Reproducible science: what, why, how

被引:8
|
作者
Rodriguez-Sanchez, F. [1 ]
Perez-Luque, A. J. [2 ]
Bartomeus, I. [1 ]
Varela, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, EBD, Dept Ecol Integrat, Avda Americo Vespucio S-N, E-41092 Seville, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Inst Interuniv Sistema Tierra CEAMA, Lab Ecol iEcolab, Avda Mediterraneo S-N, Granada 18006, Spain
[3] Univ Alcala, Fac Biol Ciencias Ambientales & Quim, Dept Ciencias Vida, Ctra Madrid Barcelona,Km 33,600, Madrid 28805, Spain
来源
ECOSISTEMAS | 2016年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
data analysis; ecoinformatics; ecology; open science; programming; R; reproducibility;
D O I
10.7818/ECOS.2016.25-2.11
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Most scientific papers are not reproducible: it is really hard, if not impossible, to understand how results are derived from data, and being able to regenerate them in the future (even by the same researchers). However, traceability and reproducibility of results are indispensable elements of high-quality science, and an increasing requirement of many journals and funding sources. Reproducible studies include code able to regenerate results from the original data. This practice not only provides a perfect record of the whole analysis but also reduces the probability of errors and facilitates code reuse, thus accelerating scientific progress. But doing reproducible science also brings many benefits to the individual researcher, including saving time and effort, improved collaborations, and higher quality and impact of final publications. In this article we introduce reproducible science, why it is important, and how we can improve the reproducibility of our work. We introduce principles and tools for data management, analysis, version control, and software management that help us achieve reproducible workflows in the context of ecology.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 92
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Implementation science for dietitians: The 'what, why and how' using multiple case studies
    Young, Adrienne M.
    Hickman, Ingrid
    Campbell, Katrina
    Wilkinson, Shelley A.
    NUTRITION & DIETETICS, 2021, 78 (03) : 276 - 285
  • [22] How We Teach Science: What's Changed, and Why It Matters.
    Baram-Tsabari, Ayelet
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2020, 29 (08) : 892 - 893
  • [23] Why, how and what Primary Science Pre-service teachers evaluate?
    Lopez-Lozano, Lidia
    Solis-Ramirez, Emilio
    REVISTA EUREKA SOBRE ENSENANZA Y DIVULGACION DE LAS CIENCIAS, 2016, 13 (01): : 102 - 120
  • [24] HOW WE TEACH SCIENCE: WHAT'S CHANGED, AND WHY IT MATTERS.
    Dellureficio, Anthony J.
    QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 2020, 95 (01): : 96 - 96
  • [25] How We Teach Science: What's Changed, and Why It Matters.
    Cowles, Henry M.
    ISIS, 2020, 111 (02) : 424 - 425
  • [26] How We Teach Science: What's Changed, and Why It Matters.
    Braaten, Melissa
    HISTORY OF EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2020, 60 (02) : 276 - 278
  • [27] The Quest for Ecological Validity in Hearing Science: What It Is, Why It Matters, and How to Advance It
    Keidser, Gitte
    Naylor, Graham
    Brungart, Douglas S.
    Caduff, Andreas
    Campos, Jennifer
    Carlile, Simon
    Carpenter, Mark G.
    Grimm, Giso
    Hohmann, Volker
    Holube, Inga
    Launer, Stefan
    Lunner, Thomas
    Mehra, Ravish
    Rapport, Frances
    Slaney, Malcolm
    Smeds, Karolina
    EAR AND HEARING, 2020, 41 : 5S - 19S
  • [28] THE WHY AND HOW OF COMMUNICATING SCIENCE
    KROGER, M
    FOOD TECHNOLOGY, 1987, 41 (01) : 93 - 99
  • [29] Science and Religion: The How and the Why
    Enck, Robert E.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2009, 26 (04): : 237 - 238
  • [30] Femtocell: What, Why, and How?
    Raza, Ali
    Bhutto, Zuhaibuddin
    Kumar, Ramesh
    Memon, Mudasar Latif
    Shaikh, Murtaza Hussain
    Shah, Jalal
    Idrees, Muhammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND NETWORK SECURITY, 2019, 19 (07): : 215 - 218