OBSTETRICAL PRACTICE AMONG NEW RURAL FAMILY PHYSICIANS

被引:0
|
作者
PATHMAN, D
TROPMAN, S
机构
[1] UNIV N CAROLINA,DEPT HLTH POLICY & ADM,CHAPEL HILL,NC 27599
[2] UNIV N CAROLINA,CECIL G SHEPS CTR HLTH SERV RES,CHAPEL HILL,NC 27599
来源
JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE | 1995年 / 40卷 / 05期
关键词
FAMILY PRACTICE; OBSTETRICS; PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS; RURAL PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS; PHYSICIANS PRACTICE PATTERNS; RURAL HEALTH; PHYSICIANS; FAMILY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Fewer family physicians now practice maternity care than a decade ago, a trend that is worsening access to obstetrical care in some rural areas. This study explores the effects of a wide range of factors on the likelihood of newly settled rural family physicians providing maternity care. Methods. Subjects included 782 family physicians who moved to nonmetropolitan areas nationwide during the years 1987 through 1990. Physicians who located in health professional shortage areas were oversampled. Questionnaires were mailed in 1991, with a 72% response rate. The final sample used in the analyses included 338 eligible respondents. Results. A total of 151 (45%) of these rural family physicians performed routine deliveries during the previous year. Family physicians more likely to provide maternity care worked in practices they owned and were not solo practitioners (P less than or equal to.05). Maternity care by family physicians also was more common in counties that were less populated, had fewer obstetricians, and had more family physicians. State-by-state differences in the cost of medical malpractice insurance and Medicaid reimbursement rates for obstetrical care were not among the factors associated with the provision of maternity care for these rural family physicians. Conclusions. These data suggest that features of rural family physicians' practices and communities are the best predictors of whether they provide maternity care. Contrary to what family physicians often claim, we found that malpractice premium costs and Medicaid reimbursement rates were not associated with family physicians' likelihood of providing maternity care.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 464
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Family physicians' satisfaction with practice
    Hueston, WJ
    ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 1998, 7 (03) : 242 - 247
  • [32] Office-based procedures among urban and rural family physicians in Ontario
    Jaakkimainen, R. Liisa
    Sood, Priya R.
    Schultz, Susan E.
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2012, 58 (10) : E578 - E587
  • [33] Practice patterns of rural family physicians based on the American Diabetes Association standards of care
    Zoorob, RJ
    Mainous, AG
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1996, 21 (03) : 175 - 182
  • [34] Rural Family Physicians Are Twice as Likely to Use Telehealth as Urban Family Physicians
    Jetty, Anuradha
    Moore, Miranda A.
    Coffman, Megan
    Petterson, Stephen
    Bazemore, Andrew
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2018, 24 (04) : 268 - 276
  • [35] An assessment of practice support and continuing medical education needs of rural Pennsylvania family physicians
    Forti, EM
    Martin, KE
    Jones, RL
    Herman, JM
    JOURNAL OF RURAL HEALTH, 1996, 12 (05): : 432 - 437
  • [36] Secondary stroke prevention best practice recommendations: exploring barriers for rural family physicians
    Warner, Grace
    Harrold, Jessie
    Allen, Michael
    Lyons, Renee
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF RURAL MEDICINE, 2010, 15 (04) : 143 - 152
  • [37] Anesthesia skills for rural family physicians
    Gelhorn, D
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2002, 48 : 324 - 324
  • [38] The place of home visiting in family practice: a multicentre comparison between rural and urban physicians
    Nakar, S
    Vinker, S
    Weingarten, MA
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 1999, 49 (445): : 621 - 625
  • [39] Rural women family physicians - Are they unique?
    Incitti, F
    Rourke, J
    Rourke, LL
    Kennard, MA
    CANADIAN FAMILY PHYSICIAN, 2003, 49 : 320 - 327
  • [40] A fast track for rural family physicians
    Norris, TE
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2003, 16 (02): : 182 - 183