The Expression of the Location Event-Structure Metaphor in American Sign Language

被引:3
|
作者
Roush, Daniel R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Kentucky Univ, Dept Amer Sign Language & Interpreter Educ, Richmond, KY 40475 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1353/sls.2016.0008
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Conceptual metaphor theory (CMT) proposes that there is a large system of conceptual metaphors in our cognition known as event-structure metaphors (ESMs). Through ESMs, we understand the conceptual domains of actions, causes, changes, states, purposes, and so forth in terms of the aspects of the domain of motion in space. ESMs are largely organized under two systems, or branches-the location and object branches. Earlier studies present linguistic evidence that these ESM conceptual systems are expressed in unrelated spoken languages (English, Hungarian, Chinese, and Arabic) thus supporting the claim that ESMs are universal. In this article, I explore the question of whether the location branch of event-structure metaphors (location ESM) is exhibited in American Sign Language (ASL). The article begins with a brief review of the conceptual metaphor theory and its application to signed languages. This is followed by a summary of the location ESM and references to studies that support its cross-linguistic universality. A description of data and methods used in this investigation is given. I then define each of the eleven submappings of the location ESM system. For each respective submapping, I reference English examples from the CMT literature. I then analyze evidence selected from ASL corpora suggesting that each of the submappings in the location ESM system is exhibited in ASL. This study is the first systematic investigation in a signed language that supports the claim of universality of each main submapping in the location ESM system.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 432
页数:44
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Discriminant Features and Temporal Structure of Nonmanuals in American Sign Language
    Benitez-Quiroz, C. Fabian
    Goekgoez, Kadir
    Wilbur, Ronnie B.
    Martinez, Aleix M.
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (02):
  • [22] The syntax of American sign language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure
    Emmorey, K
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (09) : 363 - 364
  • [23] Historical Sociology, Narrative and Event-Structure Analysis: Fifteen Years Later
    Griffin, Larry J.
    SOCIOLOGICA-ITALIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY ON LINE, 2007, (03):
  • [24] Event representations constrain the structure of language: Sign language as a window into universally accessible linguistic biases
    Strickland, Brent
    Geraci, Carlo
    Chemla, Emmanuel
    Schlenker, Philippe
    Kelepir, Meltem
    Pfau, Roland
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2015, 112 (19) : 5968 - 5973
  • [25] THE AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE DICTIONARY
    STERNBERG, MLA
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 1995, 21 (05): : 422 - 423
  • [26] American sign language.
    Wickens, A
    LIBRARY JOURNAL, 1999, 124 (02) : 80 - 80
  • [27] Spatial and Temporal Pyramids for Grammatical Expression Recognition of American Sign Language
    Michael, Nicholas
    Metaxas, Dimitris
    Neidle, Carol
    ASSETS'09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGACCESS CONFERENCE ON COMPUTERS AND ACCESSIBILITY, 2009, : 75 - 82
  • [28] American Sign Language Interpreter
    Kadam, Kunal
    Ganu, Rucha
    Bhosekar, Ankita
    Joshi, S. D.
    2012 IEEE FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY FOR EDUCATION (T4E), 2012, : 157 - 159
  • [29] CLITICS IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE
    KEGL, JA
    SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS, 1986, 19 : 285 - 309
  • [30] Historical sociology, narrative and event-structure analysis. 15 years later
    Griffin, L.
    SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2010, (02): : 131 - 140