Impact of climate-change risk-coping strategies on livestock productivity and household welfare: empirical evidence from Pakistan

被引:37
|
作者
Bahadur Rahut, Dil [1 ]
Ali, Akhter [2 ]
机构
[1] Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Carretera Mexico Veracruz Km 45, El Batan, Texcoco, Mexico
[2] NARC, Int Maize & Wheat Improvement Ctr CIMMYT, Pk Rd, Islamabad, Pakistan
关键词
Environmental science; Agriculture;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00797
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Using the primary datasets collected from 700 livestock farmers from all four major provinces of Pakistan and Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) and Gilgit Baltistan, this paper analyzes the impact of climate-change risk coping strategies on household welfare. A Poisson regression model was used to estimate the determinants of the livestock ownership and multivariate probit model to assess the determinants of the measures taken to manage the climatic-risk challenge for livestock. A propensity score matching approach (PSM) was used to assess the impact of the adopted climate-risk management strategies on livestock farmers. Findings indicated that in Pakistan livestock farmers generally adopt four main types of strategies to cope with climate risk: livestock insurance, selling of livestock, allocation of more land area for fodder and migration. The results show that age, education, wealth, access to extension services, and membership in NGOs, influence the livestock farmers' choice of climate-risk-coping mechanisms. The livestock farmers who adopted risk-coping mechanisms generally fared better. Increasing the land area allocated to fodder seems to increase production of milk and butter, resulting in higher income and lower poverty levels. Those who bought insurance had more milk production and a lower poverty level, while those who sold livestock to cope with climate risk decreased production but increased household income and lowered poverty levels. Migration seems to have a negative impact on production and income. Impact assessments confirm that purchasing livestock insurance and increasing fodder areas are more effective compared to the selling of livestock and migration. Agricultural climate policy should focus on creating awareness as well as increasing access to extension services among livestock farmers on climate risk and risk-coping strategies to mitigate the impact on rural livelihoods.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impacts of livelihood assets on adaptation strategies in response to climate change: evidence from Pakistan
    Sargani, Ghulam Raza
    Jiang, Yuansheng
    Chandio, Abbas Ali
    Shen, Yun
    Ding, Zhao
    Ali, Asif
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 25 (07) : 6117 - 6140
  • [32] Climate change adaption strategies in urban communities: new evidence from Islamabad, Pakistan
    Naeem Ahmed
    Ihtsham Ul Haq Padda
    Azra Khan
    Maria Daniela Otil
    Laura Mariana Cismas
    Andra Miculescu
    Abdul Rehman
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, 30 : 42108 - 42121
  • [33] The productivity impact of climate change: Evidence from Australia's Millennium drought
    Sheng, Yu
    Xu, Xinpeng
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2019, 76 : 182 - 191
  • [34] Does youth participation in the farming program impact farm productivity and household welfare? Evidence from Nigeria
    Daudu, Abdulrazaq K.
    Abdoulaye, Tahirou
    Bamba, Zoumana
    Shuaib, Suleiman B.
    Awotide, Bola A.
    HELIYON, 2023, 9 (04)
  • [35] Climate Change and Its Impact on the Yield of Major Food Crops: Evidence from Pakistan
    Ali, Sajjad
    Liu, Ying
    Ishaq, Muhammad
    Shah, Tariq
    Abdullah
    Ilyas, Aasir
    Din, Izhar Ud
    FOODS, 2017, 6 (06) : 1 - 19
  • [36] DETERMINANTS OF FARMERS' CHOICE ADAPTATION STRATEGIES TO CLIMATE CHANGE: EVIDENCE FROM KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA PAKISTAN
    Ali, Uzair
    Wang, Jing
    Ullah, Arif
    Tan, Yongfeng
    Nurgazina, Zhanar
    Khan, Zaid Ashiq
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 2020, 57 (03): : 941 - 951
  • [37] Unpacking the Levels of Household and Individual Climate Change Adaptation: Empirical Evidence from Leeds, United Kingdom
    Ume, Chukwuma Otum
    Onah, Ogochukwu
    Adeosun, Kehinde Paul
    Nnamdi, Onyekwe Chris
    Ihedioha, Nice Nneoma
    Onyia, Chukwuemeka
    Idika, Ezinne Orie
    WEATHER CLIMATE AND SOCIETY, 2020, 12 (03) : 501 - 513
  • [38] Asymmetries in climate change and livestock productivity: non-linear evidence from autoregressive distribution lag mode
    Khurshid, Nabila
    Ajab, Salman
    Tabash, Mosab I.
    Barbulescu, Marinela
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [39] Climate change adaptation and smallholder farmers welfare: Empirical evidence from the Sahelian Region of West Africa
    Bello, Lateef Olalekan
    Awotide, Bola Amoke
    Sakurai, Takeshi
    LAND USE POLICY, 2024, 142
  • [40] Climate Change Adaptation Strategies and Its Impact on Household Vulnerability to Food Insecurity: A Micro-Level Evidence from Southwest Ethiopia
    Begashaw, Andualem
    Ketema, Mengistu
    Mehare, Abule
    Yami, Mesay
    Feleke, Shiferaw
    Abdoulaye, Tahirou
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (13)