GENOTYPES AT THE HAL LOCUS AND REPRODUCTIVE TRAITS IN PIGS OF THE BREEDING POPULATION OF THE LANDRACE BREED

被引:0
|
作者
DVORAK, J
机构
来源
ZIVOCISNA VYROBA | 1992年 / 37卷 / 03期
关键词
PIGS; STRESS; GENOTYPES HAL; REPRODUCTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The results presented were obtained in a breeding population of the Landrace breed. Genotypes at the HAL locus were determined by haplotyping after Hojny et al. [1987] using four polymorphic loci GPI, H, A1BG and PGD of the linkage group of 6th chromosomes. All piglets were subjected to the halothane test. In a group of 106 sows, the overall numbers of litters in HAL genotypes N/N, N/n and n/n were 5.68, 5.81 and 4.96, resp. The evaluation of the causes of sow disposal showed that the number of stress-susceptible n/n sows, culled due to reproductive disorders, was twice that of N/N sows. Within groups of individual genotypes, great variability was found to exist. This is a basis for successful breeding programmes with well-defined genotypes. The investigations into the reproductive performance revealed inferior parameters in stress-susceptible sows. With respect to HAL genotypes, the difference between sows, dominant N/N [11.8] and recessive n/n homozygotes [10.3], in the total number of births was 1.46 piglets and in the number of piglets weaned 0.73. Preweaning mortality of piglets in N/N, N/n, and n/n sows was 11.2, 8.6 and 9.7 %, resp. The analysis of reproduction in boars of HAL genotypes showed that the number of total births was best in n/n genotypes [11.3 piglets]. As for the number of piglets weaned, best were N/N boars [9.2 piglets]. The percentage of pre-weaning mortality of piglets from N/N, N/n and n/n boars was 8.3, 10.5 and 11.5, resp. The other part of the study gives results concerning reproduction in different combinations of parents af HAL genotypes. As for the total number of births, the best combination was N/n boars X N/N sows [11.8 piglets] and the worst N/N X n/n [10.4], the difference being 1.42 piglets per litter. The number of liveborn piglets was highest in n/n X N/N [11.1] and lowest in n/n X N/n [9.8], the difference being 1.17 piglets. As for the number of piglets weaned, N/n X N/N [9.8] was the best combination and N/n X X n/n [8.6] the worst one. The evaluation of the piglets weaned with respect only to the genotype of the sire or the dam showed that N/N genotypes were the best. However, their mutual combination took up the 7th position out of the 9 combinations studied. From the viewpoint of four reproductive indices (number of total births, live births, piglets weaned and litter weight at 21 days) studied in a breeding herd of Landrace pigs for 3 years, the combination of n/n boars with N/N sows gave the best results. Compared with other combinations of genotypes at the HAL locus, this combination was the second best in the number of total births, the best in the number of liveborn piglets, the second best in the number of piglets weaned and the best in litter weight. The results suggested that it became necessary to know HAL genotypes of breeding animals showing susceptibility to stress so that genotypes chosen might be suitable for the breeding goal.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 203
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [21] CORRELATED RESPONSES IN REPRODUCTIVE AND CARCASS TRAITS TO SELECTION FOR 200-DAY WEIGHT IN LANDRACE PIGS
    KUHLERS, DL
    JUNGST, SB
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1993, 71 (03) : 595 - 601
  • [22] Estimation of genetic parameters for reproductive traits in connectedness groups of Duroc, Landrace and Yorkshire pigs in China
    Zhang, Suoyu
    Zhang, Jinxin
    Olasege, Babatunde Shittu
    Ma, Peipei
    Qiu, Xiaotian
    Gao, Hong
    Wang, Changcun
    Wang, Yuan
    Zhang, Qin
    Yang, Hongjie
    Wang, Zhigang
    Ding, Xiangdong
    Pan, Yuchun
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2020, 137 (02) : 211 - 222
  • [23] Genetic Polymorphism of Microsatellite Loci and Their Association with Reproductive Traits in Ukrainian Meat Breed Pigs
    Lugovoy, S. I.
    Kharzinova, V. R.
    Kramarenko, S. S.
    Lykhach, A. V.
    Kramarenko, A. S.
    Lykhach, V. Ya.
    CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS, 2018, 52 (05) : 360 - 367
  • [24] Genetic Polymorphism of Microsatellite Loci and Their Association with Reproductive Traits in Ukrainian Meat Breed Pigs
    S. I. Lugovoy
    V. R. Kharzinova
    S. S. Kramarenko
    A. V. Lykhach
    A. S. Kramarenko
    V. Ya. Lykhach
    Cytology and Genetics, 2018, 52 : 360 - 367
  • [25] Effect of the oestrogen receptor (ESR) gene on reproductive traits of Large White, White Meaty and Landrace pigs
    Omelka, R
    Bauerová, M
    Mlynek, J
    Buchová, B
    Peskovicová, D
    Bulla, J
    CZECH JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 50 (06) : 249 - 253
  • [26] Breed and other effects on reproductive traits and breeding soundness categorization in young beef bulls in Florida
    Chenoweth, PJ
    Chase, CC
    Thatcher, MJD
    Wilcox, CJ
    Larsen, RE
    THERIOGENOLOGY, 1996, 46 (07) : 1159 - 1170
  • [27] PREDICTION OF THE HALOTHANE GENOTYPES WITH THE AID OF THE S, PHI, HAL, H, PO2, PGD HAPLOTYPES OF PARENTS AND OFFSPRING IN SWISS LANDRACE PIGS
    VOGELI, P
    KUHNE, R
    GERWIG, C
    KAUFMANN, A
    WYSSHAAR, M
    STRANZINGER, G
    ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 1988, 60 (01): : 24 - 37
  • [28] Influence of breed, sex and growth hormone and halothane genotypes on carcass composition and meat quality traits in pigs
    Franco, M. M.
    Antunes, R. C.
    Borges, M.
    Melo, E. O.
    Goulart, L. R.
    JOURNAL OF MUSCLE FOODS, 2008, 19 (01) : 34 - 49
  • [29] Estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for growth traits using random regression model in Landrace x desi crossbred pigs
    Chaudhary, Rajni
    Prakash, Ved
    Sailo, Lalrengpuii
    Singh, Akansha
    Karthikeyan, A.
    Bashir, Aamir
    Mondal, S. K.
    Sahoo, N. R.
    Kumar, Amit
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCES, 2019, 89 (10): : 1104 - 1108
  • [30] Environmental influence on reproductive traits of buffel grass facultative apomictic genotypes and its implication in plant breeding
    Sanchez, Miguel A.
    Bruno, Cecilia I.
    Quiroga, Mariana P.
    Grunberg, Karina A.
    Griffa, Sabrina M.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2023, 63 (06) : 3382 - 3392