Comparing Internet Addiction in Students with High and Low Socioeconomic Status Levels

被引:10
|
作者
Kayri, Murat [1 ]
Gunuc, Selim [2 ]
机构
[1] Batman Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Comp Engn, Bati Raman Kampusu, TR-72100 Batman, Turkey
[2] Yuzuncu Yil Univ, Dept Comp & Instruct Technol Educ, TR-65100 Van, Turkey
来源
ADDICTA-THE TURKISH JOURNAL ON ADDICTIONS | 2016年 / 3卷 / 02期
关键词
Internet addiction; Socioeconomic level; Cluster analysis; Adolescence;
D O I
10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0110
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Internet addiction varies according to the geographic, cultural, and socioeconomic conditions that an individual experiences. In adolescence, uncontrolled Internet use opens the way to cases of clinical-level addiction, and the likelihood of this addiction is thought to be closely related to individuals and family's socioeconomic levels. This research investigates adolescents whose families have a high socioeconomic level (266 students) and those whose families have a low socioeconomic level (187 students). This study applies the Internet addiction scale, which was developed by Gunuc and Kayri. The study is grouped according to similarities of addiction levels using cluster analysis. Internet addiction levels in the sample with high socioeconomic levels were calculated as M = 75.507; SD = 29.307. Afterwards, addiction levels were divided into three groups in accordance with two-step clustering analysis. While the first group located 74 students (27.8%) who were not addicted, M = 43.81, the second group was composed of 121 students (45.5%) who were at risk, M = 1.75, and the third group was composed of 71 students (26.7%) who were addicted, M = 114.94. The level of Internet addiction in the sample with a low socioeconomic level was obtained as M = 68.588, SD = 21.424. In accordance with findings of the two-step clustering analysis, this sampling was collected into three groups based on their similarities. The first group (n = 91; 48.7%) did not have addiction, (x) over bar = 51.14; individuals in the second group (n = 79; 42.2%) were observed to be at risk, M = 78.72, and the third group (n = 17; 9.1%) showed addiction, M = 114.88. While elevated dependency was calculated at a rate of 26.7% in students with a high socioeconomic level, the rate of elevated dependency was calculated as 9.1% for the group with a low socioeconomic level. Additionally, this study discusses the possible impact of different socioeconomic levels on Internet addiction.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 183
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Internet addiction disorder in a sample of students
    Taranto, F.
    Goracci, A.
    Bolognesi, S.
    Borghini, E.
    Fagiolini, A.
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 24 : S701 - S702
  • [32] Relationship between Internet Gaming Addiction and Body Mass Index Status among Indonesian Junior High School Students
    Subu, Muhammad Arsyad
    Al-Yateem, Nabeel
    Waluyo, Imam
    Dias, Jacqueline Maria
    Rahman, Syed Azizur
    Agustino, Rinto
    Ahamed, Iqbal Shaikh
    Al Marzooqi, Amina
    2021 IEEE 45TH ANNUAL COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (COMPSAC 2021), 2021, : 1391 - 1393
  • [33] Effects of a Group Counseling Integration Program on Self-determination and Internet Addiction in High School Students with Tendency to Internet Addiction
    Park, Gyeong Ran
    Kim, Hee Sook
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN ACADEMY OF NURSING, 2011, 41 (05) : 694 - 703
  • [34] Preventive Education for High School Students' Internet Addiction by Being Aware of the Actual Usage of the Internet
    Inagaki, Shunsuke
    Wada, Yuichi
    Horita, Tatsuya
    Proceedings - 2019 8th International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics, IIAI-AAI 2019, 2019, : 230 - 233
  • [35] An examination of the relationship between possible internet addiction and the levels of aggression and empathy among high school students in Isparta province
    Kocaman, Orhan
    Aktepe, Evrim
    Sonmez, Yonca
    ANADOLU PSIKIYATRI DERGISI-ANATOLIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 18 (06): : 602 - 610
  • [36] Scientific Argumentation for All? Comparing Teacher Beliefs About Argumentation in High, Mid, and Low Socioeconomic Status Schools
    Katsh-Singer, Rebecca
    McNeill, Katherine L.
    Loper, Suzanna
    SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2016, 100 (03) : 410 - 436
  • [37] Addiction to the mobile phone in gymnasium students at risk of Internet addiction
    Potembska, Emilia
    Pawlowska, Beata
    FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE REVIEW, 2010, 12 (03): : 803 - 805
  • [38] High Achievers from Low Family Socioeconomic Status Families: Protective Factors for Academically Resilient Students
    Yan, Yan
    Gai, Xiaosong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (23)
  • [39] Low- and high-socioeconomic status students preference for ingroup comparisons and their underpinning ability expectations
    Regner, Isabelle
    Monteil, Jean-Marc
    REVUE INTERNATIONALE DE PSYCHOLOGIE SOCIALE-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 20 (01): : 87 - 104
  • [40] Socioeconomic Status and Glaucoma: Associations in High Levels of Income and Education
    Oh, Shin Ah
    Ra, Ho
    Jee, Donghyun
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2019, 44 (04) : 436 - 441