The Future of U.S. Infrastructure: Proposals for Progress

被引:1
|
作者
Wahba, Sadek [1 ]
机构
[1] Morgan Stanley, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6622.2011.00346.x
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
America's transportation, energy, and water systems are in desperate need of maintenance, and new development must be encouraged to secure the country's economic future. This article proposes several far-reaching but concrete and immediate steps to address these challenges: First, the U.S. must have a clear, comprehensive, long-term plan for the development and maintenance of the country's infrastructure, one that will raise public awareness and promote new approaches. It should facilitate the development of such a vision at every level of government, with the aim of building consensus and encouraging local solutions. Next, the public sector should build an internal capability for evaluating projects, a centralized clearinghouse of best practices and educational resources to provide regional and local authorities with the information and expertise they need to enlist private investment in appropriate and productive ways. This is particularly true for Public-Private Partnerships, which are mistakenly viewed by many as a panacea. Without careful scrutiny of such transactions, many will fail to realize the benefits that well-designed PPPs are expected to deliver. Finally, despite best intentions, little progress has been made on the political front in addressing the crisis. A National Infrastructure Commission charged with assessing the country's needs and resources, identifying best practices, and making long-term recommendations may be the catalyst needed to get past the gridlock, a driving force that can rise above the politics, draw from the best ideas, and provide a long-term vision and pathway. To be most effective, the Commission should recruit a broad and nonpartisan membership, leverage the work of existing organizations, and provide a united front.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / +
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] U.S. and Israeli young women’s future perceptions
    Rinat Michael
    TaeSun Kim
    Ashley Hutchison
    Rachel Gali Cinamon
    Lawrence H. Gerstein
    Juno Park
    Yuri Choi
    Yamini Bellare
    Rachael Collins
    International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 2017, 17 : 121 - 141
  • [32] Battling Procedural Windmills: Introductions of Proposals to Change U.S. Senate Procedure
    Dopieralla, Jakub
    POLITOLOGICKY CASOPIS-CZECH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2021, (02): : 115 - 129
  • [33] SEVEN YEARS OF U.S. DEFENSE ACQUISITION RESEARCH: ANALYSIS OF PROPOSALS AND PROJECTS
    Shaffer, Karey L.
    Snider, Keith F.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT, 2014, 14 (04) : 451 - 472
  • [34] The future of the humanities: U.S. domination and other issues
    Clark, Timothy
    Royle, Nicholas
    OXFORD LITERARY REVIEW, 2006, 28 : 3 - 3
  • [35] U.S. army battery needs - present and future
    Hamlen, R.P., 1600, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, United States (10):
  • [36] Trials of Engagement: The Future of U.S. Public Diplomacy
    Richmond, Yale
    JOURNAL OF COLD WAR STUDIES, 2012, 14 (02) : 165 - 166
  • [37] Future shock: Challenges facing U.S. radiology
    Lexa, Frank J.
    APPLIED RADIOLOGY, 2015, 44 (06) : 5 - 7
  • [38] Digital manipulation and the future of electoral democracy in the U.S.
    Zachary, G. Pascal
    IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, 2020, 1 (02): : 104 - 112
  • [39] U.S. Refiners reckon with uncertain energy future
    Jenkins, Scott
    Chemical Engineering (United States), 2019, 126 (05): : 14 - 17
  • [40] The Gates Foundation and the Future of U.S. "Public" Schools
    Hartlep, Nicholas D.
    EDUCATIONAL STUDIES-AESA, 2013, 49 (01): : 92 - 96