DIRECT OBSERVATION ON THE FORMATION OF ANTIPHASE DOMAIN BOUNDARIES IN PIGEONITE

被引:0
|
作者
SHIMOBAYASHI, N
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The formation of the antiphase domain structure in pigeonite was observed in situ using a heating stage in a transmission electron microscope. The phase transition between high and low pigeonite occurred athermal-martensitically over a range of about 100-degrees-C. The observation showed that the APBs parallel to the c axis (L type) form at an earlier stage and the APBs transverse to the c axis (H type) form at the final stage of the C2/c to P2(1)/c pigeonite transition interval during cooling. The observation suggests that the H APBs are formed as the traces of C2/c pigeonite rather than as the original APBs. The formation of the H APBs is controlled by the movement of the interfaces between P2(1)/c) and C2/c pigeonite in the transition interval. C2/c pigeonite grew from the H APBs, where there is expected to be Ca enrichment. The Ca enrichment seems to facilitate the transition to C2/c pigeonite. Specifically, the Ca concentration locally lowers the transition temperature. Based on the difference between the two types of APBs with regard to the formation stage and the Ca enrichment, the fact that the H APBs are commonly observed in slowly cooled pigeonite, whereas the L APBs are commonly found in rapidly cooled pigeonite, can be explained qualitatively.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 114
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Formation Energies of Antiphase Boundaries in GaAs and GaP:An ab Initio Study
    Rubel, Oleg
    Baranovskii, Sergei D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2009, 10 (12): : 5104 - 5114
  • [42] Formation, faceting, and interaction behaviors of antiphase boundaries in GaAs thin films
    N.-H. Cho
    C. B. Carter
    Journal of Materials Science, 2001, 36 : 4209 - 4222
  • [43] Low-T ferroelectricity in antiphase domain boundaries of SrTiO3
    Arzel, L
    Hehlen, B
    Tagantsev, AK
    Dénoyer, F
    Liss, KD
    Currat, R
    Courtens, E
    FERROELECTRICS, 2002, 267 : 317 - 322
  • [44] Antiphase domain boundaries at the Fe3O4(001) surface
    Parkinson, Gareth S.
    Manz, Thomas A.
    Novotny, Zbynek
    Sprunger, Phillip T.
    Kurtz, Richard L.
    Schmid, Michael
    Sholl, David S.
    Diebold, Ulrike
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2012, 85 (19):
  • [45] THE ORIGIN OF AND CONTRAST FROM ANTIPHASE DOMAIN BOUNDARIES IN TIAL-BASED ALLOYS
    LI, YG
    ZHANG, XD
    LORETTO, MH
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 1995, 192 : 914 - 921
  • [46] ETCHING OF SLIP PRODUCED ANTIPHASE DOMAIN BOUNDARIES IN IRON-SILICON ALLOYS
    LIBOVICKY, S
    GEMPERLE, A
    CZECHOSLOVAK JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 1978, 28 (06) : 649 - 652
  • [47] GRAIN-BOUNDARIES AND ANTIPHASE BOUNDARIES IN GAAS
    CHO, NH
    MCKERNAN, S
    WAGNER, DK
    CARTER, CB
    JOURNAL DE PHYSIQUE, 1988, 49 (C-5): : 245 - 250
  • [48] ANTIPHASE DOMAIN BOUNDARIES IN GMO CRYSTALS - AN X-RAY TOPOGRAPHIC STUDY
    CAPELLE, B
    MALGRANGE, C
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION A, 1975, 31 : S258 - S259
  • [49] Direct atomic imaging of antiphase boundaries and orthotwins in orientation-patterned GaAs
    dos Reis, R.
    Ophus, C.
    Jimenez, J.
    Snure, M.
    Gerard, B.
    Liliental-Weber, Z.
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2013, 102 (08)
  • [50] ELECTRON-MICROSCOPE OBSERVATION OF DISLOCATIONS AND ANTIPHASE BOUNDARIES IN IRON-ALUMINUM ALLOYS
    SABURI, T
    YAMAUCHI, I
    NENNO, S
    JOURNAL OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 1972, 32 (03) : 694 - &