ANALYSIS OF CANCER RATES USING EXCESS RISK AGE-PERIOD-COHORT MODELS

被引:12
|
作者
LEE, WC [1 ]
LIN, RS [1 ]
机构
[1] NATL TAIWAN UNIV,COLL PUBL HLTH,INST EPIDEMIOL,TAIPEI 10764,TAIWAN
关键词
AGE PERIOD COHORT MODELS; ARMITAGE-DOLL MULTISTAGE CARCINOGENESIS MODELS; EXCESS RISK MODELS; LUNG CANCER; NONLINEAR OPTIMIZATION; PROSTATE CANCER;
D O I
10.1093/ije/24.4.671
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Recently the age-period-cohort (APC) model has become a popular epidemiological tool. However, it is well known that the model suffers from the identifiability problem. The simple multiplicative formulation of the model in terms of the age, period, and cohort variables without resorting to the underlying biology also casts doubt on the interpretability of the model parameters. Methods. Excess risk APC models for cancers are developed based on carcinogenesis processes in human populations. These models have the beneficial feature of biological plausibility and do not suffer from the identifiability problem. Apart from the age, period, and cohort effects, a new kind of effect, the impact effect, is also introduced into the models. A computer program has been developed to fit the models which contain non-linear as well as restricted parameters. Results Two published mortality datasets are used to demonstrate the methodology. The proposed models fit better than the conventional APC model in both examples. Conclusions. Despite all the merits of the proposed models, several statistical issues should be investigated further before accepting this methodology as a general data-analytical tool. Keywords: age-period-cohort models, Armitage-Doll multistage carcinogenesis models, excess risk models, lung cancer, non-linear optimization, prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:671 / 677
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] CONSTRAINTS IN RANDOM EFFECTS AGE-PERIOD-COHORT MODELS
    Luo, Liying
    Hodges, James S.
    SOCIOLOGICAL METHODOLOGY, VOL 50, 2020, 50 (01): : 276 - 317
  • [32] Rethinking age-period-cohort mortality trend models
    Alai, Daniel H.
    Sherris, Michael
    SCANDINAVIAN ACTUARIAL JOURNAL, 2014, 2014 (03) : 208 - 227
  • [33] Over-Dispersed Age-Period-Cohort Models
    Harnau, Jonas
    Nielsen, Bent
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 113 (524) : 1722 - 1732
  • [34] Comments on 'Age-period-cohort models for the Lexis diagram'
    Rosenbauer, Joachim
    Strassburger, Klaus
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (09) : 1557 - 1561
  • [35] Age-Period-Cohort Models in Cancer Surveillance Research: Ready for Prime Time?
    Rosenberg, Philip S.
    Anderson, William F.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2011, 20 (07) : 1263 - 1268
  • [36] The age-period-cohort analysis of suicide in Japan
    Ooe, Y
    Furukawa, T
    Ohno, Y
    Nakamura, T
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2001, 41 : 384 - 384
  • [37] A comprehensive approach to age-period-cohort analysis
    Keyes, K. M.
    Li, G.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2008, 167 (11) : S109 - S109
  • [38] Age-period-cohort models for the Lexis diagram - Reply
    Carstensen, B.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (09) : 1561 - 1564
  • [39] Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Female Breast Cancer Mortality in Korea
    Choi, Yunhee
    Kim, Yeonju
    Park, Sue K.
    Shin, Hai-Rim
    Yoo, Keun-Young
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2016, 48 (01): : 11 - 19
  • [40] Discrete-Time Survival Models with Neural Networks for Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Credit Risk
    Wang, Hao
    Bellotti, Anthony
    Qu, Rong
    Bai, Ruibin
    RISKS, 2024, 12 (02)