Social influence or risk perception? A mathematical model of self-protection infection in network

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, He [1 ]
Xu, Yang [1 ]
Xing, Jingli [2 ]
Shi, Tianyu [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci Beijing, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Chinese Med, Ctr Evidence Based Chinese Med, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Sci Tech Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Social influence; Risk perception; Self-protection; Asymptomatic infection; Epidemic threshold;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Social influence and risk perception are important to drive the adoption of self-protective behaviors among people during an epidemic outbreak. It is interesting to know whether people should have more belief in social influence or in risk perception when they are faced with an asymptomatic infection. To explore the problem, we develop an extended epidemic model and apply it in a multilayer network topology. It is found that both social influence and risk perception can increase the density of self-protection and reduce the density of infections, but their impacts on the epidemic threshold are different. Specifically, risk perception is unable to affect the epidemic threshold, while social influence can increase the epidemic threshold only if its strength is larger than its own threshold. However, when the epidemic infectivity is very high and the epidemic is ineradicable by self-protection, increasing belief in social influence may instead lead to more infections. The contrary results not only reveal the different mechanisms of social influence and risk perception in hindering an epidemic, but also provide practical implications on the belief distribution between them.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The security event correlation engine of network self-protection system
    Yang, Hongyu
    Wang, Dongming
    Chen, Chuangxi
    ICIC Express Letters, 2011, 5 (9 A): : 3087 - 3093
  • [32] Online monitoring and analysis for self-protection against network attacks
    Qu, GZ
    Hariri, S
    Jangiti, S
    Rudraraju, J
    Oh, S
    Fayssal, S
    Zhang, GS
    Parashar, M
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AUTONOMIC COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 324 - 325
  • [33] Connect or Protect? Social Class and Self-Protection in Romantic Relationships
    Emery, Lydia F.
    Finkel, Eli J.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 122 (04) : 683 - 699
  • [34] The social determinants of gun ownership: Self-protection in an urban environment
    Cao, LQ
    Cullen, FT
    Link, BG
    CRIMINOLOGY, 1997, 35 (04) : 629 - 657
  • [35] Perceived problems for self and others: Self-protection by social downgrading throughout adulthood
    Heckhausen, J
    Brim, OG
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 1997, 12 (04) : 610 - 619
  • [36] Does Inefficient Risk Sharing Increase Public Self-Protection?
    Ferranna, Maddalena
    GENEVA RISK AND INSURANCE REVIEW, 2017, 42 (01): : 59 - 85
  • [37] Analysis of the Risk of Fire and Self-Protection Measures of "CICCOPN" Establishment
    Primo, Vitor
    Oliveira, Paulo
    Pinto, Silverio
    SHO2015: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HYGIENE, 2015, : 282 - 284
  • [38] Does Inefficient Risk Sharing Increase Public Self-Protection?
    Maddalena Ferranna
    The Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 2017, 42 : 59 - 85
  • [39] THE IMPACT OF SELF-PROTECTION AND SELF-INSURANCE ON INDIVIDUAL-RESPONSE TO RISK
    SHOGREN, JF
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1990, 3 (02) : 191 - 204
  • [40] Self-Insurance, Self-Protection, and Saving: On Consumption Smoothing and Risk Management
    Hofmann, Annette
    Peter, Richard
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND INSURANCE, 2016, 83 (03) : 719 - 734