DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROTOXICITY - EVALUATION OF TESTING PROCEDURES WITH METHYLAZOXYMETHANOL AND METHYLMERCURY

被引:45
|
作者
GOLDEY, ES [1 ]
OCALLAGHAN, JP [1 ]
STANTON, ME [1 ]
BARONE, S [1 ]
CROFTON, KM [1 ]
机构
[1] MANTECH ENVIRONM TECHNOL INC, RES TRIANGLE PK, NC 27709 USA
来源
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY | 1994年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1006/faat.1994.1127
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
Testing procedures for identification of potential developmental neurotoxicants were evaluated using two prototypical developmental neurotoxicants, methylazoxymethanol (MAM) and methylmercury (MeHg). Evaluation of offspring of Long-Evans rats incorporated assessments of developmental toxicity, neurochemistry, histology, and behavior, with most testing being completed near weaning. A number of endpoints in the testing strategy were sensitive to the effects of prenatal exposure to MAM [30 mg/kg on Gestation Day (GD) 15]: (1) MAM caused reduced neonatal body weights but did not effect viability or postnatal survivorship; (2) measurement of total and regional brain weight and histological analysis showed that a number of regions, the cortex and hippocampus in particular, were affected by MAM exposure; (3) an assay for glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) showed that the concentration of this protein was significantly increased in the cortex and hippocampus of treated offspring; (4) a T-maze delayed-alternation procedure indicated that MAM-treated pups were slower in the acquisition phase of the task relative to control pups; (5) motor activity testing revealed hyperactivity in treated offspring that persisted into adulthood; and (6) acoustic startle procedures revealed reduced startle amplitudes in preweanlings. Few endpoints were significantly affected by prenatal MeHg exposure (1, 2, or 4 mg/kg on GD 6-15). High fetal and neonatal mortality and lower neonatal body weights were detected at the highest dose of MeHg. Although minimal effects of MeHg may reflect a relative insensitivity of the test species and/or the test methods, the combined results from both chemicals suggest that some procedures not currently required in the developmental neurotoxicity guideline may be useful in hazard identification, and further evaluation with other chemicals, species, strains, and/or exposure paradigms may be warranted. (C) 1994 society of Toxicology.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 464
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Zebrafish as a systems toxicology model for developmental neurotoxicity testing
    Nishimura, Yuhei
    Murakami, Soichiro
    Ashikawa, Yoshifumi
    Sasagawa, Shota
    Umemoto, Noriko
    Shimada, Yasuhito
    Tanaka, Toshio
    CONGENITAL ANOMALIES, 2015, 55 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [42] Testing for developmental neurotoxicity: Perspective from an industry laboratory
    Sheets, LP
    NEUROTOXICOLOGY, 2003, 24 (02) : 296 - 296
  • [43] An improved approach to regulatory developmental neurotoxicity testing (DNT)
    Vorhees, Charles
    Williams, Michael
    NEUROTOXICOLOGY AND TERATOLOGY, 2018, 67 : 77 - 77
  • [44] Human neurospheres as a potential tool for developmental neurotoxicity testing
    Fritsche, Ellen
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 189 : S54 - S54
  • [45] Establishment of in vitro assays for regulatory developmental neurotoxicity testing
    Bartmann, K.
    Masjosthusmann, S.
    Stuerzl, L. -C.
    Waldmann, T.
    Leist, M.
    Fritsche, E.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 314 : S221 - S221
  • [46] Developmental neurotoxicity testing: Locomotor activity in zebrafish an alternative?
    Waalkens-Berendsen, I.
    De Esch, C.
    Van Der Linde, H.
    De Groot, D.
    Willemsen, R.
    Wolterbeek, A.
    TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2010, 196 : S219 - S219
  • [50] Neurophysiological evidence of methylmercury neurotoxicity
    Murata, Katsuyuki
    Grandjean, Philippe
    Dakeishi, Miwako
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2007, 50 (10) : 765 - 771