SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN, CLINICAL STAGE, PATHOLOGICAL GRADE, AND THE INCIDENCE OF NODAL METASTASES IN PROSTATE-CANCER

被引:0
|
作者
SANDS, ME [1 ]
ZAGARS, GK [1 ]
POLLACK, A [1 ]
VONESCHENBACH, AC [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS, MD ANDERSON CANC CTR, DEPT CLIN RADIOTHERAPY & UROL, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the potential gains in using serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels for predicting the incidence of pelvic nodal metastases in patients with otherwise localized prostate cancer. Methods. We reviewed 569 patients undergoing staging lymphadenectomy, and evaluated the correlation between clinical stage, tumor grade, presurgical PSA level, and the incidence of nodal metastatic disease using univariate and multivariate regression. Results. In univariate analysis stage, grade, and PSA level were highly significant covariates with nodal metastasis. Nodal metastatic rates increased as stage increased: Stage T1 (A2), 6 of 127 (5%); Stage T2 (B), 41 of 243 (17%); Stage T3 (C), 95 of 199 (48%), (p < 0.0001). Likewise metastatic rates increased as grade increased: Gleason grades 2 to 4, 6 of 124 (5%); Gleason grades 5 and 6, 52 of 238 (22%); Gleason grade 7, 41 of 122 (34%); Gleason grades 8 to 10, 43 of 84 (51%) (p < 0.0001). The relationship between PSA level and nodal metastases was not linear and we selected the following groupings that correlated with nodal disease: 4 or less ng/mL, 4 of 104 (4%); more than 4 to 20 or less ng/mL, 73 of 335 (22%); more than 20 to 40 or less ng/mL, 35 of 85 (41%); more than 40 ng/mL, 30 of 45 (67%) (p < 0.0001). Using multivariate logistic regression, stage, grade, and PSA were independently predictive of nodal status. Conclusions. The gains in predictive accuracy from PSA beyond that obtained from stage and grade were small and in practice would benefit fewer than 15% of our patients. Staging pelvic lymphadenectomy remains the only satisfactory method for elucidating nodal status in the majority of patients with prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 220
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] IS PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY MORE USEFUL THAN PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE-CANCER
    OHORI, M
    DUNN, JK
    SCARDINO, PT
    UROLOGY, 1995, 46 (05) : 666 - 671
  • [42] PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY AND AGE-SPECIFIC PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN VALUES - THE SOLUTION OF PROSTATE-CANCER SCREENING
    PAUL, R
    BREUL, J
    HARTUNG, R
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1995, 27 (04) : 286 - 291
  • [43] USE OF HUMAN PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN MONITORING PROSTATE-CANCER
    KURIYAMA, M
    WANG, MC
    LEE, CL
    PAPSIDERO, LD
    KILLIAN, CS
    INAJI, H
    SLACK, NH
    NISHIURA, T
    MURPHY, GP
    CHU, TM
    CANCER RESEARCH, 1981, 41 (10) : 3874 - 3876
  • [45] ROLE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AS A PREDICTOR OF OUTCOME IN PROSTATE-CANCER
    BLACKLEDGE, GRP
    LOWERY, K
    PROSTATE, 1994, : 34 - 38
  • [46] AN ALGORITHM FOR PROSTATE-CANCER DETECTION IN A PATIENT POPULATION USING PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY
    BENSON, MC
    MCMAHON, DJ
    COONER, WH
    OLSSON, CA
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 11 (04) : 206 - 213
  • [47] PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN FOLLOWING RADIOTHERAPY FOR LOCAL PROSTATE-CANCER
    ROSENZWEIG, KE
    MORGAN, WR
    LYTTON, B
    PESCHEL, RE
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (05): : 1561 - 1564
  • [48] Preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage and Gleason sum as basis for predicting final pathological stage Japanese patients with prostate cancer
    Egawa, S
    Koh, H
    Satoh, T
    Ohori, M
    Uchida, T
    Kuwao, S
    Koshiba, K
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 26 (06) : 438 - 444
  • [49] INFLUENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER TUMOUR STAGE AND GRADE ON SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN IN PATIENTS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Smiltens, I
    Romula, I
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY SUPPLEMENTS, 2010, 9 (06) : 535 - 535
  • [50] Prostate cancer in the serum prostate-specific antigen era
    Humphrey, PA
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 73 (05) : 489 - 490