DRY DEPOSITION OF ATMOSPHERIC PARTICLES - APPLICATION OF CURRENT MODELS TO AMBIENT DATA

被引:115
|
作者
HOLSEN, TM
NOLL, KE
机构
[1] Prltzker Department of Environmental Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, Illinois
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es00033a015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The dry deposition mass flux for atmospheric particles was calculated as a function of particle size (mass-flux size distribution). The mass-flux size distribution increased rapidly with particle size with the majority of the calculated flux due to particles larger than 1-mu-m (>90%). The evaluation of dry deposition was based on (1) atmospheric mass-size distributions between 0.01 and 100-mu-m diameter obtained from field measurements with a cascade impactor and a Noll rotary impactor (NRI) and data in the literature obtained with a wide-range aerosol classifier (WRAC) system, (2) field dry deposition sampling data using a surrogate surface, and (3) dry deposition calculations based on various models that estimate dry deposition velocity as a function of particle size. Results of model calculations using the atmospheric particle size distribution data were compared to measured flux data to show that realistic estimates can be made for the total dry deposition flux. Calculations using models that account for particle size distribution show that results are extremely sensitive to the mass of large particles and that large particles control dry deposition flux due to their high deposition velocities. Current dry deposition modeling techniques that use average particle concentrations and average deposition velocities underestimate the contribution of coarse particles to dry deposition and therefore underestimate dry deposition.
引用
收藏
页码:1807 / 1815
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] MECHANISMS OF DRY DEPOSITION OF AIRBORNE PARTICLES
    WU, YL
    DAVIDSON, CI
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1991, 201 : 65 - NUCL
  • [32] An application of passive samplers to understand atmospheric mercury concentration and dry deposition spatial distributions
    Huang, Jiaoyan
    Choi, Hyun-Deok
    Landis, Matthew S.
    Holsen, Thomas M.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2012, 14 (11): : 2976 - 2982
  • [33] Precision of atmospheric dry deposition data from the Clean Air Status and Trends Network
    Sickles, JE
    Shadwick, DS
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 36 (36-37) : 5671 - 5686
  • [34] Atmospheric dry deposition on leaves at an urban location
    Salve, P. R.
    Maurya, A.
    Wate, S. R.
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2006, 77 (06) : 834 - 837
  • [35] Atmospheric Dry Deposition on Leaves at an Urban Location
    P. R. Salve
    A. Maurya
    S. R. Wate
    Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2006, 77 : 834 - 837
  • [36] Atmospheric dry and wet deposition of mercury in Toronto
    Zhang, Xiaotong
    Siddiqi, Zia
    Song, Xinjie
    Mandiwana, Khakhathi L.
    Yousaf, Muhammad
    Lu, Julia
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 50 : 60 - 65
  • [37] Atmospheric Dry Deposition to Marble and Red Stone
    Ranjit Kumar
    Abha Rani
    K. Maharaj Kumari
    S. S. Srivastava
    Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, 2005, 50 : 243 - 261
  • [38] Atmospheric dry deposition to marble and red stone
    Kumar, R
    Rani, A
    Kumari, KM
    Srivastava, SS
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY, 2005, 50 (03) : 243 - 261
  • [39] Development of an atmospheric particle dry deposition model
    Noll, KE
    Jackson, MM
    Oskouie, AK
    AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 35 (02) : 627 - 636
  • [40] Heavy metals in atmospheric surrogate dry deposition
    Morselli, L
    Cecchini, M
    Grandi, E
    Iannuccilli, A
    Barilli, L
    Olivieri, P
    CHEMOSPHERE, 1999, 38 (04) : 899 - 907