CGH (Comparative Genomic Hybridization) viability as embryo genetic technology of analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Braga, JuMonique [1 ,2 ]
Cavagnoli, Melissa [1 ,2 ]
Vitorino, Raquel
Valle, Marcello [3 ]
Sampaio, Marcos [4 ]
Geber, Selmo [4 ]
机构
[1] Med Clin Origen, Especialista Ginecol Obstetricia Pela FEBRAS, Especialista Reproduaao Assistida Pelo Inst Sapie, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Mestre Pesquisa Clin, Especialista Ginecol Obstetricia Pela FEBRAS, Especialista Reproducao Humana Pela UFMG, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Diretor Clin Origen, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] Diretor Clin Origen, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
关键词
CGH; aneuploidy; biopsy; embryo; a CGH; genetic;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
In recent years, embryonic genetic analysis has been performed mainly by embryo biopsy on the third day of development, where one or two blastomeres are studied using the FISH technique. However, this technique, can not analise the whole cell genome and can not rule out mosaicism, since only a small sample is analyzed. As the CGH (Comparative Genomic Hybridization) and aCGH (microarray analysis) promotes an evaluation of the entire genome from a single cell DNA sample hybridized, allows the diagnosis of losses, gains, deletions, translocations and gene amplifications. Therefore, represents a good alternative to genetic screening in women with advanced age, implantation failure, recurrent abortion and in cases of severe male infertility factor. To this end, the blastocyst biopsy is preferred. Besides the natural selection of embryos reaching the blastocyst stage, the trophectoderm biopsy allows the study of 5 to 10 cells, facilitating the detection of mosaicism. However, as the techniques previously used, it can not detect balanced genomic alterations, gene defects and ploidy. The better selection of embryos enables single embryo transfer, reducing the rates of multiple births and pregnancy risk. However, more randomized studies are needed to establish this technique as the gold standard in genetic evaluation stage.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 107
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) of augmentation cystoplasties
    Appanna, Timson C.
    Doak, Shareen H.
    Jenkins, Spencer A.
    Kynaston, Howard G.
    Stephenson, Timothy P.
    Parry, James M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 14 (06) : 539 - 544
  • [12] Analysts of genetic alterations in primary nasopharyngeal carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
    Sun, L
    Fong, Y
    Sham, JST
    Guo, Y
    Deng, M
    Liang, Q
    Zhang, H
    Zhou, H
    Tideman, H
    Trent, JM
    Guan, XY
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 67 (04) : 74 - 74
  • [13] Statistical analysis of high density comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) arrays
    Rigaill, Guillem
    Dubois, Thierry
    Robin, Stephane
    Barillot, Emmanuel
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2009, 69
  • [14] Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)-array analysis of chromosome 14 in meningiomas
    Espinosa, A. B.
    Maillo, A.
    Merino, M.
    Sousa, P.
    Diaz, P. A.
    Orfao, A.
    Tabernero, M. D.
    CHROMOSOME RESEARCH, 2007, 15 : 190 - 190
  • [15] Use of array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) for embryo assessment: clinical results
    Rubio, Carmen
    Rodrigo, Lorena
    Mir, Pere
    Mateu, Emilia
    Peinado, Vanessa
    Milan, Miguel
    Al-Asmar, Nasser
    Campos-Galindo, Inmaculada
    Garcia, Sandra
    Simon, Carlos
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2013, 99 (04) : 1044 - 1048
  • [16] Genetic alterations in gastric carcinoma and adjacent mucosa detected by comparative genomic hybridization(CGH).
    Koo, J
    Park, M
    Park, S
    Koo, S
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 118 (04) : A1394 - A1394
  • [17] Genetic profiling of yeast industrial strains using in situ comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)
    Wnuk, Maciej
    Panek, Anita
    Golec, Ewelina
    Magda, Michal
    Deregowska, Anna
    Adamczyk, Jagoda
    Lewinska, Anna
    JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2015, 210 : 52 - 56
  • [18] Reproductive oocyte/embryo genetic analysis: comparison between fluorescence in-situ hybridization and comparative genomic hybridization
    Keskintepe, L.
    Sher, G.
    Keskintepe, M.
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2007, 15 (03) : 303 - 309
  • [20] Analysis of the genetic evolution of renal cancer from primary tumors to distant metastases by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)
    Richter, J
    Moch, H
    Bissig, H
    Jiang, F
    Sauter, G
    Mihatsch, MJ
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 1997, 76 (01) : 498 - 498