HIGH-DOSE VERSUS LOW-DOSE BOVINE SURFACTANT TREATMENT IN VERY PREMATURE-INFANTS

被引:25
|
作者
GORTNER, L
POHLANDT, F
BARTMANN, P
BERNSAU, U
PORZ, F
HELLWEGE, H
SEITZ, RC
HIERONIMI, G
KUHLS, E
JORCH, G
REITER, HL
BAUER, J
VERSMOLD, H
MEILER, B
机构
[1] UNIV ULM,CHILDRENS HOSP,ULM,GERMANY
[2] PEDIAT HOSP,AUGSBURG,GERMANY
[3] UNIV HAMBURG,CHILDRENS HOSP,HAMBURG,GERMANY
[4] OLGA HOSP,CTR PEDIAT,STUTTGART,GERMANY
[5] UNIV MUNSTER,CHILDRENS HOSP,MUNSTER,GERMANY
[6] UNIV GIESSEN,CHILDRENS HOSP,GIESSEN,GERMANY
[7] UNIV MUNICH,MUNICH,GERMANY
关键词
BOVINE SURFACTANT; OXYGENATION; PULMONARY INTERSTITIAL EMPHYSEMA; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; VERY PREMATURE INFANTS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1651-2227.1994.tb13036.x
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
The aim of the study was to determine if high-dose bovine surfactant (Alveofact, initially 100 mg/kg birth weight) would improve oxygenation compared with low-dose surfactant (50 mg/kg birth weight) administered intratracheally within 1 h after birth. Inclusion criteria included gestational age 24-29 weeks and birth weight 500-1500 g, intubation and mechanical ventilation, absence of congenital malformations and bacterial infections. Retreatment was considered if the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO(2)) was > 0.4 (dose 50 mg/kg birth weight). The primary endpoint was level of oxygenation (PaO2/FiO(2)) 2 h after treatment. The study design was a sequential analysis using a triangular test with alpha = 0.05 and 95% power to detect a 25% improvement in the endpoint. Oxygenation was improved significantly with high-dose (n = 42) compared to low-dose treatment (n = 48): 30.9 +/- 15.0 kPa (231.5 +/- 112.7 mmHg) versus 24.1 +/- 15.7 kPa (180.6 +/- 118.0 mmHg) (mean +/- SD). The survival rate was 83% in both groups and the incidence of pulmonary interstitial emphysema was 33% versus 14% with the high-dose treatment. We conclude that high-dose surfactant significantly improved oxygenation and reduced lung barotrauma. An initial dose greater than 50 mg/kg birth weight of surfactant is required for optimal acute response.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 141
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] High-dose versus low-dose valproic acid as a prophylactic medication
    Taylor, K
    Goldstein, J
    HEADACHE, 1996, 36 (08): : 514 - 515
  • [22] LOW-DOSE VERSUS HIGH-DOSE CORTICOSTEROIDS IN RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION
    THOMSON, NM
    ATKINS, RC
    HOLDSWORTH, SR
    SCOTT, DF
    MARSHALL, VC
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1982, 12 (04): : 332 - 333
  • [23] LOW-DOSE VERSUS HIGH-DOSE INSULIN THERAPY FOR DIABETIC KETOACIDOSIS
    PFEIFER, MA
    SAMOLS, E
    WOLTER, CF
    WINKLER, CF
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1979, 72 (02) : 149 - 154
  • [24] High-dose versus low-dose antivenom in the treatment of poisonous snake bites: A systematic review
    Das, Rashmi Ranjan
    Sankar, Jhuma
    Dev, Nishanth
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2015, 19 (06) : 340 - 349
  • [25] High-Dose versus Low-Dose Naloxone for Treatment of Presumed Opioid Intoxication in Pediatric Patients
    Hines, Elizabeth Q.
    Nelson, Lewis S.
    Repplinger, Daniel J.
    Stevens, Martha W.
    Anders, Jennifer F.
    CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2015, 53 (07) : 765 - 766
  • [26] High-dose versus low-dose octreotide in the treatment of acute pancreatitis: A randomized controlled trial
    Wang, Rui
    Yang, Fan
    Wu, Hao
    Wang, Yufang
    Huang, Zhiyin
    Hu, Bing
    Zhang, Mingguang
    Tang, Chengwei
    PEPTIDES, 2013, 40 : 57 - 64
  • [27] HIGH-DOSE TO LOW-DOSE EXTRAPOLATION IN ANIMALS
    BROWN, CC
    ACS SYMPOSIUM SERIES, 1984, 239 : 57 - 79
  • [28] Antihypertensive monopharmacotherapy with very-low-dose, low-dose, and high-dose formulations of diuretics: Efficacy and safety
    Reyes, AJ
    CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2000, : 229 - 234
  • [29] HIGH-DOSE TO LOW-DOSE EXTRAPOLATION IN ANIMALS
    BROWN, CC
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1982, 184 (SEP): : 53 - CHAS
  • [30] SALICYLATE TREATMENT IN KAWASAKI-DISEASE - HIGH-DOSE OR LOW-DOSE
    AKAGI, T
    KATO, H
    INOUE, O
    SATO, N
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1991, 150 (09) : 642 - 646