COMPARISON OF BICARBONATE AND HEPES-BUFFERED MEDIA ON PREGNANCY RATES AFTER INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION WITH CRYOPRESERVED DONOR SPERM

被引:0
|
作者
BYRD, W
ACKERMAN, GE
BRADSHAW, KD
MADDOX, MA
SVENDSEN, BA
CARR, BR
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: We compared the pregnancy rates (PRs) after intrauterine insemination (IUI) with frozen donor sperm prepared in Ham's F-10 medium (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA) with bicarbonate buffer and synthetic human tubal fluid with HEPES buffer (Irvine Scientific). Design: Women (n = 101) were randomized upon entry into the program, receiving sperm prepared in either Ham's F-10 or human tubal fluid medium their first treatment cycle. If pregnancy did not occur, the alternate medium was used to prepared sperm for the following cycle. Setting: All patients were treated in our private care center. Patients: Patients entering this study were normally ovulating women undergoing IUI with frozen donor sperm. Main Outcome Measure: Pregnancy was used as our main outcome measure of success. Results: After 324 cycles of treatment, the PR per cycle of IUI was 17.5% with sperm prepared in human tubal fluid which was significantly different (P = 0.05) from the PR (9.8%) after insemination with sperm prepared in Ham's F-10. There was no statistical difference in the number of motile cells inseminated in each of these groups. Conclusions: Transitory exposure of the sperm in Ham's F-10 medium to the environment during preparation for insemination may result in an alkalinization of the medium that has a lasting influence on sperm fertility.
引用
收藏
页码:540 / 546
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PREGNANCY RATES IN ESTONIAN HOLSTEIN HEIFERS AFTER INSEMINATION WITH SEXED SPERM
    Kurykin, J.
    Jalakas, M.
    Majas, L.
    Kaart, T.
    Jaakma, Ue
    REPRODUCTION FERTILITY AND DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 23 (01) : 112 - 112
  • [42] Effect of time intervals from the end of sperm collection to intrauterine insemination on the pregnancy rates in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation-intrauterine insemination cycles
    Pekcan, Meryem Kuru
    Kokanali, Demet
    Kokanali, Kuntay
    Tasci, Yasemin
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY OBSTETRICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2018, 47 (10) : 561 - 564
  • [43] Relationships between the sperm and the hyaluronan binding assay (HBA™) and intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates.
    Roudebush, WE
    Davis, AL
    Mitchell-Leef, D
    Elsner, CW
    Massey, JB
    Kort, HI
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 84 : S288 - S289
  • [44] SINGLE AND DOUBLE DONOR SPERM INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION CYCLES FOR MALE FACTOR INFERTILITY: DOES DOUBLE IUI INCREASE CLINICAL PREGNANCY RATES?
    Hill, M. J.
    Richter, K. S.
    Zarek, S. M.
    DeCherney, A. H.
    Osheroff, J. E.
    Levens, E. D.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 100 (03) : S71 - S71
  • [45] The interval between insemination and ovulation predicts outcome after intrauterine insemination with donor sperm (IUI-D)
    Mu, Xin
    Wang, Hui
    Liu, Pei-Jun
    Shi, Juan-Zi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2022, 156 (02) : 341 - 348
  • [46] Adequate dosage of cryopreserved donor sperm for intrauterine insemination: Variation in recovery from commercial samples and associated fecundity.
    Kuehl, TJ
    Neugart, E
    Wincek, TJ
    Pliego, JF
    LeFever, R
    Brown, ML
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2001, 76 (03) : S271 - S271
  • [47] A comparison of pregnancy rate before and after the administration of HCG in intrauterine insemination
    Dehghani-Firouzabai, Razieh
    Aflatoonian, Abbas
    Davar, Robab
    Farid-Mojtahedi, Maryam
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2014, 289 (02) : 429 - 432
  • [49] Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) Pregnancy Rates After COVID-19 Vaccination
    Groves, Savannah
    Hsu, Albert
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 141 : 2S - 2S
  • [50] A comparison of pregnancy rate before and after the administration of HCG in intrauterine insemination
    Razieh Dehghani-Firouzabai
    Abbas Aflatoonian
    Robab Davar
    Maryam Farid-Mojtahedi
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2014, 289 : 429 - 432