FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION AS A FUNCTION OF SIGNAL FREQUENCY AND LEVEL IN NORMAL-HEARING AND HEARING-IMPAIRED LISTENERS

被引:28
|
作者
FREYMAN, RL [1 ]
NELSON, DA [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MINNESOTA,MINNEAPOLIS,MN 55455
来源
关键词
FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HEARING LOSS; PSYCHOACOUSTICS;
D O I
10.1044/jshr.3406.1371
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
Frequency difference limens (DLFs) for pure tones were obtained over a wide range of frequencies and levels from 7 normal-hearing subjects and 16 ears of 12 listeners with sensorineural hearing losses. The normal data were fitted with a general prediction equation. Variability of the data around the DLFs estimated by the equation was quantified and used to evaluate the DLFs from the hearing-impaired listeners. The majority of DLFs from impaired listeners were poorer than one standard deviation above the estimates of the normal equation at all frequencies and sensation levels (SLs). The portion of the equation concerned with sensation level was fitted to each listener's data at each frequency. The slopes of these functions indicated that, on average, the rate of improvement of the DLF with sensation level was similar in the two groups of subjects. These results suggest that it would be reasonable to compare DLFs from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners at equivalent sensation levels. The intercepts of the DLF-intensity functions represent asymptotic values obtained at high SLs. These asymptotic DLFs were abnormal in the majority of hearing-impaired subjects, with more than half the data in excess of two standard deviations above normal. However, among those subjects, the correlation between the DLF deficit and the amount of hearing loss at the test frequency was not strong (r = +.27).
引用
收藏
页码:1371 / 1386
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] FREQUENCY-SELECTIVITY AND CONSONANT RECOGNITION FOR HEARING-IMPAIRED AND NORMAL-HEARING LISTENERS WITH EQUIVALENT MASKED THRESHOLDS
    DUBNO, JR
    SCHAEFER, AB
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1995, 97 (02): : 1165 - 1174
  • [32] AUDITORY TIME CONSTANTS FOR OFF-FREQUENCY FORWARD MASKING IN NORMAL-HEARING AND HEARING-IMPAIRED LISTENERS
    NELSON, DA
    PAVLOV, R
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1989, 32 (02): : 298 - 306
  • [33] Sound Quality Effects of an Adaptive Nonlinear Frequency Compression Processor with Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners
    Glista, Danielle
    Hawkins, Marianne
    Vaisberg, Jonathan M.
    Pourmand, Nazanin
    Parsa, Vijay
    Scollie, Susan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2019, 30 (07) : 552 - 563
  • [34] FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS IN NORMAL AND HEARING-IMPAIRED LISTENERS
    JESTEADT, W
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 1980, 89 (05): : 88 - 95
  • [35] FREQUENCY RESOLUTION AND DISCRIMINATION OF CONSTANT AND DYNAMIC TONES IN NORMAL AND HEARING-IMPAIRED LISTENERS
    TYLER, RS
    WOOD, EJ
    FERNANDES, M
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1983, 74 (04): : 1190 - 1199
  • [36] Informational masking in hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners: Sensation level and decision weights
    Alexander, JM
    Lutfi, RA
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2004, 116 (04): : 2234 - 2247
  • [37] FACTORS INFLUENCING THE MASKING LEVEL DIFFERENCE IN COCHLEAR HEARING-IMPAIRED AND NORMAL-HEARING LISTENERS
    HALL, JW
    TYLER, RS
    FERNANDES, MA
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1984, 27 (01): : 145 - 154
  • [38] Broadband Auditory Stream Segregation by Hearing-Impaired and Normal-Hearing Listeners
    Valentine, Susie
    Lentz, Jennifer J.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2008, 51 (05): : 1341 - 1352
  • [39] Suppression and comodulation masking release in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners
    Ernst, Stephan M. A.
    Rennies, Jan
    Kollmeier, Birger
    Verhey, Jesko L.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2010, 128 (01): : 300 - 309
  • [40] EVALUATION OF A SPEECH ENHANCEMENT STRATEGY WITH NORMAL-HEARING AND HEARING-IMPAIRED LISTENERS
    JAMIESON, DG
    BRENNAN, RL
    CORNELISSE, LE
    EAR AND HEARING, 1995, 16 (03): : 274 - 286