Consumers' willingness to pay for ethical attributes

被引:24
|
作者
Mai, Li-Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Westminster Business Sch, Dept Mkt & Business Strategy, Dept Mkt, London, England
关键词
Attitudes; Consumer behaviour; Field research;
D O I
10.1108/MIP-08-2013-0139
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose-In recent years, there has been a big increase in the use of ethical attributes as marketing appeals. The purpose of this paper is to examine consumers' willingness to pay for three selected ethical attributes, namely "Organic", " Recyclable Packaging" and "Fairtrade" in monetary terms. Design/methodology/approach -A modified choice-based experimental design with manipulation of the key constructs was used to estimate the mean value of how much consumers are willing to pay for the selected attributes attached to a box of premium chocolates. The results are based on the responses of a total of 208 consumers. Findings-Of the three attributes, " Recyclable Packaging" has the strongest influence on the purchase decision, although this attribute generates the least additional value. The aggregated result shows that although consumers are willing to pay more for the product with ethical attributes than the one that is without, still around a half of them are not willing to pay more. In terms of demographics, the results show no significant differences between the two genders or different age groups in their willingness to pay for ethical attributes. As might be expected, willingness to pay was correlated with the level of consciousness of the ethical attributes. Originality/value-The findings of this study help management to think practically about the value consumers willing to pay for the selected attributes. The results show a significant synergy in a combination of ethical attributes in products.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / +
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Analyzing German consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity tariff attributes: a discrete choice experiment
    Danne, M.
    Meier-Sauthoff, S.
    Musshoff, O.
    ENERGY SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIETY, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [32] This is not my jam: an Italian choice experiment on the influence of typical product attributes on consumers' willingness to pay
    Boccia, Flavio
    Alvino, Letizia
    Covino, Daniela
    NUTRITION & FOOD SCIENCE, 2024, 54 (01): : 13 - 32
  • [33] Chinese and Thai consumers' willingness to pay for quality rice attributes: a discrete choice experiment method
    Boonkong, Achara
    Jiang, Baichen
    Kassoh, Fallah Samuel
    Srisukwatanachai, Tanapon
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2023, 7
  • [34] Analyzing German consumers’ willingness to pay for green electricity tariff attributes: a discrete choice experiment
    M. Danne
    S. Meier-Sauthoff
    O. Musshoff
    Energy, Sustainability and Society, 11
  • [35] Do consumers like food product innovation? An analysis of willingness to pay for innovative food attributes
    Nazzaro, Concetta
    Lerro, Marco
    Stanco, Marcello
    Marotta, Giuseppe
    BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2019, 121 (06): : 1413 - 1427
  • [36] Chinese consumers' preferences and willingness to pay for traceable food quality and safety attributes: The case of pork
    Wu, Linhai
    Wang, Shuxian
    Zhu, Dian
    Hu, Wuyang
    Wang, Hongsha
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2015, 35 : 121 - 136
  • [37] Willingness to Pay: Australian Consumers and "On the Farm" Welfare
    Taylor, Nik
    Signal, Tania D.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL WELFARE SCIENCE, 2009, 12 (04) : 345 - 359
  • [38] Consumers' willingness to pay for organic products in Thailand
    Sriwaranun, Yaowarat
    Gan, Christopher
    Lee, Minsoo
    Cohen, David A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 42 (05) : 480 - 510
  • [39] Measuring consumers' willingness to pay at the point of purchase
    Wertenbroch, K
    Skiera, B
    JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2002, 39 (02) : 228 - 241
  • [40] Consumers' Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Personalised Nutrition
    Perez-Troncoso, Daniel
    Epstein, David M.
    Castaneda-Garcia, Jose A.
    APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY, 2021, 19 (05) : 757 - 767