The Scoring of Matching Questions Tests: A Closer Look

被引:0
|
作者
Jancarik, Antonin [1 ]
Kostelecka, Yvona [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Educ, Prague, Czech Republic
来源
ELECTRONIC JOURNAL OF E-LEARNING | 2015年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
esting; random score; test results; matching type; score formula; formula scoring;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Electronic testing has become a regular part of online courses. Most learning management systems offer a wide range of tools that can be used in electronic tests. With respect to time demands, the most efficient tools are those that allow automatic assessment. The presented paper focuses on one of these tools: matching questions in which one question can be paired with multiple response terms. The aim of the paper is to identify how the types of questions used in a test can affect student results on such tests expressed as test scores. The authors focus mainly on the issue of the possible increase in scores that can occur with the use of closed questions, when students, after selecting the answers to the questions they know the correct answers to, then guess the answers to the remaining questions (see Diamond and Evans, 1973, Ebel and Frisbie, 1986, Albanese, 1986). The authors show how the number of distractors (unused answers) included in a question influences the overall test score. The data on multiple-choice and alternative-response tests are well known, but not much is know about matching questions. Estimating formula scores for matching-question tests is important for determining the threshold at which students demonstrate they possess the required level of knowledge. Here the authors will compare the scores obtained for three types of closed questions: multiple choice, alternative response and matching questions. The analysis of matching assignments in this paper demonstrates that they are a useful tool for testing skills. However, this holds only if the assignment has at least two distractors. Then the informational value of this type of assignment is higher than that of multiple-choice assignments with three distractors. The results currently indicate that these types of assignment are not useful if the objective of the testing is to rank students or to distinguish between very good students - and this applies even if two distractors are used. In the case of such an objective, it is better to use multiple-choice assignments.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 276
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CLOSER LOOK
    QUINE, WV
    JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1977, 74 (07): : 415 - 416
  • [33] How can applicants' reactions to scholastic aptitude tests be improved? A closer look at specific and general tests
    Denker, Marek
    Schuette, Clara
    Kersting, Martin
    Weppert, Daniel
    Stegt, Stephan Josef
    FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 7
  • [34] Donor and Recipient Matching in Facial Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A Closer Look at the Donor Pool
    Kauke, Martin
    Haug, Valentin
    Obed, Doha
    Diehm, Yannick
    Tchiloemba, Bianief
    Safi, Ali-Farid
    Pomahac, Bohdan
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 148 (01) : 194 - 202
  • [35] Ozu: A Closer Look
    Bingham, Adam
    Geist, Kathe
    CINEASTE, 2023, 49 (01):
  • [36] A closer look at α-secretase
    Postina, Rolf
    CURRENT ALZHEIMER RESEARCH, 2008, 5 (02) : 179 - 186
  • [37] A CLOSER LOOK AT NAVIES
    MCCORMACK, S
    CIVIL ENGINEERING-LONDON, 1983, (JUN): : 57 - 57
  • [38] A closer look...
    Canning, Kathie
    2003, Putman Publishing Company (66):
  • [39] Take a closer look
    Moutray, T
    EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2006, 23 (03) : 239 - 239
  • [40] A CLOSER LOOK AT LUKOIL
    KNOTT, D
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1994, 92 (25) : 24 - 24