DISPOSABLE ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY FORCEPS - COMPARISON WITH STANDARD FORCEPS OF SAMPLE-SIZE AND ADEQUACY OF SPECIMEN

被引:19
|
作者
TURK, DJ [1 ]
KOZAREK, RA [1 ]
BOTOMAN, VA [1 ]
PATTERSON, DJ [1 ]
BALL, TJ [1 ]
机构
[1] VIRGINIA MASON MED CTR,THERAPEUT ENDOSCOPY SECT,POB 900,SEATTLE,WA 98111
关键词
BIOPSY; FORCEPS; HISTOLOGY; ENDOSCOPY;
D O I
10.1097/00004836-199102000-00016
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Disposable biopsy forceps have recently been introduced into the field of endoscopy. We have analyzed biopsy size and histologic interpretation of samples obtained with the disposable forceps and compared them to those obtained with reusable forceps. In the 18 patients studied, 49 samples were collected with the reusable forceps and 47 samples with the disposable. Biopsy sites included the colorectum in 50%, esophagus in 22%, small bowel in 17%, and stomach in 11% of the patients. We found that statistically smaller samples were collected by the disposable biopsy forceps than by the reusable (2.48 +/- 1.11 mm versus 1.99 +/- 0.55 mm, p = 0.006). The smaller biopsy size with disposable forceps was not clinically important since all but one of 47 specimens were interpreted as adequate for histologic diagnosis. The convenience, potential cost savings, and prevention of the spread of communicable agents afforded by disposable biopsy forceps make them a possible alternative to conventional forcepts in some clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 78
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Performance of disposable endoscopic forceps according to the manufacturing techniques
    Kwon, Chang-Il
    Kim, Gwangil
    Moon, Jong Pil
    Yun, Ho
    Ko, Weon Jin
    Cho, Joo Young
    Hong, Sung Pyo
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2019, 34 (03): : 530 - 538
  • [32] The discrepancy in pathology results between endoscopic forceps biopsy and resected specimen of colorectal polyp
    Kim, Kyeong Ok
    Jeong, Da Eun
    Kim, Kook Hyun
    Lee, Si Hyung
    Jang, Byung Ik
    Kim, Tae Nyeun
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 31 : 204 - 204
  • [33] Diagnostic quality of biopsy specimens: comparison between a conventional biopsy forceps and Multibite forceps
    Fantin, AC
    Neuweiler, J
    Binek, JS
    Suter, WR
    Meyenberger, C
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 54 (05) : 600 - 604
  • [34] COMPARISON OF A NEW LARGE-CAPACITY BIOPSY FORCEPS TO A STANDARD FORCEPS - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED STUDY
    SEE, JA
    CALLARD, P
    BODIN, F
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (04) : 329 - 329
  • [35] HISTOLOGIC DISCREPANCY BETWEEN ENDOSCOPIC FORCEPS BIOPSY AND ENDOSCOPIC RESECTION SPECIMEN IN SUPERFICIAL ESOPHAGEAL SQUAMOUS NEOPLASMS
    Park, Youngjoo
    Lee, Bong Eun
    Baek, Dong Hoon
    Song, Geun Am
    Kim, Gwang Ha
    Park, Eun Young
    Park, Sang Gyu
    Park, Suk Ki
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 87 (06) : AB551 - AB552
  • [36] Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Comparison of Endoscopic Transpapillary Brush Cytology an Forceps Biopsy
    von Weyhern, C. Hann
    Weber, A.
    Schneider, J.
    Neu, B.
    Meining, A.
    Weidenbach, H.
    Schmid, R. M.
    Fend, F.
    Prinz, C.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2009, 89 : 132A - 132A
  • [37] Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Comparison of Endoscopic Transpapillary Brush Cytology an Forceps Biopsy
    von Weyhern, C. Hann
    Weber, A.
    Schneider, J.
    Neu, B.
    Meining, A.
    Weidenbach, H.
    Schmid, R. M.
    Fend, F.
    Prinz, C.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2009, 22 : 132A - 132A
  • [38] PEDIATRIC AND STANDARD-SIZE ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY FORCEPS MAY MISS GASTRIC-CARCINOMA WITH SIMILAR FREQUENCY
    MADDEN, MV
    PRICE, SK
    BOYD, EJS
    DENT, DM
    SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1985, 68 (07): : 517 - 517
  • [39] COMPARISON OF QUALITY AND DIAGNOSTIC ADEQUACY OF CANINE DUODENAL MUCOSAL BIOPSY SPECIMENS OBTAINED WITH DIFFERENT ENDOSCOPIC FORCEPS IN 17 DOGS
    Goutal, C.
    Mansell, J.
    Ryan, K.
    Gaschen, F.
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 26 (03) : 768 - 768
  • [40] Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps: A prospective evaluation of costs
    Kozarek, RA
    Raltz, SL
    Merriam, LD
    Sumida, SE
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (01) : 10 - 13