Signaling coherence relations by means of discourse markers makes identification of the relations easier? An investigation of the recognition of the relations by discourse addressees

被引:0
|
作者
Antonio, Juliano Desiderato [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Maringa, Programa Posgrad Letras, Dept Teorias Linguist & Literarias, Ave Colombo 5790,Jd Univ, BR-87020900 Maringa, Parana, Brazil
关键词
Functionalism; Rhetorical Structure Theory; coherence relations;
D O I
10.17851/2237-2083.24.1.293-325
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
This paper aims to investigate if the lack of discourse markers to signal coherence relations makes the identification of the relations in undergraduate lectures more difficult or even impossible. The research was performed by presenting ten excerpts of undergraduate lectures for professors. Initially, the excerpts were presented to the informants without the connectors that combine the investigated text spans. Further, the excerpts were presented with the connectors. It was found that, in most instances, the identification of the relations by responders was possible even without the connector, supporting RST's assumption that coherence relations may be held and interpreted even without connectives. Although the informants were able to identify the relations correctly, they considered that signaling the relations by means of connectors facilitates identification.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 325
页数:33
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [31] Tree Framework With BERT Word Embedding for the Recognition of Chinese Implicit Discourse Relations
    Jiang, Dan
    He, Jin
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 (08): : 162004 - 162011
  • [32] Recursive autoencoder based automatic features learning for implicit discourse relations recognition
    Wu, Changxing
    Shi, Xiaodong
    Huang, Yanzhou
    Journal of Computational Information Systems, 2015, 11 (12): : 4263 - 4271
  • [33] How Robust Is Discourse Processing for Native Readers? The Role of Connectives and the Coherence Relations They Convey
    Wetzel, Mathis
    Zufferey, Sandrine
    Gygax, Pascal
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [34] Individual differences in expecting coherence relations: Exploring the variability in sensitivity to contextual signals in discourse
    Scholman, Merel C. J.
    Demberg, Vera
    Sanders, Ted J. M.
    DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2020, 57 (10) : 844 - 861
  • [35] The Role of Government in Managing Intercultural Relations Multicultural Discourse and the Politics of Culture Recognition in Macedonia
    Stanisevski, Dragan M.
    Miller, Hugh T.
    ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 2009, 41 (05) : 551 - 575
  • [36] Automatic identification of rhetorical relations among intra-sentence discourse segments in Arabic
    Lagrini S.
    Azizi N.
    Redjimi M.
    Dwairi M.A.
    International Journal of Intelligent Systems Technologies and Applications, 2019, 18 (03): : 281 - 302
  • [37] Weak and Strong Discourse Markers in Speech, Chat, and Writing: Do Signals Compensate for Ambiguity in Explicit Relations?
    Crible, Ludivine
    DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2020, 57 (09) : 793 - 807
  • [38] Inter-sentential anaphora and coherence relations in discourse: A perfect match (vol 31, pg 572, 2009)
    Cornish, Francis
    LANGUAGE SCIENCES, 2010, 32 (03) : 425 - 425