Reproducible science: what, why, how

被引:8
|
作者
Rodriguez-Sanchez, F. [1 ]
Perez-Luque, A. J. [2 ]
Bartomeus, I. [1 ]
Varela, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, EBD, Dept Ecol Integrat, Avda Americo Vespucio S-N, E-41092 Seville, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Inst Interuniv Sistema Tierra CEAMA, Lab Ecol iEcolab, Avda Mediterraneo S-N, Granada 18006, Spain
[3] Univ Alcala, Fac Biol Ciencias Ambientales & Quim, Dept Ciencias Vida, Ctra Madrid Barcelona,Km 33,600, Madrid 28805, Spain
来源
ECOSISTEMAS | 2016年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
data analysis; ecoinformatics; ecology; open science; programming; R; reproducibility;
D O I
10.7818/ECOS.2016.25-2.11
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Most scientific papers are not reproducible: it is really hard, if not impossible, to understand how results are derived from data, and being able to regenerate them in the future (even by the same researchers). However, traceability and reproducibility of results are indispensable elements of high-quality science, and an increasing requirement of many journals and funding sources. Reproducible studies include code able to regenerate results from the original data. This practice not only provides a perfect record of the whole analysis but also reduces the probability of errors and facilitates code reuse, thus accelerating scientific progress. But doing reproducible science also brings many benefits to the individual researcher, including saving time and effort, improved collaborations, and higher quality and impact of final publications. In this article we introduce reproducible science, why it is important, and how we can improve the reproducibility of our work. We introduce principles and tools for data management, analysis, version control, and software management that help us achieve reproducible workflows in the context of ecology.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 92
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Design Science: Why, What and How
    Papalambros, Panos Y.
    DESIGN SCIENCE, 2015, 1
  • [2] A History of Political Science: How? What? Why?
    Adcock, Robert
    Bevir, Mark
    Stimson, Shannon C.
    MODERN POLITICAL SCIENCE: ANGLO-AMERICAN EXCHANGES SINCE 1880, 2007, : 1 - +
  • [3] How, what, and why science faculty read
    Belefant-Miller, H.
    King, D.W.
    Science and Technology Libraries, 2001, 19 (02): : 91 - 107
  • [4] How, what, and why science faculty read
    Belefant-Miller, H
    King, DW
    SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LIBRARIES, 2001, 19 (02) : 91 - 112
  • [5] Teaching philosophy of science to scientists: why, what and how
    Grune-Yanoff, Till
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL FOR PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2014, 4 (01) : 115 - 134
  • [6] Training researchers in publication science: why, what, and how
    Butcher, Nancy J.
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Offringa, Martin
    Moher, David
    Galica, Jacqueline
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 117 : 165 - 167
  • [7] Teaching philosophy of science to scientists: why, what and how
    Till Grüne-Yanoff
    European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2014, 4 : 115 - 134
  • [8] The Southern Theory of Social Science: What, How and Why
    Yan, Liu
    Connell, Raewyn
    INTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES OF LITERATURE, 2019, 3 (01): : 1 - 22
  • [9] Commentary: Reproducible science, why protocols matter
    Selwood, David L.
    CHEMICAL BIOLOGY & DRUG DESIGN, 2019, 93 (06) : 975 - 978
  • [10] The why, what, and how of publishing a manuscript: A blend of art and science
    Cortina, Maria S.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 71 (08) : 2930 - 2931