Comparison of Fusion Rate Between Autogenous Tricortical Iliac Crest Bone Graft and Hydroxyapatite Block Graft in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Zulkefli, A. [1 ]
Jeyasilan, K. [1 ]
Zairul, A. K. B. [1 ]
Ramanathan, R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Raja Permaisuri Bainun, Dept Orthopaed, Ipoh 30990, Perak, Malaysia
关键词
Iliac Crest Bone Graft; Hydroxyapatite; Cervical Discectomy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To compare the fusion rate between autogenous tricortical iliac crest bone graft and hydroxyapatite block graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. Methodology: Retrospective review of cases that underwent ACDF surgery between 2005 and 2008. They were divided into two groups based on the graft material used. Assessment of fusion at 6 months post-surgery was carried out based on the static lateral cervical radiograph. Results: 32 cases were reviewed; 16 in each arm. There were 29 discectomies performed in the hydroxyapatite group as compared to 22 in the iliac crest group. 18 levels in the hydrxyapatite group showed radiological fusion while in the iliac crest group there were 21 levels fused. Seven patients had donor site pain. Conclusion: The fusion rate for autogenous tricortical iliac crest bone graft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion surgery was 95%, a more superior fusion rate than that of hydroxyapatite block graft which was 62.1%.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 39
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hinged Roof Reconstruction of Anterior Iliac Crest after Harvesting Bicortical Strut Graft for Anterior Cervical Fusion
    Kim, Jung-Suk
    Kim, Yong -Min
    Yi, Seung-Rim
    Kim, In Hee
    Kang, Minwook
    Kim, Do-Kyoon
    SPINE SURGERY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 7 (02): : 179 - 182
  • [32] Comparison of hydroxyapatite granules to autogenous bone graft in fusion cages in a goat model - Commentary
    Ray, CD
    SURGICAL NEUROLOGY, 1998, 49 (06): : 633 - 634
  • [33] Postdiscectomy cervical fusion.: Clinico-radiological study comparing iliac crest bone graft, anterior cervical plate with bone graft and cage-plate GD
    González-Darder, JM
    Martínez, JVP
    Tatay, RF
    NEUROCIRUGIA, 2001, 12 (02): : 143 - 151
  • [34] A prospective randomized comparison of rectangular titanium cage fusion and iliac crest autograft fusion in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy
    Thomé, C
    Leheta, O
    Krauss, JK
    Zevgaridis, D
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2006, 4 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [35] Prospective nonrandomized comparison of an allograft with bone morphogenic protein versus an iliac-crest autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
    Buttermann, Glenn Robin
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (03): : 426 - 435
  • [36] Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with "mini-invasive" harvesting of iliac crest graft versus polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: A retrospective outcome analysis
    Spallone, A.
    Marchione, P.
    Li Voti, P.
    Ferrante, L.
    Visocchi, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 12 (12) : 1328 - 1332
  • [37] Outcomes following posterior fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with and without autogenous iliac crest bone graft harvesting
    Crawford III C.H.
    Carreon L.Y.
    Lenke L.G.
    Sucato D.J.
    Richards III B.S.
    Spine Deformity, 2013, 1 (2) : 144 - 147
  • [38] Biomechanical comparison between anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and without fusion
    Iencean, Andrei Stefan
    Iencean, Stefan Mircea
    Poeata, Ion
    BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH-INDIA, 2017, 28 (04): : 1706 - 1713
  • [39] ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY AND FUSION USING A POROUS HYDROXYAPATITE BONE-GRAFT SUBSTITUTE
    ZDEBLICK, TA
    COOKE, ME
    KUNZ, DN
    WILSON, D
    MCCABE, RP
    SPINE, 1994, 19 (20) : 2348 - 2357
  • [40] Sternal cancellous bone graft harvest for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with interbody cage devices
    Sangala, Jaypal Reddy
    Nichols, Tann
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Melton, Mark
    Vale, Fernando L.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 112 (06) : 470 - 473