INTERVENTIONAL ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS

被引:75
|
作者
LINK, H
MASCHMEYER, G
MEYER, P
HIDDEMANN, W
STILLE, W
HELMERKING, M
ADAM, D
机构
[1] FREE UNIV BERLIN, KLINIKUM RUDOLF VIRCHOW, ROBERT ROSSLE HOSP, DEPT MED ONCOL & APPL MOLEC BIOL, D-13122 BERLIN, GERMANY
[2] UNIV KLIN WURZBURG, MED POLIKLIN, D-97070 WURZBURG, GERMANY
[3] UNIV GOTTINGEN, MED KLIN, DEPT HEMATOL & ONCOL, D-37075 GOTTINGEN, GERMANY
[4] UNIV KLIN FRANKFURT, CTR INTERNAL MED, D-60590 FRANKFURT, GERMANY
[5] PAUL EHRLICH GESELL CHEMOTHERAPY, D-81701 MUNICH, GERMANY
[6] UNIV MUNICH, CHILDRENS HOSP, D-80337 MUNICH, GERMANY
关键词
FEVER; NEUTROPENIA; INFECTION; PNEUMONIA; ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY; ANTIFUNGALS; RISK FACTORS;
D O I
10.1007/BF01700277
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In this prospective multicenter trial, treatment strategies for 1573 patients with neutropenia < 1000/mu l and fever greater than or equal to 38.5 degrees C after cytotoxic chemotherapy were compared. Patients with unexplained fever were randomized to a three-phase sequential study for different established drug regimens. If an infection could be defined microbiologically or clinically, treat ment modifications were determined. In phase I, treatment for all patients consisted of acylaminopenicillin (PEN) plus aminoglycoside (AMG); or third-generation cephalosporin (CEPH) plus AMG; or PEN plus CEPH. In 800 patients with unexplained fever the response rates were: PEN/AMG (n = 258): 74.4%, CEPH/AMG (n = 252): 73.4%; PEN/CEPH (n = 290): 70.0%. Total response rate was 72.5%. In phase II, patients not responding after 3 days received PEN/CEPH/vancomycin (n = 70) or PEN/CEPH/AMG (n = 74). The respective response rates were 52.9% and 55.4%, total 54.2%. If fever did not resolve, the patients received either PEN/CEPH (n = 40) or imipenem/cilastatin (n = 59) both in combination with amphotericin-B/5-flucytosin/rifampin. The response rates were 62.5% and 79.7%, respectively (p = 0.07), total 72.7%. No significant dif ferences between the treatment modalities compared were found. Analyzing all three phases together, 91.3% of patients with unexplained fever were cured. The response rate was also analyzed according to patients with gram-positive bacteremia (n = 183), response rate 82.5%; gram-negative organisms (n = 145) 78.6%; fungemia (n = 51) 43.1% (p < 0.001); lung infiltrates (n = 269) 61.3% (p < 0.001); clinically documented infections (n = 198) 84.4%; and clinically and microbiologically documented infections (n = 84) 82.1%. If infections were diagnosed after at least 5 febrile days, more lung infiltrates and fungal infections occurred (p < 0.001). Leukocytes rising above 500/mu during the infection predicted better response rates (p < 0.001): in unexplained fever 97.8% vs 86.5% and lower death rates 1.5% vs 8.5%. In documented infections the response rates were then 89.9% vs 62.3% and the death rates 7.0% vs 20.5%. Therapy of neutropenic fever and infections must be adapted according to risk factors and should include early empiric antifungal therapy. The therapeutic and prophylactic use of hematopoietic growth factors to overcome neutropenia should be evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 243
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pharmacokinetics of meropenem in febrile neutropenic patients
    Nyhlén, A
    Ljungberg, B
    Nilsson-Ehle, I
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 16 (11) : 797 - 802
  • [42] Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in febrile neutropenic patients
    Nyhlén, A
    Ljungberg, B
    Nilsson-Ehle, I
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2001, 33 (03) : 222 - 226
  • [43] Article: Oral vs. intravenous empirical antimicrobial therapy in febrile neutropenic patients receiving childhood cancer chemotherapy Reply
    Brunetto, Algemir
    Gregianin, Lauro
    Cagol, Angela Rech
    JORNAL DE PEDIATRIA, 2010, 86 (03) : 254 - 254
  • [44] Doripenem Versus Meropenem For Empirical antimicrobial Therapy In High Risk Febrile Neutropenic Patients With Hematological Malignancies: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
    Fujisawa, Yuka
    Oyake, Tatsuo
    Mine, Takahiro
    Aoki, Yusei
    Tsukushi, Yasuhiko
    Sugawara, Takeshi
    Seguchi, Masato
    Hanamura, Ichiro
    Nakagawa, Yasuaki
    Murai, Kazunori
    Ito, Shigeki
    Ishida, Yoji
    BLOOD, 2013, 122 (21)
  • [45] A European organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - International Antimicrobial Therapy Group study of secondary infections in febrile, neutropenic patients with cancer
    Akova, M
    Paesmans, M
    Calandra, T
    Viscoli, C
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2005, 40 (02) : 239 - 245
  • [46] TIMENTIN IN COMBINATION WITH TOBRAMYCIN AS EMPIRICAL THERAPY IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS WITH HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES
    KRIEGER, O
    BERNHART, M
    PLOHOWICH, R
    NEMEC, H
    LUTZ, D
    JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1986, 17 : 211 - 217
  • [47] STRATEGY FOR ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS ON SELECTIVE ANTIBIOTIC DECONTAMINATION
    DEMARIE, S
    VANDENBROEK, PJ
    WILLEMZE, R
    VANFURTH, R
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1993, 12 (12) : 897 - 906
  • [48] Efficacy of cefepime therapy for Enterobacter bacteraemia, with special emphasis on febrile neutropenic patients
    Lee, Jeong-A
    Kang, Cheol-In
    Joung, Mi-Kyong
    Moon, Soo-Youn
    Chung, Doo Ryeon
    Ko, Kwan Soo
    Peck, Kyong Ran
    Song, Jae-Hoon
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2010, 42 (6-7) : 557 - 559
  • [49] A COMPARISON OF IMIPENEM TO CEFTAZIDIME WITH OR WITHOUT AMIKACIN AS EMPIRIC THERAPY IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS
    ROLSTON, KVI
    BERKEY, P
    BODEY, GP
    ANAISSIE, EJ
    KHARDORI, NM
    JOSHI, JH
    KEATING, MJ
    HOLMES, FA
    CABANILLAS, FF
    ELTING, L
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1992, 152 (02) : 283 - 291
  • [50] Monotherapy versus dual therapy based on risk categorization of febrile neutropenic patients
    Ohyashiki, K
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 : S56 - S58