ORAL ARGUMENT BEFORE SUPREME COURT - MARSHALL VERSES DAVIS IN SCHOOL SEGREGATION CASES

被引：6

作者：

DICKENS, M ^{[1
]}

SCHWARTZ, RE ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV SO CALIF,GRAD PROGRAM COMMUN,LOS ANGELES,CA 90007

来源：

QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF SPEECH | 1971年 / 57卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/00335637109383039

中图分类号：

G2 [信息与知识传播];

学科分类号：

05 ; 0503 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：32 / 42

页数：11

共 45 条

[31] The constitutionality of physician-assisted suicide: The cases and issues before the US Supreme Court
Meehan, MJ
CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 64 (01) : 13 - 15
[32] Oral arguments before the United States Supreme Court in Stenberg v. Carhart
不详
ISSUES IN LAW & MEDICINE, 2000, 16 (01) : 69 - 90
[33] After Myriad Oral Argument, Supreme Court Set to Decide Patentability of Isolated Human DNA Molecules
Hearron, Marc A.
Mullen, James J., III
Kreeger, Matthew I.
BIOTECHNOLOGY LAW REPORT, 2013, 32 (03) : 140 - 142
[34] AN ANALYSIS OF THE NATURE AND FREQUENCY OF SUPREME COURT CASES IN SCHOOL LAW FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR OF 1927
Thiel, Richard B.
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1929, 19 (03): : 177 - 182
[35] SCHOOL-DESEGREGATION IN THE SUPREME-COURT - THE DEVELOPMENT OF A JURISPRUDENCE OF REMEDIES FOR COMPLEX CONSTITUTIONAL CASES
TYLER, RS
EMORY LAW JOURNAL, 1979, 28 (04) : 985 - 1032
[36] Rights-Based Climate Litigation in Brazil: An Assessment of Constitutional Cases Before the Brazilian Supreme Court
Moreira, Danielle de Andrade
Nina, Ana Lucia B.
Garrido, Carolina de Figueiredo
Neves, Maria Eduarda Segovia Barbosa
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICE, 2024, 16 (01) : 47 - 70
[37] SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CASES STRENGTHEN ARGUMENT FOR MUNICIPAL OBLIGATION TO DISCHARGE DUTY TO CONSULT: TIME TO PUT NESKONLITH TO REST
Decembrini, Angela D'Elia
Imai, Shin
ALBERTA LAW REVIEW, 2019, 56 (03) : 935 - 949
[38] Listening to competing speakers: evolving interest group sponsorship of commercial speech cases before the American Supreme Court
Espino, Giuliano
INTEREST GROUPS & ADVOCACY, 2022, 11 (04) : 545 - 568
[39] Listening to competing speakers: evolving interest group sponsorship of commercial speech cases before the American Supreme Court
Giuliano Espino
Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2022, 11 : 545 - 568
[40] MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT - THE MOST SIGNIFICANT ORAL ARGUMENTS MADE BEFORE THE SUPREME-COURT SINCE 1955 - IRONS,P, GUITTON,S
UROFSKY, MI
NEW YORK TIMES BOOK REVIEW, 1993, : 33 - 33

← 1 2 3 4 5 →