INTERVENTIONAL ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS

被引:75
|
作者
LINK, H
MASCHMEYER, G
MEYER, P
HIDDEMANN, W
STILLE, W
HELMERKING, M
ADAM, D
机构
[1] FREE UNIV BERLIN, KLINIKUM RUDOLF VIRCHOW, ROBERT ROSSLE HOSP, DEPT MED ONCOL & APPL MOLEC BIOL, D-13122 BERLIN, GERMANY
[2] UNIV KLIN WURZBURG, MED POLIKLIN, D-97070 WURZBURG, GERMANY
[3] UNIV GOTTINGEN, MED KLIN, DEPT HEMATOL & ONCOL, D-37075 GOTTINGEN, GERMANY
[4] UNIV KLIN FRANKFURT, CTR INTERNAL MED, D-60590 FRANKFURT, GERMANY
[5] PAUL EHRLICH GESELL CHEMOTHERAPY, D-81701 MUNICH, GERMANY
[6] UNIV MUNICH, CHILDRENS HOSP, D-80337 MUNICH, GERMANY
关键词
FEVER; NEUTROPENIA; INFECTION; PNEUMONIA; ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY; ANTIFUNGALS; RISK FACTORS;
D O I
10.1007/BF01700277
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In this prospective multicenter trial, treatment strategies for 1573 patients with neutropenia < 1000/mu l and fever greater than or equal to 38.5 degrees C after cytotoxic chemotherapy were compared. Patients with unexplained fever were randomized to a three-phase sequential study for different established drug regimens. If an infection could be defined microbiologically or clinically, treat ment modifications were determined. In phase I, treatment for all patients consisted of acylaminopenicillin (PEN) plus aminoglycoside (AMG); or third-generation cephalosporin (CEPH) plus AMG; or PEN plus CEPH. In 800 patients with unexplained fever the response rates were: PEN/AMG (n = 258): 74.4%, CEPH/AMG (n = 252): 73.4%; PEN/CEPH (n = 290): 70.0%. Total response rate was 72.5%. In phase II, patients not responding after 3 days received PEN/CEPH/vancomycin (n = 70) or PEN/CEPH/AMG (n = 74). The respective response rates were 52.9% and 55.4%, total 54.2%. If fever did not resolve, the patients received either PEN/CEPH (n = 40) or imipenem/cilastatin (n = 59) both in combination with amphotericin-B/5-flucytosin/rifampin. The response rates were 62.5% and 79.7%, respectively (p = 0.07), total 72.7%. No significant dif ferences between the treatment modalities compared were found. Analyzing all three phases together, 91.3% of patients with unexplained fever were cured. The response rate was also analyzed according to patients with gram-positive bacteremia (n = 183), response rate 82.5%; gram-negative organisms (n = 145) 78.6%; fungemia (n = 51) 43.1% (p < 0.001); lung infiltrates (n = 269) 61.3% (p < 0.001); clinically documented infections (n = 198) 84.4%; and clinically and microbiologically documented infections (n = 84) 82.1%. If infections were diagnosed after at least 5 febrile days, more lung infiltrates and fungal infections occurred (p < 0.001). Leukocytes rising above 500/mu during the infection predicted better response rates (p < 0.001): in unexplained fever 97.8% vs 86.5% and lower death rates 1.5% vs 8.5%. In documented infections the response rates were then 89.9% vs 62.3% and the death rates 7.0% vs 20.5%. Therapy of neutropenic fever and infections must be adapted according to risk factors and should include early empiric antifungal therapy. The therapeutic and prophylactic use of hematopoietic growth factors to overcome neutropenia should be evaluated.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 243
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Interventional antimicrobial therapy in febrile neutropenic patients
    Maschmeyer, G
    DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 1999, 34 (03) : 205 - 212
  • [2] Empiric antimicrobial therapy in the febrile neutropenic host
    Giamarellou, H
    BALKAN CONGRESS OF ONCOLOGY, 1996, : 731 - 738
  • [4] Diagnosis and antimicrobial therapy of lung infiltrates in febrile neutropenic cancer patients
    Maschmeyer G.
    Current Infectious Disease Reports, 2011, 13 (6) : 510 - 516
  • [5] Empirical second-line antimicrobial therapy in febrile neutropenic cancer patients
    Dong, W
    Liu, L
    Li, Y
    Ren, X
    Cheng, C
    Liu, S
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) : 778S - 778S
  • [6] NON-NEPHROTOXIC EMPIRIC ANTIMICROBIAL THERAPY IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC CANCER-PATIENTS
    KATTAN, J
    DROZ, JP
    RIBRAG, V
    AZAB, M
    BOUTANLAROZE, A
    ANDREMONT, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 28A (4-5) : 867 - 870
  • [7] What’s new in diagnosis and antimicrobial therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with lung infiltrates?
    C. Rieger
    S. Barlow
    G. Maschmeyer
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2014, 40 : 1549 - 1552
  • [8] INTERVENTIONAL ANTIMICROBIAL STRATEGY IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS - RESULTS OF A MULTICENTER STUDY IN 1,260 PATIENTS WITH HEMATOLOGICAL MALIGNANCIES
    MASCHMEYER, G
    LINK, H
    HIDDEMANN, W
    MEYER, P
    HELMERKING, M
    ADAM, D
    ONKOLOGIE, 1990, 13 (01): : 38 - 42
  • [9] What's new in diagnosis and antimicrobial therapy of febrile neutropenic patients with lung infiltrates?
    Rieger, C.
    Barlow, S.
    Maschmeyer, G.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2014, 40 (10) : 1549 - 1552
  • [10] Empiric antimicrobial therapy of febrile neutropenic patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation
    Antabli, BA
    Bross, P
    Siegel, RS
    Small, CD
    Tabbara, IA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 1999, 13 (02) : 127 - 130