The Linguistic Vitality of American Indian Sign Language: Endangered, yet Not Vanished

被引:4
|
作者
Davis, Jeffrey E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Sign Language Linguist, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1353/sls.2016.0011
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This article examines the linguistic status and potential for revitalization of American Indian Sign Language (AISL), which is considered an endangered language variety. It reports recent findings from the first documentary linguistics fieldwork carried out in over fifty years to focus on the AISL variety, which has been learned and used as a primary or secondary language among members of some American Indian communities since the eighteenth century and possibly earlier. AISL has been maintained over the past several generations chiefly by tribal elders and these efforts have been buoyed by deaf tribal members who have acquired it as a fluent means of communication within their own native communities. While research continues to identify different AISL dialects and the number of remaining native signers, reportedly hundreds of North American Indians still use and understand AISL to varying degrees of proficiency and mutual intelligibility. The AISL variety has been transmitted for many generations and used internationally among dozens of American Indian nations of the United States and Canada; today, representing mainly Algonquian and Siouan language families. Up to now, both deaf and hearing tribal members have served a vital role in the development and transmission of indigenous sign language. Hence, it has been well documented that American indigenous sign language served a wide variety of discourse functions and purposes-ranging from in-group (shared within a single tribe or family) to international communication (shared between different Indian tribes and nations). The article also highlights how documentary linguistics contributes to language preservation and revitalization.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 562
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Handshape monitoring: Evaluation of linguistic and perceptual factors in the processing of American Sign Language
    Grosvald, Michael
    Lachaud, Christian
    Corina, David
    LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 2012, 27 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [32] A deep sign language recognition system for Indian sign language
    Das, Soumen
    Biswas, Saroj Kr
    Purkayastha, Biswajit
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2023, 35 (02): : 1469 - 1481
  • [33] A deep sign language recognition system for Indian sign language
    Soumen Das
    Saroj Kr. Biswas
    Biswajit Purkayastha
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35 : 1469 - 1481
  • [34] AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE
    MCELWEE, J
    SMITHSONIAN, 1992, 23 (06) : 10 - 10
  • [35] INDIAN SIGN LANGUAGE RECOGNITION
    Deora, Divya
    Bajaj, Nikesh
    2012 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGY TRENDS IN ELECTRONICS, COMMUNICATION AND NETWORKING (ET2ECN), 2012,
  • [36] Sign language endangerment and linguistic diversity
    Braithwaite, Ben
    LANGUAGE, 2019, 95 (01) : E161 - E187
  • [37] Sign language and linguistic universals.
    Cormier, Kearsy
    JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS, 2006, 42 (03) : 738 - 742
  • [38] Linguistic Ethnography and Sign Language Studies
    Kusters, Annelies
    Hou, Lynn
    SIGN LANGUAGE STUDIES, 2020, 20 (04) : 561 - 571
  • [39] Sign language and linguistic universals.
    Reagan, Timothy
    STUDIES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION, 2007, 29 (04) : 624 - 625
  • [40] Deficits in the coordination of bimanual movements in American sign language: Implications for interhemispheric linguistic cooperation
    Gardner, C
    Bettger, J
    Bellugi, U
    Klima, E
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2002, 83 (01) : 200 - 202