Reliability of oral examinations: Radiation oncology certifying examination

Purpose: Oral examinations are used in certifying examinations by many medical specialty boards. They represent daily clinical practice situations more realistically than do written tests or computer-based tests. However, there are repeated concerns in the literature regarding objectivity, fairness, and extraneous factors from interpersonal interactions, item bias, reliability, and validity. In this study, the reliability of oral examination on the radiation oncology certifying examination, which was administered in May of 2010, was analyzed. Methods and Materials: One hundred fifty-two candidates rotated though 8 examination stations. Stations consisted of a hotel room equipped with a computer and software that exhibited images appropriate to the content areas. Each candidate had a 25-30 minute face-to-face encounter with an oral examiner who was a content expert in one of the following areas: gastrointestinal, gynecology, genitourinary, lymphoma/leukemia/transplant/myeloma, head/neck/skin, breast, central nervous system/pediatrics, or lung/sarcoma. This type of design is typically referred to as a repeated measures design or a subject by treatment design, although the oral examination was a routine event without any experimental manipulation. Results: The reliability coefficient was obtained by applying Feldt and Charter's simple computational alternative to analysis of variance formulas that yielded KR-20, or Cronbach's coefficient alpha of 0.81. Conclusions: An experimental design to develop a blueprint in order to improve the consistency of evaluation is suggested. (C) 2013 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.