A contemporary dose selection algorithm for stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastases - An initial report

被引:0
|
作者
Colaco, Rovel J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yu, James B. [1 ,2 ]
Bond, James S. [1 ,2 ]
Bindra, Ranjit S. [1 ,2 ]
Contessa, Joseph N. [1 ,2 ]
Knisely, Jonathan P. S. [4 ,5 ]
Chiang, Veronica L. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Yale New Haven Med Ctr, Dept Therapeut Radiol, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Med, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[3] Christie Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Clin Oncol, Manchester M20 4BX, Lancs, England
[4] North Shore LIJ Hlth Syst, Dept Radiat Med, Hempstead, NY 11549 USA
[5] Hofstra Univ, Sch Med, Hempstead, NY 11549 USA
[6] Yale New Haven Med Ctr, Dept Neurosurg, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT | 2016年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词
brain metastases; dose selection; stereotactic radiosurgery; gamma knife;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Indications and treatment goals for SRS have changed since the publication of RTOG 90-05. We present initial retrospective outcomes from a new dose selection algorithm in use at our institution felt to be more contemporary with doses being used in the radiosurgery community today and report our local control and toxicity outcomes. This dose selection algorithm will be subject to a forthcoming prospective phase 2 trial. Introduction: To evaluate safety and efficacy of an institutional dose selection algorithm in the treatment of brain metastases (BM) with single fraction radio-surgery (SRS). Methods and Materials: The medical records of 65 patients with <= 10 BM treated with GK at our institution between April 2012 and October 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. The prescription doses used in this study ranged from 16-22Gy and were based upon RTOG 90-05 guideline doses subsequently modified at our institution depending on lesion number, lesion volume, institutional experience and prior history of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Primary endpoint was local recurrence (LR) with additional outcomes measured including distant intracranial recurrence (DIR), death without local recurrence (DWLR) and alive and disease free (ADF). Fine Gray competing risk analysis was used to examine factors affecting local recurrence. Results: Median follow up was 8.9 months (range 1.0-29.6months) and 12 month overall survival was 37% (95% CI 24.9-49.1%). Overall local recurrence rate was 7.7%. On competing risks regression analysis, no variable was significantly associated with local recurrence, including previous whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), (SHR 1.21 [95% CI 0.13-11.5], p=0.87 and radioresistant versus radiosensitive histology (SHR 0.51 [95% CI 0.06-7.73], p=0.55). No patient developed grade 3 or higher neurotoxicity at 12 months following GK. Conclusions: Initial local control and toxicity results from our institutional dose selection algorithm are reported here. Comparison of our results with RTOG 90-05 is difficult due to significant differences in the patient population and their treatments. The applicability of this algorithm merits further investigation across multiple centers for the purpose of treatment and clinical trial standardization in single fraction SRS and will be the subject of a forthcoming phase 2 prospective study within our own institution.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 52
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of melanoma brain metastases.
    Guerrero Tejada, M.
    Tovar, I.
    Zurita, M.
    Del Moral, R.
    Exposito, J.
    Martinez, M.
    Gentil, M. A.
    Linares, I.
    Vargas, P.
    Prieto, C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S124 - S124
  • [32] TREATMENT OF RETROPERITONEAL LEIOMYOSARCOMA BRAIN METASTASES WITH STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY
    McClelland, Shearwood, III
    Gardner, Ulysses
    Langer, Mark
    Shiue, Kevin
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2020, 22 : 191 - 191
  • [33] TREATMENT OF LARGE BRAIN METASTASES WITH STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY (SRS)
    Zimmerman, Amy L.
    Vogelbaum, Michael A.
    Barnett, Gene H.
    Murphy, Erin S.
    Suh, John H.
    Angelov, Lilyana
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Chao, Samuel T.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 15 : 188 - 188
  • [34] Treatment of Five or More Brain Metastases With Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Hunter, Grant K.
    Suh, John H.
    Reuther, Alwyn M.
    Vogelbaum, Michael A.
    Barnett, Gene H.
    Angelov, Lilyana
    Weil, Robert J.
    Neyman, Gennady
    Chao, Samuel T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (05): : 1394 - 1398
  • [35] Stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of brain metastases: The current evidence
    Lippitz, Bodo
    Lindquist, Christer
    Paddick, Ian
    Peterson, David
    O'Neill, Kevin
    Beaney, Ronald
    CANCER TREATMENT REVIEWS, 2014, 40 (01) : 48 - 59
  • [36] Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Large Brain Metastases
    Tan, D. Y.
    Puri, A.
    Wong, F.
    Chua, E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S701 - S702
  • [37] Treatment of Five or More Brain Metastases with Stereotactic Radiosurgery
    Hunter, G. K.
    Suh, J.
    Vogelbaum, M.
    Barnett, G.
    Angelov, L.
    Weil, R.
    Reuther, A. M.
    Neyman, G.
    Chao, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (03): : S504 - S504
  • [38] Dose selection in stereotactic radiosurgery
    Flickinger, JC
    Kondziolka, D
    Lunsford, LD
    NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 10 (02) : 271 - +
  • [39] Comparison of Fractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Single-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Brain Metastases
    Savir, G.
    Ebner, D. K.
    Chan, J.
    Rava, P.
    Cielo, D.
    Kinsella, T.
    DiPetrillo, T. A.
    Wazer, D.
    Hepel, J. T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S319 - S320
  • [40] Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Multiple Brain Metastases: A Dose-Volume Study
    Kairn, Tanya
    Zolfaghari, Somayeh
    Papworth, Daniel
    West, Mark
    Schlect, David
    Crowe, Scott
    WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING 2018, VOL 3, 2019, 68 (03): : 443 - 446