sánchez, A
    Babot, D
    Varona, L
    Pérez-Enciso, M
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 80 (11) : 2801 - 2808
  • [36] HAPLOTYPES OF THE LINKAGE GROUP S-HAL-GPI-H-A1BG-PGD IN BREEDING PIGS OF THE PRESTICE BLACK-PIED BREED FOR STRESS RESISTANCE
    GABRISOVA, E
    CIZOVA, D
    HONY, J
    ZIVOCISNA VYROBA, 1992, 37 (08): : 625 - 632
  • [37] Associations between Alu I polymorphism in the prolactin receptor gene and reproductive traits of Slovak Large White, White Meaty and Landrace pigs
    Omelka, R.
    Martiniakova, M.
    Peskovicova, D.
    Bauerova, M.
    ASIAN-AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2008, 21 (04): : 484 - 488
  • [38] Inbreeding effects on reproductive traits in a breeding population of Pacific white shrimp Penaeus (Litopenaeus) vannamei
    de los Rios-Perez, Lidia
    Campos-Montes, Gabriel R.
    Martinez-Ortega, Alfonso
    Castillo-Juarez, Hector
    Montaldo, Hugo H.
    AQUACULTURE, 2017, 479 : 442 - 446
  • [39] The Association of an SNP in the EXOC4 Gene and Reproductive Traits Suggests Its Use as a Breeding Marker in Pigs
    He, Yingting
    Zhou, Xiaofeng
    Zheng, Rongrong
    Jiang, Yao
    Yao, Zhixiang
    Wang, Xilong
    Zhang, Zhe
    Zhang, Hao
    Li, Jiaqi
    Yuan, Xiaolong
    ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (02): : 1 - 13
  • [40] Genome-wide association analyses for meat quality traits in Chinese Erhualian pigs and a Western Duroc × (Landrace × Yorkshire) commercial population
    Xianxian Liu
    Xinwei Xiong
    Jie Yang
    Lisheng Zhou
    Bin Yang
    Huashui Ai
    Huanban Ma
    Xianhua Xie
    Yixuan Huang
    Shaoming Fang
    Shijun Xiao
    Jun Ren
    Junwu Ma
    Lusheng Huang
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 47