National innovative capacity as determinant in sustainable development: a comparison between the BRICS and G7 countries

被引:20
|
作者
Santana, Naja Brandao [1 ]
Mariano, Enzo Barberio [2 ]
Camiot, Flavia de Castro [3 ]
do Nascimento Rebelatto, Daisy Aparecida [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Prod Engn Dept, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ, Prod Engn Dept, Av Eng Luiz Edmundo C Coube 14-01, BR-17033360 Bauru, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Triangulo Mineiro, Prod Engn Dept, BR-38025180 Uberaba, MG, Brazil
关键词
DEA; data envelopment analysis; sustainable development; national innovative capacity; BRICS; G7; triple index; windows analysis; efficiency;
D O I
10.1504/IJISD.2015.071860
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In the current scenario of economic growth, technological innovation can be used as a promoter of new production alternatives that can be less damaging to nature, which can allow countries to continue to produce without this being considered a threat to society. The main objective of this paper is to analyse the efficiency of the BRICS and of the G7 countries to convert national innovative capacity into economic, environmental and social development, from 2000 to 2008. To this end, we used the window analysis and the triple index of the data envelopment analysis (DEA). This work concluded, considering the variables adopted, that the European countries, especially Italy, France, Brazil and the UK are the most efficient. However, according to the analysis, the USA, China and Russian Federation were the most inefficient.
引用
收藏
页码:384 / 405
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of disciplinary structure in science between the G7 and the BRIC countries by bibliometric methods
    Li Ying Yang
    Ting Yue
    Jie Lan Ding
    Tao Han
    Scientometrics, 2012, 93 : 497 - 516
  • [32] Soft power and global health: the sustainable development goals (SDGs) era health agendas of the G7, G20 and BRICS
    Bronwyn McBride
    Sarah Hawkes
    Kent Buse
    BMC Public Health, 19
  • [33] Soft power and global health: the sustainable development goals (SDGs) era health agendas of the G7, G20 and BRICS
    McBride, Bronwyn
    Hawkes, Sarah
    Buse, Kent
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2019, 19 (1)
  • [34] DOES MILITARY SPENDING PROMOTE SOCIAL WELFARE? A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE BRICS AND G7 COUNTRIES
    Zhang, Ying
    Liu, Xiaoxing
    Xu, Jiaxin
    Wang, Rui
    DEFENCE AND PEACE ECONOMICS, 2017, 28 (06) : 686 - 702
  • [35] The Relationship Between Military Expenditures, Financial Development and Environmental Pollution in G7 Countries
    Konuk, Filiz
    Kaya, Emine
    Akpinar, Sema
    Yildiz, Sule
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (01) : 1087 - 1102
  • [36] Is the Gap in Scientific and Technological Strength Between G7 and BRICS Becoming Smaller or Larger?
    Yuan Junpeng
    Gao Jiping
    Su Cheng
    Zhai Lihua
    Wang Haiyan
    Pan Yuntao
    16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTOMETRICS & INFORMETRICS (ISSI 2017), 2017, : 1647 - 1648
  • [37] VOLATILITY SPILLOVERS BETWEEN EQUITY AND BOND MARKETS: EVIDENCE FROM G7 AND BRICS
    Zhang, Jian
    Zhang, Dongxiang
    Wang, Juan
    Zhang, Yue
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC FORECASTING, 2013, 16 (04): : 205 - 217
  • [38] Real GDP growth rates and healthcare spending – comparison between the G7 and the EM7 countries
    Mihajlo Jakovljevic
    Yuriy Timofeyev
    Chhabi Lal Ranabhat
    Paula Odete Fernandes
    João Paulo Teixeira
    Nemanja Rancic
    Vladimir Reshetnikov
    Globalization and Health, 16
  • [39] Monetary policy uncertainty and stock returns in G7 and BRICS countries: A quantile-on-quantile approach
    Wen, Fenghua
    Shui, Aojie
    Cheng, Yuxiang
    Gong, Xu
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2022, 78 : 457 - 482
  • [40] Effect of Exchange Rate Volatility on Export Volume in BRICS and G7 Countries: Panel Data Analysis
    Morcicek, Zeynep
    EKOIST-JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS AND STATISTICS, 2024, (41): : 1 - 12