RULE OF REASON AND PER-SE CONCEPT - PRICE FIXING AND MARKET DIVISION .2.

被引：83

作者：

BORK, RH ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] YALE UNIV,NEW HAVEN,CT

来源：

YALE LAW JOURNAL | 1966年 / 75卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/794663

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：373 / 475

页数：103

共 49 条

[21] ALBRECHT AFTER ARCO - MAXIMUM RESALE PRICE FIXING MOVES TOWARD THE RULE OF REASON
BLAIR, RD
LANG, GL
VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW, 1991, 44 (05) : 1007 - 1039
[22] IN DEFENSE OF THE PER-SE RULE - JUSTICE STEWART STRUGGLE TO PRESERVE THE 4TH-AMENDMENTS WARRANT CLAUSE
GREENHALGH, WW
YOST, MJ
AMERICAN CRIMINAL LAW REVIEW, 1994, 31 (04) : 1013 - 1098
[23] THE INVESTMENT BANKERS CASE: THE USE OF SEMANTICS TO AVOID THE PER SE ILLEGALITY OF PRICE FIXING
不详
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1954, 63 (03): : 399 - 407
[24] Loyalty discounts, exclusive dealing and bundling: rule of reason, quasi-per-se, price-cost test, or something in between?
Eilat, Assaf
Gilo, David
Sagi, Guy
JOURNAL OF ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT, 2016, 4 (02) : 345 - 380
[25] The Per Se Rule on Minimum Resale Price Maintenance in Korea - A Time to Change
Choi, Yo Sop
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2011, 42 (05) : 570 - 597
[26] COMPETITION POLICY WITH OPTIMALLY DIFFERENTIATED RULES INSTEAD OF "PER SE RULES VS RULE OF REASON"
Christiansen, Arndt
Kerber, Wolfgang
JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS, 2006, 2 (02) : 215 - 244
[27] Resale Price Maintenance (RPM) Agreements Under AML 2008 - Per Se Illegal Treatment vis-a-vis the Rule-of-Reason Approach
Bu, Qingxiu
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2015, 46 (05) : 565 - 587
[28] STREAMLINING ANTITRUST LITIGATION BY FACIAL EXAMINATION OF RESTRAINTS - THE BURGER COURT AND THE PER SE - RULE OF REASON DISTINCTION
BRUNET, E
WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 1984, 60 (01) : 1 - 32
[29] THE EXCHANGE OF PRICE INFORMATION AS A RESTRAINT OF TRADE - REASSESSING PER-SE RULES IN LIGHT OF 1ST AMENDMENT PROTECTION OF COMMERCIAL SPEECH
MAGINNESS, CR
FORDHAM LAW REVIEW, 1980, 48 (06) : 1005 - 1026
[30] BUSINESS-ELECTRONICS-CORP V SHARP-ELECTRONICS-CORP - MONSANTO PROGENY AND THE CONGRESSIONAL PROPOSAL TO CODIFY THE PER SE RULE AGAINST VERTICAL PRICE FIXING
DOHERTY, DO
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 1989, 38 (04): : 963 - 1000

← 1 2 3 4 5 →