MARRIAGE AND SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING IN GHANA

被引:0
|
作者
Addai, Isaac [1 ]
Opoku-Agyeman, Chris [2 ]
Amanfu, Sarah K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Lansing Community Coll, Dept English Humanities & Social Sci EHSS, Lansing, MI 48933 USA
[2] Univ Akron, Summit Coll, Business Management & Technol Dept, Akron, OH 44325 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Educ, Dept Social & Comparat Anal Educ SCAE, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
来源
关键词
Gender; Ghana; happiness; life satisfaction; marriage; subjective well-being;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study uses individual-level data from the 2005-2008 Ghana World Values Survey (n=1 533), to explore the extent to which marriage is associated with subjective well-being (SWB) in Ghana. The analyses are carried out at three levels: the first part presents the distribution of well-being measures (happiness and life satisfaction) among Ghanaians; the second uses the chi-square technique to assess the relationship between marital status and well-being measures by gender; the third probes the relative influence of marriage on happiness and life satisfaction, paying attention to the moderating effect of gender (included as an interaction term). The main finding is that marriage has a negative association with subjective well-being among Ghanaians. The multivariate results confirm that marriage undermines happiness and life satisfaction among Ghanaians. However, the effect is only statistically significant on happiness. The marriage and gender interaction term does not have a statistically significant effect on either happiness or life satisfaction. In addition, upon introduction of the interaction term into the happiness regression model, the significant negative effect of marriage on happiness changes to positive. An attempt is made to explain these findings, paying attention to the economic and socio-cultural context in which marriages occur in Ghana. Weaknesses, policy implications, and future direction for research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 79
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pleasures and subjective well-being
    Oishi, S
    Schimmack, U
    Diener, E
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2001, 15 (02) : 153 - 167
  • [42] AGE AND SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING
    Hansen, T.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2010, 50 : 190 - 190
  • [43] Weekends and Subjective Well-Being
    John F. Helliwell
    Shun Wang
    Social Indicators Research, 2014, 116 : 389 - 407
  • [44] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND AGE
    HORLEY, J
    LAVERY, JJ
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1995, 34 (02) : 275 - 282
  • [45] Culture and subjective well-being
    Mio, JS
    CONTEMPORARY PSYCHOLOGY-APA REVIEW OF BOOKS, 2003, 48 (02): : 195 - 197
  • [46] Law and Subjective Well-Being
    Ulen, Thomas S.
    UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW REVIEW, 2015, 82 (03): : 1753 - 1779
  • [47] Patience and subjective well-being
    Le Pargneux, Arthur
    Zeitoun, Hossam
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023, 30 (14) : 1923 - 1929
  • [48] Innovativeness and Subjective Well-Being
    Binder, Martin
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2013, 111 (02) : 561 - 578
  • [49] Individual Wealth and Subjective Financial Well-being in Marriage: Resource Integration or Separation?
    Lersch, Philipp M.
    JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2017, 79 (05) : 1211 - 1223
  • [50] ON THE STRUCTURE OF SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING
    CHAMBERLAIN, K
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 1988, 20 (06) : 581 - 604