CONSTRAINTS ON HYDROSTATIC MODELS OF SOFT GAMMA-RAY REPEATERS

被引:0
|
作者
MILLER, MC
机构
来源
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL | 1995年 / 448卷 / 01期
关键词
GAMMA RAYS; BURSTS; MAGNETIC FIELDS; RADIATIVE TRANSFER; STARS; NEUTRON;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
All three soft gamma-ray repeaters (SGRs) are associated with supernova remnants; consequently, models of SGRs involving young neutron stars have attracted close attention. From the distances to the supernova remnants and the observed burst fluxes, the luminosity of a typical burst from an SGR is similar to 10(41)-10(42) ergs s(-1); the 1979 March 5 event from SGR 0526-66 had an inferred peak luminosity of similar to 5 X 10(43) ergs s(-1). These luminosities are orders of magnitude larger than the Eddington luminosity L(E) similar to 2 x 10(38) ergs s(-1) for a neutron star. Many models of SGRs assume that the atmosphere is hydrostatic. To reconcile this requirement with the large luminosities of SGRs, it has been suggested that the neutron stars that produce SGRs have extremely high magnetic fields. Then for a photon with frequency omega much less than the electron cyclotron frequency omega(c), the scattering cross section (and thus the radial radiation force) in the perpendicular polarization mode is decreased by a factor similar to (omega/omega(c))2 compared to the magnetic field B = 0 case. It has been assumed that if essentially all of the radiation emerges in the perpendicular mode, then the maximum hydrostatic luminosity rises to L(crit) similar to (omega(c)/omega)(2)L(E). Thus, to allow a hydrostatic atmosphere for a burst luminosity similar to 10(42) ergs s(-1) and a typical photon energy h omega similar to 50 keV, it has been thought that a magnetic field B similar to 5 x 10(14) G would suffice. We show that this is nor correct. Although most of the luminosity emerges in the perpendicular mode, the fraction similar to (omega/omega(c)) that scatters into the parallel mode dominates the radiation force. Hence the maximum luminosity is only L(crit) similar to 5(omega(c)/omega) L(E). Thus, for a typical SGR burst, the magnetic field must be at least B similar to 10(16) G to ensure a hydrostatic atmosphere, and for the March 5 event B > 5 x 10(18) G is required. These field strengths are unreasonably high. We therefore suggest that SGRs do not have hydrostatic atmospheres and that models which invoke magnetic confinement are more promising.
引用
收藏
页码:L29 / L32
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Are anomalous X-ray pulsars and soft gamma-ray repeaters magnetars?
    Ya. I. Istomin
    B. V. Komberg
    Astronomy Reports, 2000, 44 : 754 - 758
  • [33] Soft gamma-ray repeaters as observed by the HETE-2 WXM
    Torii, K
    Yoshida, A
    Kawai, N
    Shirasaki, Y
    Tamagawa, T
    Sakamoto, T
    Matsuoko, A
    Fenimore, E
    Galassi, A
    Atteia, JL
    Hurley, K
    Butler, N
    Lamb, DQ
    Graziani, C
    Donaghy, T
    Vanderspek, R
    Ricker, G
    GAMMA-RAY BURST AND AFTERGLOW ASTRONOMY 2001, 2003, 662 : 111 - 113
  • [34] Imprints of Superfluidity on Magnetoelastic Quasiperiodic Oscillations of Soft Gamma-Ray Repeaters
    Gabler, Michael
    Cerda-Duran, Pablo
    Stergioulas, Nikolaos
    Font, Jose A.
    Mueller, Ewald
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2013, 111 (21)
  • [35] Magnetic deformation of magnetars for the giant flares of the soft gamma-ray repeaters
    Ioka, K
    MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2001, 327 (02) : 639 - 662
  • [37] An in-depth study of magnetospheric emission in soft gamma-ray repeaters
    Fatuzzo, M
    Melia, F
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 464 (01): : 316 - 331
  • [38] A strongly magnetized strange star model for soft gamma-ray repeaters
    Cheng, KS
    Dai, ZG
    ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2002, 16 (03) : 277 - 284
  • [39] Anomalous X-ray pulsars and soft gamma-ray repeaters in supernova remnants
    Gaensler, BM
    PULSAR ASTRONOMY - 2000 AND BEYOND: IAU COLLOQUIUM 177, 2000, 202 : 703 - 706
  • [40] Anomalous X-ray pulsars and soft gamma-ray repeaters in supernova remnants
    Gaensler, BM
    Slane, PO
    Gotthelf, EV
    Vasisht, G
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 559 (02): : 963 - 972