Overemployment, executive pay-for-performance sensitivity and economic consequences: Evidence from China

被引:17
|
作者
Chen, Donghua [1 ]
Shen, Yongjian [1 ]
Xin, Fu [1 ]
Zhang, Tianqin [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Res Inst Accounting & Finance, Accounting Dept, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Government intervention; Surplus labor force; Pay-for-performance sensitivity; Policy burden; Policy gains;
D O I
10.1016/j.cjar.2012.03.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Using a sample of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges during the 1999-2009 period, we investigate the effects of overemployment on executives' pay-for-performance sensitivity (PPS) and analyze how the behavior of firms with high/low PPS affects the number of surplus employees. We find the existence of a redundant workforce significantly weakens PPS and the role of accounting measures in performance assessment. In contrast to prior literature, we find that higher PPS is associated with a stronger incentive to lay off redundant employees and to limit future employee numbers. We also find that weaker government intervention strengthens managerial control over the future size of the workforce. Finally, our findings suggest that a heavier government policy burden on SOEs leads to lower tax rates and more government gains. (C) 2012 China Journal of Accounting Research. Founded by Sun Yat-sen University and City University of Hong Kong. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 26
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Air pollution and executive incentive: Evidence from pay-performance sensitivity
    Yu, Shuangli
    Shen, Yuxin
    Zhang, Fan
    Shen, Yongjian
    Xu, Zefeng
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 82
  • [12] How does independent directors' reputation influence pay-for-performance? Evidence from China
    Yang, HaiYan
    Yao, Daifei
    Qu, Xin
    ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE, 2022, 62 (01): : 959 - 1007
  • [13] Evidence of Upcoding in Pay-for-Performance Programs
    Bastani, Hamsa
    Goh, Joel
    Bayati, Mohsen
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2019, 65 (03) : 1042 - 1060
  • [14] Independent directors, non-controlling directors, and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity: Evidence from Chinese non-state owned enterprises
    Zhou, Fangzhao
    Fan, Yunqi
    An, Yunbi
    Zhong, Ligang
    PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2017, 43 : 55 - 71
  • [15] Individualized Pay-for-Performance Arrangements: Peer Reactions and Consequences
    Abdulsalam, Dhuha
    Maltarich, Mark A.
    Nyberg, Anthony J.
    Reilly, Greg
    Martin, Melissa
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 106 (08) : 1202 - 1223
  • [16] PHYSICIAN RESPONSE TO PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM A NATURAL EXPERIMENT
    Li, Jinhu
    Hurley, Jeremiah
    Decicca, Philip
    Buckley, Gioia
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2014, 23 (08) : 962 - 978
  • [17] The multiple aims of pay-for-performance and the risk of unintended consequences
    Friebel, Rocco
    Steventon, Adam
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2016, 25 (11) : 827 - 831
  • [18] Does pay-for-performance design matter? Evidence from Brazil
    Russo, Leticia Xander
    Powell-Jackson, Timothy
    Borghi, Josephine
    Sampaio, Juliana
    Gurgel Junior, Garibaldi Dantas
    Shimizu, Helena Eri
    Bezerra, Adriana Falangola Benjamin
    Silva, Keila Silene de Brito
    Barreto, Jorge Otavio Maia
    de Carvalho, Andre Luis Bonifacio
    Kovacs, Roxanne J.
    Gomes, Luciano Bezerra
    Fardousi, Nasser
    da Silva, Everton Nunes
    HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2024, 39 (06) : 593 - 602
  • [19] Analyst following and pay-performance sensitivity: evidence from China
    Yang, Bei
    Cullinan, Charles P.
    Liu, Hui
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2018, 50 (37) : 4040 - 4053
  • [20] Impact of QFII on Pay-for-performance Sensitivity in the Listed Companies
    Han Dong-ping
    Guo Cai-cai
    Lv Bi-yun
    2017 24TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2017, : 430 - 437