DISPOSABLE ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY FORCEPS - COMPARISON WITH STANDARD FORCEPS OF SAMPLE-SIZE AND ADEQUACY OF SPECIMEN

被引:19
|
作者
TURK, DJ [1 ]
KOZAREK, RA [1 ]
BOTOMAN, VA [1 ]
PATTERSON, DJ [1 ]
BALL, TJ [1 ]
机构
[1] VIRGINIA MASON MED CTR,THERAPEUT ENDOSCOPY SECT,POB 900,SEATTLE,WA 98111
关键词
BIOPSY; FORCEPS; HISTOLOGY; ENDOSCOPY;
D O I
10.1097/00004836-199102000-00016
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Disposable biopsy forceps have recently been introduced into the field of endoscopy. We have analyzed biopsy size and histologic interpretation of samples obtained with the disposable forceps and compared them to those obtained with reusable forceps. In the 18 patients studied, 49 samples were collected with the reusable forceps and 47 samples with the disposable. Biopsy sites included the colorectum in 50%, esophagus in 22%, small bowel in 17%, and stomach in 11% of the patients. We found that statistically smaller samples were collected by the disposable biopsy forceps than by the reusable (2.48 +/- 1.11 mm versus 1.99 +/- 0.55 mm, p = 0.006). The smaller biopsy size with disposable forceps was not clinically important since all but one of 47 specimens were interpreted as adequate for histologic diagnosis. The convenience, potential cost savings, and prevention of the spread of communicable agents afforded by disposable biopsy forceps make them a possible alternative to conventional forcepts in some clinical settings.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 78
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ejection biopsy forceps: Two novel forceps with distal specimen ejection mechanisms
    Nakao, NL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (10): : S299 - S299
  • [22] Comparison of Transbronchial Lung Biopsy Yield between Standard Forceps and Electrocautery Hot Forceps in Swine
    Wahidi, Momen M.
    Shofer, Scott L.
    Sporn, Thomas A.
    Ernst, Armin
    RESPIRATION, 2010, 79 (02) : 137 - 140
  • [23] Strip biopsy and standard biopsy forceps: A comparison of mass of tissue obtained
    Hepworth, CC
    Kadirkamanathan, SS
    Gong, F
    Bewick, E
    Swain, CP
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (04) : 21 - 21
  • [24] Comparison of performance abilities of disposable endoscopic forceps according to the manufacturing techniques
    Kwon, Chang-Il
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 32 : 229 - 230
  • [25] Endoscopic removal of mucus by standard biopsy forceps in a patient with gastric cancer
    Guo, Zhuang
    Wang, Wenhao
    Kuang-I, Fu
    Cui, Zhenqin
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (06) : 2579 - 2580
  • [26] PERFORMANCE TESTING OF ENDOSCOPIC BIOPSY FORCEPS
    Linke, Barbara S.
    Toribio, Anthony
    Geary, Shannon
    Neumann, Ulf P.
    Roeth, Anjali A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 13TH INTERNATIONAL MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 1, 2018,
  • [27] GASTRIC BIOPSY - A COMPARISON OF BIOPSY FORCEPS
    SIEGEL, M
    BARKIN, JS
    ROGERS, AI
    THOMSEN, S
    CLARK, R
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1983, 29 (01) : 35 - 36
  • [28] A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable versus disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: A prospective randomized trial.
    Rizzo, J
    Bernstein, DE
    Tripodi, J
    Gress, F
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 47 (04) : AB58 - AB58
  • [29] Comparing the Histological Quality of Endoscopic Biopsy Samples Obtained Using a Novel Multiple Sample Forceps vs Conventional Forceps
    Inthiran, Anjena
    Comishen, Kyle
    Grin, Andrea
    Hurlbut, David
    Hussey, Amanda
    Rai, Mandip
    Anvari, Homai
    Mckay, Jackie
    Hookey, Lawrence
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 118 (10): : S536 - S537
  • [30] STANDARD BIOPSY FORCEPS VERSUS LARGE-CAPACITY FORCEPS WITH AND WITHOUT NEEDLE
    BERNSTEIN, DE
    BARKIN, JS
    REINER, DK
    LUBIN, J
    PHILLIPS, RS
    GRAUER, L
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (06) : 573 - 576