PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS

被引:435
|
作者
OHORI, M
WHEELER, TM
KATTAN, MW
GOTO, Y
SCARDINO, PT
机构
[1] BAYLOR COLL MED, INFORMAT TECHNOL PROGRAM, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
[2] METHODIST HOSP, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1995年 / 154卷 / 05期
关键词
PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PROGNOSIS; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66792-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical p Materials and Methods: The interval to progression (increasing prostate specific antigen level) was measured in 478 patients by status of the surgical margins. Results: At 5 years, the nonprogression rate was 64% for patients with and 83% for those without positive surgical margins. With a high grade cancer, seminal vesicle invasion or lymph node metastases, positive surgical margins had no effect on prognosis; with extracapsular extension and a Gleason score of 6 or less positive surgical margins were associated with a higher progression rate; Conclusions: Prognosis was adversely affected by positive surgical margins only in moderately differentiated cancers with extracapsular extension alone. If the cancer is otherwise confined, positive surgical margins are associated with an excellent prognosis unlikely to be improved by adjuvant therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1818 / 1824
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
    Somford, Diederik M.
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Cosyns, Jean-Pierre
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M.
    Tombal, Bertrand
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 30 (01) : 105 - 110
  • [22] Prognostic relevance of number and bilaterality of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
    Diederik M. Somford
    Inge M. van Oort
    Jean-Pierre Cosyns
    J. Alfred Witjes
    Lambertus A. L. M. Kiemeney
    Bertrand Tombal
    World Journal of Urology, 2012, 30 : 105 - 110
  • [23] Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens
    Eastham, JA
    Kattan, MW
    Riedel, E
    Begg, CB
    Wheeler, TM
    Gerigk, C
    Gonen, M
    Reuter, V
    Scardino, PT
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06): : 2292 - 2295
  • [24] Relationship of BMI to pathologic features in radical prostatectomy specimens in men with positive surgical margins
    Sotelo, T
    Ochiai, A
    Troncoso, P
    Bhadkamkar, V
    Babaian, RJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 72 - 72
  • [25] Prognostic significance of the site of the positive margin (+SM) in radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens
    Gorbonos, A
    Ohori, M
    Maru, N
    Kattan, MW
    Wheeler, TM
    Slawin, KM
    Scardino, PT
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (04): : 457 - 457
  • [26] Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens (Reprinted from The Journal of Urology, vol 174, pg 903-907, 2005)
    Swindle, Peter
    Eastham, James A.
    Ohori, Makoto
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Wheeler, Thomas
    Maru, Norio
    Slawin, Kevin
    Scardino, Peter T.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 179 (05): : S47 - S51
  • [27] Correlation of positive prostate sextant biopsy locations to sites of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens
    Borboroglu, PG
    Amling, CL
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2001, 39 (06) : 648 - 653
  • [29] Impact of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy
    Chang, Sam S.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (02) : 249 - 252
  • [30] PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF LYMPHOVASCULAR INVASION IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS
    Ng, J.
    Mahmud, A.
    Bass, B.
    Brundage, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 : S50 - S50