Innovations and Export Performance: Firm Level Evidence from China

被引:15
|
作者
Cieslik, Andrzej [1 ,2 ]
Qu, Yi [3 ,4 ]
Qu, Ting [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Area Int Econ, Fac Econ Sci, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Univ Warsaw, Econ, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Dongbei Univ Finance & Econ, Business & Management Surrey Int Inst, Dalian, Peoples R China
[4] Univ York, Management, York, N Yorkshire, England
[5] Hunan Acad Social Sci, Inst Reg Econ & Syst Engn, Management & Reg Econ, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
China; export activity; firm heterogeneity; innovations; probit model;
D O I
10.15678/EBER.2018.060402
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: The goal of this article is to study the relationship between innovations and exporting of Chinese firms and identify which type of innovation contributes most to the probability of exporting. Research Design & Methods: We refer to the recent strand in the new trade theory literature that stresses the importance of firm productivity in entering export markets. We distinguish between product, process and managerial innovations that can increase productivity. The empirical investigation is based on the probit model and the firm-level data set covering two years: 2003 and 2012. Findings: Our empirical results show that the probability of exporting is positively related to product and process innovations, firm size, foreign capital participation and foreign technology. Moreover, we find that in 2003 process innovations were more important for export performance than product innovations, while in 2012 it was the opposite. Implications & Recommendations: Firms should coordinate their strategic assets and resources for innovation in order to enhance their overall level of competitiveness. Governments should work on establishing stronger institutional environment necessary to provide firms with protection of intellectual property rights, an easier access to financing of innovation, a lower tax burden upon innovative firms, the higher quality of human resources to firms and more supportive policy packages. Contribution & Value Added: In contrast to previous that used only the R&D spending as the measure of innovation in our study we also use innovation outcomes. In particular, we determine which innovation type is of greatest importance, having controlled for the set of other firm characteristics.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 47
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Export Competition in China: Evidence from Data at Provincial Level
    Zhi Y.
    Luo C.
    Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 2014, 7 (4) : 621 - 638
  • [42] Do export VAT rebates affect firm innovation? Evidence from China
    Kang, Meiling
    Hong, Wenfeng
    Yi, Jun
    Li, Yucheng
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2023,
  • [43] Innovation, firm productivity, and export survival: firm-level evidence from ASEAN developing countries
    Jitsutthiphakorn U.
    Journal of Economic Structures, 10 (1)
  • [44] Currency Valuation, Export Competitiveness, and Firm Profitability: Evidence from Bangladeshi Firm-Level Data
    Choi, Sunghee
    JOURNAL OF ASIAN FINANCE ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2021, 8 (01): : 61 - 69
  • [45] The Effect of Export Promotion on Firm-Level Performance
    Munch, Jakob
    Schaur, Georg
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2018, 10 (01) : 357 - 387
  • [46] Rookie directors and firm performance: Evidence from China
    Chen, Zonghao
    Keefe, Michael O'Connor
    JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2020, 60
  • [47] Environmental Compliance and Firm Performance: Evidence from China
    Yang, Xi
    Yao, Yang
    OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2012, 74 (03) : 397 - 424
  • [48] Leadership structure and firm performance: evidence from China
    Duan, Mengran
    Dong, Tianyi
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2024, 31 (04) : 300 - 306
  • [49] 'E' of ESG and firm performance: Evidence from China
    Qian, Binsheng
    Poshakwale, Sunil
    Tan, Yusen
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 96
  • [50] The effect of export tax rebates on export performance: Theory and evidence from China
    Chen, Chien-Hsun
    Mai, Chao-Cheng
    Yu, Hui-Chuan
    CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 17 (02) : 226 - 235