Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire's strengths and limitations as a practice and evaluation tool in social work

被引:1
|
作者
O'Neill, Emma [1 ]
机构
[1] Presbyterian Support Northern, Auckland, New Zealand
来源
AOTEAROA NEW ZEALAND SOCIAL WORK | 2018年 / 30卷 / 02期
关键词
strengths and difficulties questionnaire; social work practice; client behavioural screening; needs identification; evaluating client outcomes;
D O I
10.11157/anzswj-vol30iss2id403
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is an internationally recognised psychometric and behavioural screening tool. The Ministry of Social Development (MSD) have endorsed the SDQ as the primary behavioural screening and client outcome evaluation tool for the Social Workers in Schools (SWiS) service in 2018. The usefulness of the SDQ in social work practice and in evaluating client outcomes, however, remains unclear. This study explored two years of aggregated Youth Workers in Secondary Schools (YWiSS) SDQ scores to understand what client outcomes could be evidenced. This study further reflects on SDQs as a contractually mandated practice tool and their appropriateness in social work practice. METHOD: Data were collected from the Family Works Northern (FWN) YWiSS database. Data modelling and analysis tested what aggregated client, parent and teacher SDQ scores communicated for changes in clients' behavioural difficulties at service entry, mid-point and exit. FINDINGS: Analysis of two years of YWiSS client, parent and teacher SDQ scores aggregated at a service level provided inconsistent evidence of client need and outcomes by SDQ thematic categories. A number of factors, including the SDQ being voluntary, clients exiting service early and the challenge of asking the same teachers and parents to complete an SDQ, meant that there were very few SDQ scores completed by all parties at the service exit point, following a two-year intervention. CONCLUSION: The findings in this research suggest that the SDQ as a standalone behavioural screening and outcome evaluation tool within social work is limited. Aggregated YWiSS SDQ results provided limited insights about the complexity of client needs or any intervention outcomes to practitioners, social service providers and funders. The use of SDQ in social work requires further scrutiny to test its ability to communicate a client's level of need and any intervention outcomes to these stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:28 / 41
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Mental Health Screening Tool for Newly Arrived Pediatric Refugees
    Green, Andrea E.
    Weinberger, Stanley J.
    Harder, Valerie S.
    JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH, 2021, 23 (03) : 494 - 501
  • [32] The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a Mental Health Screening Tool for Newly Arrived Pediatric Refugees
    Andrea E. Green
    Stanley J. Weinberger
    Valerie S. Harder
    Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 2021, 23 : 494 - 501
  • [33] Internal consistency of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Amazonian children
    Giacomini, Isabel
    Martins, Maria Rosario O.
    Matijasevich, Alicia
    Cardoso, Marly A.
    REVISTA DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2023, 57 : 4s
  • [34] Linking the Child Behavior Checklist to the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Mansolf, Maxwell
    Blackwell, Courtney K.
    Cummings, Peter
    Choi, Seohyun
    Cella, David
    PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 34 (03) : 233 - 246
  • [35] Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the "Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire"
    Smedje, H
    Broman, JE
    Hetta, J
    von Knorring, AL
    EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 8 (02) : 63 - 70
  • [36] Comparison of parent adolescent scores on Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Arman, Soroor
    Amel, Afsaneh Karbasi
    Maracy, Mohamad Reza
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 18 (06): : 501 - 505
  • [37] Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the “Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire”
    H. Smedje
    J.-E. Broman
    J. Hetta
    A.-L. von Knorring
    European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 1999, 8 : 63 - 70
  • [38] Interparent Agreement on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A Chinese Study
    Mellor, David
    Wong, Jessica
    Xu, Xiaoyan
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 40 (06): : 890 - 896
  • [39] A Comparison of Paper and Computer Administered Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Praveetha Patalay
    Daniel Hayes
    Jessica Deighton
    Miranda Wolpert
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2016, 38 : 242 - 250
  • [40] Australian data and psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
    Hawes, DJ
    Dadds, MR
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 38 (08): : 644 - 651