MARRIAGE AND SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING IN GHANA

被引:0
|
作者
Addai, Isaac [1 ]
Opoku-Agyeman, Chris [2 ]
Amanfu, Sarah K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Lansing Community Coll, Dept English Humanities & Social Sci EHSS, Lansing, MI 48933 USA
[2] Univ Akron, Summit Coll, Business Management & Technol Dept, Akron, OH 44325 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Educ, Dept Social & Comparat Anal Educ SCAE, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
来源
关键词
Gender; Ghana; happiness; life satisfaction; marriage; subjective well-being;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study uses individual-level data from the 2005-2008 Ghana World Values Survey (n=1 533), to explore the extent to which marriage is associated with subjective well-being (SWB) in Ghana. The analyses are carried out at three levels: the first part presents the distribution of well-being measures (happiness and life satisfaction) among Ghanaians; the second uses the chi-square technique to assess the relationship between marital status and well-being measures by gender; the third probes the relative influence of marriage on happiness and life satisfaction, paying attention to the moderating effect of gender (included as an interaction term). The main finding is that marriage has a negative association with subjective well-being among Ghanaians. The multivariate results confirm that marriage undermines happiness and life satisfaction among Ghanaians. However, the effect is only statistically significant on happiness. The marriage and gender interaction term does not have a statistically significant effect on either happiness or life satisfaction. In addition, upon introduction of the interaction term into the happiness regression model, the significant negative effect of marriage on happiness changes to positive. An attempt is made to explain these findings, paying attention to the economic and socio-cultural context in which marriages occur in Ghana. Weaknesses, policy implications, and future direction for research are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 79
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Does More Attention to Subjective Well-Being Affect Subjective Well-Being?
    Ludwigs, Kai
    Lucas, Richard
    Burger, Martijn
    Veenhoven, Ruut
    Arends, Lidia
    APPLIED RESEARCH IN QUALITY OF LIFE, 2018, 13 (04) : 1055 - 1080
  • [22] A Theory of Subjective Well-Being
    Hersch, Gil
    ECONOMICS AND PHILOSOPHY, 2023, 39 (03) : 528 - 532
  • [23] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING IN AFRICA
    Botha, Ferdi
    Snowball, Jen
    AFRICAN REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE-AREF, 2015, 7 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [24] The science of subjective well-being
    Yates, Greg
    Price, Debbie
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADULT LEARNING, 2009, 49 (01) : 214 - 218
  • [25] Weekends and Subjective Well-Being
    Helliwell, John F.
    Wang, Shun
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2014, 116 (02) : 389 - 407
  • [26] Subjective Well-Being and Policy
    Bruno S. Frey
    Jana Gallus
    Topoi, 2013, 32 : 207 - 212
  • [27] Innovativeness and Subjective Well-Being
    Martin Binder
    Social Indicators Research, 2013, 111 : 561 - 578
  • [28] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING AND EVENTS
    Yu, Nanyi Nicole
    Mair, Judith
    Lee, Andy
    Ong, Faith
    EVENT MANAGEMENT, 2022, 26 (01): : 7 - 24
  • [29] Subjective positive well-being
    Bech, Per
    WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 11 (02) : 105 - 106
  • [30] Culture and subjective well-being
    Brinkman, R
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2002, 36 (03) : 830 - 833