Using Coverage as a Model Building Constraint in Learning Classifier Systems

被引:18
|
作者
Greene, David Perry [1 ]
Smith, Stephen F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Inst Robot, Sch Comp Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1162/evco.1994.2.1.67
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Promoting and maintaining diversity is a critical requirement of search in learning classifier systems (LCSs). What is required of the genetic algorithm (GA) in an LCS context is not convergence to a single global maximum, as in the standard optimization framework, but instead the generation of individuals (i.e., rules) that collectively cover the overall problem space. COGIN (Coverage-based Genetic INduction) is a system designed to exploit genetic recombination for the purpose of constructing rule-based classification models from examples. The distinguishing characteristic of COGIN is its use of coverage of training set examples as an explicit constraint on the search, which acts to promote appropriate diversity in the population of rules over time. By treating training examples as limited resources, COGIN creates an ecological model that simultaneously accommodates a dynamic range of niches while encouraging superior individuals within a niche, leading to concise and accurate decision models. Previous experimental studies with COGTN have demonstrated its performance advantages over several well-known symbolic induction approaches. In this paper, we examine the effects of two modifications to the original system configuration, each designed to inject additional diversity into the search: increasing the carrying capacity of training set examples (i.e., increasing coverage redundancy) and increasing the level of disruption in the recombination operator used to generate new rules. Experimental results are given that show both types of modifications to yield substantial improvements to previously published results.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 91
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Learning reactive behavior for autonomous robots using classifier systems
    Sanchis, A
    Molina, JM
    Isasi, P
    SPATIOTEMPORAL MODELS IN BIOLOGICAL AND ARTIFICIAL SYSTEMS, 1997, 37 : 152 - 159
  • [22] Learning classifier systems: a survey
    Sigaud, Olivier
    Wilson, Stewart W.
    SOFT COMPUTING, 2007, 11 (11) : 1065 - 1078
  • [23] Learning classifier systems: then and now
    Lanzi, Pier Luca
    EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, 2008, 1 (01) : 63 - 82
  • [24] Symbiogenesis in learning classifier systems
    Tomlinson, A
    Bull, L
    ARTIFICIAL LIFE, 2001, 7 (01) : 33 - 61
  • [25] Learning classifier systems resources
    T. Kovacs
    Soft Computing, 2002, 6 (3) : 240 - 243
  • [26] Learning classifier systems: a survey
    Olivier Sigaud
    Stewart W. Wilson
    Soft Computing, 2007, 11 : 1065 - 1078
  • [27] Building a Machine Learning Classifier for Malware Detection
    Markel, Zane
    Bilzor, Michael
    2014 SECOND WORKSHOP ON ANTI-MALWARE TESTING RESEARCH (WATER), 2014, : 20 - 23
  • [28] A learning model for intelligent agents based on classifier systems and approximate reasoning
    Baghdadchi, J
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 39TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL, VOLS 1-5, 2000, : 3433 - 3438
  • [29] Constraint Driven Model Using Correlation and Collaborative Filtering for Sustainable Building
    Ha, Hsin-Yu
    Chen, Shu-Ching
    Zhu, Yimin
    Luis, Steven
    Graham, Scott
    Vassigh, Shahin
    2012 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION REUSE AND INTEGRATION (IRI), 2012, : 309 - 315
  • [30] Learning classifier systems for user context learning
    Shankar, A
    Louis, S
    2005 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-3, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 2069 - 2075